Do Mike Rogers and Dianne Feinstein Even Know What They Think They Know About NSA Snooping?
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
Why are they defending an agency that may even be concealing information from them?
Applying a little pressure over spying revelations?
To refuse to serve the state is the highest crime
The president and congressional leaders are proven liars
For lying to Congress about spying
Can't have oversight when overseers aren't given information
Provide generic info when asking for permission to surveil from FISA court
And yes, they've accessed content
The snoops aren't going to like this
Why is Bloomberg afraid to equip New York City police with body cameras?
Congress not provided with important information prior to Patriot Act renewal
Look elsewhere for privacy
It would be a bit of a conflict of interest
A review of the NSA's surveillance managed by the executive branch can't really be called "independent"
Heading off the surveillance state
XBox One due out in November
How the president uses language as a cover for the abuse of power.
"Who's ever heard of this information being misused by the government. In what way?"
Fears of surveillance cause change of plans
Yes, the guy caught lying to Congress about the scope of surveillance
They're all patriots
Says that sort of rhetoric drives him crazy
clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right
Transparency, eventually, finally. After being sued, of course.
Debate made too "rapid" and "passionate" because of the leaks, president claims