In Purported Global First, Dutch City Bans Meat Ads
Haarlem lawmakers claim the ban will help fight climate change.
Haarlem lawmakers claim the ban will help fight climate change.
A crackdown on insults, hate speech, and misinformation punishes dissenters who express themselves in ways that offend government officials.
Of the over 84,000 public comments available on the proposed Title IX regulations, a third included references to both “sex” and “sports.”
The need for a comprehensive strategy addressing election misinformation.
The relative narrowness of the law, the court concludes, distinguishes the law from the one struck down in Packingham v. North Carolina.
Plus: Student drag shows are protected speech, a bank CEO rebuffs Rep. Rashida Tlaib, and more...
First Amendment implications for state laws targeting election speech.
Michigan is now a more dangerous place for anyone who flies with large amounts of cash.
Even though it might cause pearl-clutching, there is nothing obscene about drag shows.
Unsurprisingly, numerous Russians don't want to be forced to fight in Vladimir Putin's pointless war.
A First Amendment framework for analyzing restrictions on election-related speech.
We’re likely to be poorer, distrustful, and less free for years to come.
Democrats and Republicans both demand solutions that are inconsistent with the First Amendment.
An indictment for a crime, the court stresses, is very different from a conviction of the crime.
An overview of state efforts to combat election misinformation.
It’s a terrible ruling that misunderstands years of First Amendment precedents. And it’s increasingly likely that the Supreme Court will have to intervene.
Although the federal government has largely stayed out of regulating the content of election-related speech, the states have been surprisingly active in passing laws that prohibit false statements associated with elections.
Jimmy Wales talks about why his online encyclopedia works, how to improve social media, and why Section 230 isn't the real problem with the internet.
They mandate occupation of private property without the consent of the owner.
Anti-royalists are facing fines and jail sentences for disrupting ceremonial events
Brittany Martin, who is pregnant, was sentenced to four years in prison after telling police they'd "better be ready to die for the blue. I'm ready to die for the black."
Yes, according to a growing body of research, says criminologist Adam Lankford.
The case is now on appeal after a lower court said the ban on websites promoting prostitution didn't concern protected speech.
The problem is the Court's ultra-broad interpretation of Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce. But the justices might cut that back.
While a new report highlights Mississippi's jailing of mentally ill people, the practice is common nationwide.
The senator's avowed devotion to federalism is no match for his political ambitions.
Plus: Court-ordered "care," railroad strike averted (for now), and more...
Under the new regulations, Title IX investigators can deny students access to the evidence against them.
"On information and belief, and as discovery will likely reveal, Green has been acting as a proxy for another performer who, mistakenly believing that she and Plaintiff are stars of equal stature, has repeatedly used other social media intermediaries in a hopeless effort to advance her career at Plaintiff’s expense."
Should an appellate court provisionally seal a brief until the case is heard on the merits? Or should it try to make a redacted version promptly available?
A new Cato report sheds light on "jawboning," or attempts by state actors "to sway the decisions of private platforms and limit the publication of disfavored speech."
The Republican senator improbably claims his bill is authorized by the 14th Amendment and the Commerce Clause.
"This is inhumane," one child told state inspectors.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks