When Does Speech About Crimes Become a Crime?: Podcast
A conversation with Eugene Volokh about what's legal to publish and why-plus doxxing, lock picking, source protection, and more.
A conversation with Eugene Volokh about what's legal to publish and why-plus doxxing, lock picking, source protection, and more.
A day after DOJ joined free speech lawsuit, UM agreed to change policy that said "the most important indication of bias is your own feelings."
"The United States has a significant interest in the vigilant protection of constitutional freedoms in institutions of higher learning."
It's not just email spam; GDPR has led companies to shut down access to sites and games.
From DIY guns to designer drugs, classic-car parts, and human livers, 3D printing promises a dynamic and uncontrollable world.
The N.Y. Senate just unanimously passed a bill that would do that.
So holds the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, affirming a juvenile court finding of responsibility.
Former Senate Intel Committee staffer charged with lying about relationships with reporters covering Carter Page investigation.
The mercurial justice lets everybody down, again.
The company's hands-off, user-centered approach is a model other content platforms would do well to emulate.
Each one of us has the right to access court records, so we can just sue pro se (though it helps to know the legal rules).
A tiny free speech victory.
The First Amendment constrains speech regulation by the government, not by private parties.
I coauthored an amicus brief in an important takings case, on behalf of the Cato Institute, The National Federation of Independent Business, and several other organizations.
How much do you trust judges to make such decisions without public scrutiny?
The government still snoops on its own citizens, but we're more aware of it-and we can push back.
There's a New Hampshire prosecution for criminal libel of a police chief -- and it may well be legally viable, at least if the defendant's statement is seen as a knowingly false factual claim. [UPDATE, June 8, 2018: Charges have now been dropped.]
Despite its ruling in favor of a Colorado baker, the Court remains hostile to religious exemptions from anti-discrimination laws.
The court decision was just a declaratory judgment, and thus not strictly legally binding.
An interesting opinion from three Georgia Supreme Court Justices.
"Slowly, we will continue to crush the Left's will to resist, as they will crack under pressure."
A libel lawsuit in which the alleged libel is sealed is like Hamlet without the Prince -- or maybe like Othello with Iago's slanders redacted.
Four Justices opined on this issue, with Justices Thomas and Gorsuch saying that requiring bakers to make cakes for same-sex weddings is an unconstitutional speech compulsion, and Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor saying the opposite.
This 7-2 ruling is more about Colorado's biased enforcement of discrimination law than freedom of expression.
"[A] soldier who willfully communicates information relating to the national defense 'is not entitled to invoke the First Amendment as a shield to immunize his act of thievery.'"
No, says the Iowa Supreme Court, rejecting the claim that such statements (labeled "counterculture practices" by the plaintiffs) were libelous or negligent.
His sneak attack on the reproductive rights of women.
Conservatives want to hold the left to the Roseanne standard.
The center-right Danish government, whose members defended the Mohammed cartoons, has passed more laws restricting free speech than any government since World War II, says free-speech podcaster Jacob Mchangama.
But it took a federal court order.
Our video is awesome. But nothing in the First Amendment says YouTube has to run it.
We offer how-tos, personal stories, and guides for all kinds of activities that can and do happen right at the borders of legally permissible behavior.
Build a Glock 17 using parts from the internet
A beginner's guide to protecting your messages, masking online movements, and steering clear of digital snoops
The very fact that Robinson got 13 months in jail was also initially illegal to report.
The show navigated a fascinating complicated world of ideological diversity. Its star was not so adept.
The president and his detractors both bungle scare stories in the outrage-politics contest that passes for our immigration policy debate.
Was their miscount of unlockable phones truly a mistake or part of an agenda?
Let's argue about the president's policies instead of his "grammar & style."
College limits protest, suppressing everybody's free expression.
Star Trek actor is a victim of #MeToo overreach.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10