Elizabeth Warren Wants To Make It a Crime To Give Out Fake Info About Voting
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
The overturned rules banned microscopes and shovels as drug paraphernalia and prohibited pictures of cannabis or the equipment used to grow it.
Speech was more varied and vibrant than ever before—and then the backlash began.
Singapore ordered Facebook to attach a "false information" message to a news story written by a government critic.
Plus: The ACLU sues the FBI, divorce rates are at 40-year low, and more...
Attacks and threats by elected officials lead to inevitable self-censorship.
Most respondents, especially millennials, favored viewpoint-based censorship, suppression of "hurtful or offensive" speech in certain contexts, and legal penalties for wayward news organizations.
The FDA finally has agreed to allow a mild statement about the relative hazards of snus and cigarettes.
The state's hate crimes law—a "rarely enforced relic dating to 1917"—eviscerates free speech.
As always, the best answer to bad speech is more speech, not censorship.
Is there room for the entire world on this slippery slope?
A spokesman for Gov. Jared Polis objects to a news story not because it’s wrong, but because of who wrote it.
If you think a map of the moon might help an inmate escape, you might be a prison censor.
Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Twitter are in the federal government's crosshairs, but the technology necessary to undermine their dominance may already exist.
The company's Chinese ownership may have something to do with it.
Supervisor Shamann Walton thinks he can use restrictions on commercial speech to suppress political speech.
Conservatives deploy state power to go after speech they don't like.
Nobody is being "confused" by vegetarian meat substitutes.
Conservatives who argue that the video platform is constrained by the First Amendment are forsaking their constitutional principles.
Harry Potter and the Baffling Return of Religious Panic
The same First Amendment principles that apply to the president also apply to the congresswoman.
The move would violate the First Amendment.
Trying to get the government involved in what sort of videos online platforms promote or hide is going to end badly.
It would essentially be a Fairness Doctrine for the internet.
Companies should forced neither to help spread offensive speech nor to suppress it.
Plus: the trouble with "national conservatism," the decline of the mortgage interest deduction, and more...
The presidential hopeful alleges the company violated her First Amendment rights when it suspended her campaign advertising site for 6 hours.
The pundit made the claim at a Senate hearing on allegations of tech censorship against conservatives.
Trump supports a bill that would encourage censorship in the name of free speech.
The idea that the internet should enjoy minimal government oversight precisely because it was a technology that enabled open and free speech for everyone has been turned on its head.
Plus: Air-launched rockets, the GOP becomes the party of Trump, and Pelosi feuds with AOC.
New Orleans can't use zoning regulations to decide what counts as artistic expression.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R–Mo.) has proposed a dreadful bill that would give the government control of internet content. He thinks the only reason anyone could be opposed is because they've been bought off.
The state's Liquor and Cannabis Board changed its policy after Hempfest and two marijuana retailers challenged it on constitutional grounds.
Countries across the world tackle political misinformation with authoritarian censorship.
From Sohrab Ahmari to Josh Hawley, what the new right really wants is to squelch free expression.
A 6-3 ruling says that the First Amendment protects brand names that are considered “immoral” or “scandalous.”
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks