Who Owns Your Brain Data?
Nita A. Farahany's The Battle for Your Brain shows how neurotech can help, or hurt, human liberty.
Nita A. Farahany's The Battle for Your Brain shows how neurotech can help, or hurt, human liberty.
It’s a win for self-defense rights in ongoing campaigns to conscript businesses for political causes.
The trade association says the overbroad and vague A.B. 2273 places unconstitutional burdens on speech.
Plus: U.S. special forces seeks “next generation” deepfake tech, the economic cost of the PRO Act, and more…
Plus: More lawmakers move to decriminalize psychedelic plants, Tennessee's "adult cabaret" law, and more...
Officials shield government abuses from litigation by claiming “national security.” The Supreme Court declined to weigh in.
Brokers will have to report every trade and the trader’s personal information.
The government is refining its ability to track your movements with little discussion.
The longest-serving California senator was a hardline drug warrior, a surveillance hawk, and no friend of freedom.
Government agencies have paid to access huge amounts of Americans' data.
The age verification proposal is a disaster for both children and adults.
Virginia’s children’s privacy proposal leaves businesses wondering how they can comply.
Thousands of local, state, and federal law-enforcers have access to sensitive financial data.
Eliminating privacy in schools would be a disaster for academic freedom and social development.
Part of a law that authorizes warrantless snooping is about to expire, opening up a opportunity to better protect our privacy rights.
The court ruled that the state's six-week abortion ban violates the right to privacy.
Intelligence-gathering “fusion centers” repeatedly abuse civil liberties without making us safer.
Plus: Still no House speaker, the gender gap in college scholarships, Meta fined $414 million, and more...
Zion’s attempts to push out unwanted renters collides with Fourth Amendment protections.
The release of the former president’s tax returns sets a dangerous precedent.
A surveillance state is no less tyrannical when the snoops really believe it's for your own protection.
No judge should have to fear for their lives as they defend the rule of law. But that doesn’t mean they can infringe on other civil liberties to protect their information.
A law to protect people engaged in journalism from having to reveal sources gets blocked by Sen. Tom Cotton.
Kelly Conlon's bizarre experience gives a glimpse into a future with omnipresent facial recognition systems.
Senator Warren wants to extend the financial surveillance state cooked up by drug warriors and anti-terrorism fearmongers to cryptocurrencies.
Photos and information you store on iCloud will be safer from hackers, spies, and the government.
A precedent set in the January 6 prosecutions could be dangerous to the public.
How a Prohibition-era legal precedent allows warrantless surveillance on private property.
At a dangerous moment for the free exchange of ideas, civil libertarians can tally a win.
Congress should not forget that they can legislate in response to Supreme Court rulings.
Too many Western governments want to follow in the footsteps of authoritarians when it comes to tech privacy.
This surveillance would be unconstitutional—and there’s no reason to believe it will make anyone safer.
The Atlas of Surveillance lets us monitor the agencies that snoop on the public.
The bill would amp up surveillance while doing little to actually protect anyone.
Rethinking the constitutional defense of reproductive rights after Dobbs via the Ninth Amendment
Voters will soon cast ballots on a constitutional amendment that seeks to explicitly remove any protections for abortion in the state's constitution.
Fearmongering about mass school shootings leads to some dumb, privacy-threatening ideas.
Any new rules for the crypto market should protect entrepreneurs and investors from overzealous intervention, not subject them to it.
While the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act was hailed as a victory for digital privacy, critics warn of a litany of unintended consequences.
Judge Gary Klausner admits that the FBI probably hid their true motives in rifling through the contents of hundreds of safe deposit boxes, but says that's fine.
"[A] prisoner's right to be free from highly invasive intrusions on bodily privacy by prison employees of the opposite sex—whether on religious or privacy grounds—does not change based on a guard's transgender status."
A new ordinance passed by the city's Board of Supervisors allows police to request live access to private security cameras even for misdemeanor violations.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks