State-Run TikTok Coming Soon?
Not if Rand Paul and Ro Khanna can help it.
as courts rarely protect defendants who count on executive non-enforcement," writes Prof. Alan Rozenshtein (Minnesota).
But "[n]othing in Plaintiff's conclusory assertions suggest that Plaintiff could plead facts plausibly linking his identity with that of the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto."
The Court's approach to the choice of law question (or, federal courts doctrine for property lawyers).
The Tyler case and the choice of law questions it raises.
The popular video app restored service in the U.S. after President-elect Donald Trump promised to postpone a federal ban.
Riley's murder was an atrocity. But the law bearing her name is a grab bag of authoritarian policies that have little to do with her death.
One of many allegedly defamatory statements allegedly sent by a former summer intern at a financial company; the court holds a proposed preliminary injunction against future speech by defendant about plaintiff would be an unconstitutional prior restraint, but issues a narrower injunction.
A new lawsuit alleges that, after failing to treat a placental abruption, medical staff conspired to have Brittany Watts arrested for her miscarriage.
A judge lets Loomer's defamation claim against Maher and HBO go forward.
The Justice Department temporarily suspended the program in November because of "significant risks" of constitutional violations.
The pandemic showed the weakness of the leadership class. [UPDATE: Inadvertently posted it under my byline, but it's of course Ilya Shapiro's post, as the byline now reflects. -EV]
The Supreme Court appears poised to uphold a ban on the app, but many creators aren't so sure.
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a Texas case that could have major ramifications across the country—including, perhaps, the end of anonymity online.
The president-elect lost his Second Amendment rights thanks to a nonsensical gun ban.
How a 1949 Supreme Court dissent gave birth to a meme that subverts free speech and civil liberties.
The Department of Homeland Security is watching men who are mad they can’t get girlfriends.
Anyone discussing free speech should at least try to get this right.
featuring Prof. Saurabh Vishnubhakat (Yeshiva), Profs. Gregory Dickinson (Nebraska), Prof. Christina Mulligan (Brooklyn), Dhruva Krishna (Kirkland & Ellis), and me.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if Donald Trump is the most libertarian president ever.
The Cato Institute is urging the Supreme Court to take up the case and reaffirm that the liability shield does not apply to "obvious rights violations."
Five "traffickers" arrested for responding to an undercover cop's sex ad are challenging their convictions in the state's high court.
My "lived experience" at Georgetown gave me a unique perspective on the higher-ed crisis.
The right result, I think, but I don't think the court's reasoning is quite right.
President Daniel Ortega's crackdown on religion is part of a broader attack on civil liberties.
How a 1949 Supreme Court dissent gave birth to a meme that subverts free speech and civil liberties
Justice Neil Gorsuch criticized "the government's attempt to lodge secret evidence in this case." Still, things look grim for the app.
Despite some notable wins, the president-elect's overall track record shows he cannot count on a conservative Supreme Court to side with him.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10