FIRE Files Lawsuit Against ICE Violations of the First Amendment
ICE is a menace to freedom of speech, as well as other civil liberties.
ICE is a menace to freedom of speech, as well as other civil liberties.
A new lawsuit accuses the Trump administration of violating the First Amendment rights of its critics by issuing warning notices to them.
As to James' discrimination claim, "James, who was on disciplinary probation leading up to the suspension, admits that Columbia suspended students involved in the encampment and fails to identify another student, who was also on disciplinary probation, whom Columbia declined to discipline."
Plus: World Cup tourists embrace America, the Supreme Court expands gun rights, and Europe's resistance to air conditioning
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon argues that both laws are unconstitutional because they prohibit arms in common use for lawful purposes.
The anti-social media crusaders have popular support. That should worry online freedom advocates.
High-level state officials launched a threat investigation over a harmless postcard to Florida's chief financial officer.
Plus: The Democrats' Project 2029 would ban minors from social media, the Supreme Court protects private data in geofence warrant ruling, and more...
The court concluded that the particular broadcast in this case didn't name or otherwise sufficiently identify the plaintiff (Dr. Mahendra Amin), and thus wasn't "of and concerning" him for libel law purposes.
Don't assume this couldn't happen in America too.
"Respondent was exercising her protected First Amendment right to free speech, and in so doing, did not undermine the trust of the students and families that they serve."
I've seen some carping about the process. But getting to the right result is the ultimate goal.
"[Students] reported that the course content did not align with its description in the course catalog; that the course was poorly organized and 'essentially was a stream of consciousness conversation' about Dr. Chavis's personal issues; and that Dr. Chavis humiliated certain students because of, for example, their race and fraternity affiliation."
Two distinctly American traits that powered the Revolution: We don't like being told what to do by our supposed betters, and we really don't like being told to shut up.
A lawyer's—and former trial judge's—perspective.
Plus: failing power grids, Canadian euthanasia, AOC running for president, and more...
As America races toward its 250th birthday, Paine is the Founding Father to cast our lot with.
The exiled opposition leader is claiming the regime wants “to bury the truth when Venezuelans want to bury our dead with dignity."
A look back on a year of immigration enforcement expansion funded by the OBBBA.
The case could settle the long-simmering issue of whether the Second Amendment covers commonly owned but politically disfavored rifles.
Politicians who don’t like receiving nastygrams should quit government work.
The justice criticizes the Court’s endorsement of coercive plea bargaining and its embrace of dubious Fourth Amendment doctrines.
The Supreme Court has "no shortage of tools" to enforce the separation of powers, Justice Neil Gorsuch notes. "The only real question is whether we will use them."
Semafor reported on Project 2029’s "Kids Over Clicks" proposal, which outlines Democrats' plans to regulate social media and AI companies.
The justice argues that the "reasonable expectation of privacy" test and the third-party doctrine are indefensible in theory and unworkable in practice.
Federal law can punish true threats, and doxing intended to facilitate violence. But this woman simply named a government agent, which is not a crime.
Understanding Chatrie v. United States.
My new law review article defends long-standing principles: The privilege is not only constitutionally required, but it also helps to protect abuse victims by bringing sexual abuse to light.
The Ninth Circuit allows a religious discrimination claim against Alaska Airlines to go forward, based on its firing of Christian flight attendants who objected on a company-run intranet to the company's statement in favor of a federal ban on sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination.
A new chapter in the never-ending battle between centralized power and local control.
The American Long Rifle was accurate at long distances, unlike British smoothbores.
I took part along with Deborah La Fetra of the Pacific Legal Foundation (who helped litigate the case).
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.