Apocalypse Tomorrow: Trump's Looming Indictment
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Plus: the terrible case for pausing A.I. innovation
Three reasons not to ban the popular social media app
Once again, politicians use popular fears to push for open-ended power.
Jonathan Haidt's integrity and transparency are admirable, but the studies he's relying on aren't strong enough to support his conclusions.
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
Today, TikTok. Tomorrow, who knows?
TikTok's CEO served as little more than a punching bag for lawmakers with a dizzying array of big tech grievances.
It would result in shortages, decreases in productivity, and higher production costs affecting millions of American workers and nearly every consumer.
Plus: Police sue Afroman for using footage from raid, California bill could ban popular junk foods, and more...
Federal, state, and local officials will always threaten to weaponize the state against private actors they don't like. The "Kia Challenge" provides the latest example.
Momfluenced bemoans unrealistic expectations set on American mothers but then establishes new ones.
While the FDA keeps experimental treatments out of reach, the spoonie world makes a diagnosis into an identity.
Turning every streaming service into TikTok is bad for the internet. It'll be disastrous for music.
Plus: The editors puzzle over Donald Trump’s latest list describing his vision for America.
A new 60-minute screen time warning on TikTok won’t stop kids from scrolling.
Bipartisan efforts to ban the app in America would be a great blow to our economy and our liberty.
Market forces have historically disrupted the tech sector and will continue to do so.
It's hard to believe its arguments will hold up in court.
Plus: Justin Amash and Jane Coaston talk about the Libertarian Party, a fatal flaw in anti-vaping studies, and more...
The lawsuit alleges that TikTok's algorithm funnels inappropriate content directly to teens. That not only defies logic, but it is also antithetical to how a social media platform keeps users.
In his dismissal order, the judge cited Section 230, the law protecting websites from liability for user-generated content.
Despite acknowledging that "the costume issue is small," the Iredell-Statesville School Board is suggesting banning animal costumes in response to online rumors.
It would be far easier to prosecute sex trafficking if voluntary sex work were legal.
For the officer's excessive force, the protester was later awarded a $175,000 settlement over the 2016 incident.
A lawsuit alleges that the social media giant "tries to conceal the dangerous and addictive nature of its product, lulling users and parents into a false sense of security."
Plus: Texas can't investigate family of transgender teen, SCOTUS considers case on doctor drug trafficking, and more...
Are TikTok security risks real or imagined? And will users be served by greater federal government intervention?
Plus: The ERA returns (again), Rep. Nancy Mace's marijuana mission, and more...
TikTok's "devious licks" trend has earned the company and its teen users plenty of scorn. But what's actually going on?
A new analysis reportedly showing a huge proportion of TikTok content is racist tells us nothing about the overall prevalence of extremist and bigoted content on the app.
TikTok may have outlasted the Trump administration, but whether it will find another enemy in Biden is unclear.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10