Rand Paul on Syria: The U.S. Was not Attacked and the President Needs Congressional Approval
Imagine what the past 15 years would have been like here and abroad if American foreign policy followed the Constitution.
Imagine what the past 15 years would have been like here and abroad if American foreign policy followed the Constitution.
Nothing says "leader of the free world" like killing bad guys.
Susan Rice, war-authorization, and confrontation with the Russkies all get a real-time workout
President Trump says attack was to protect 'vital national security interest' of U.S.
The Trump administration is slouching toward war with Syria, and Congress, as usual, is failing to assert its constitutional role.
Trump said he was "flexible" on world affairs-the public tends to be less skeptical of interventionism in the wake of chemical attacks, too.
A U.S. airstrike in Mosul could have caused the largest civilian casualties since the start of the Iraq War.
Reports show possible loosening of restrictions on strikes, more CIA participation.
Bombing campaign in Yemen intensifies as additional troops head to Syria, elsewhere.
President Trump has promised both non-interventionism and "safe zones" in Syria. He can't have both.
As worldwide refugee populations peak, the American president slashes numerical targets toward historic lows. Meanwhile, conservative apologists call his stance 'moderate.'
The dissonance between the countries the Trump EO primarily affects and countries associated with 9/11 is embedded in U.S. foreign policy.
Putin is an awful, awful ruler. But can the United States get real about his goals and and his limits?
"Safe zones" are just "no-fly zones" by another name.
Police shot and killed the gunman, who also reportedly yelled "Allahu akhbar."
Matt Welch, Katherine Mangu-Ward, and Nick Gillespie chew through the news of the day and get heartburn.
Says she acknowledges the risks but her policy preferences don't indicate she does.
The New York Times may think this will wound Johnson, but a similar moment of "unpopular" truthtelling regarding American foreign policy was the making of Ron Paul in 2007.
Asked by Chris Matthews to name a foreign leader he admires, the Libertarian blanks out.
The United States, like every other interest involved in Syria, is on every side of the war. But let's talk about horse-race politics!
Lazy metonym that provides convenient framing.
"Serious" major party candidates screw up foreign policy questions almost every election cycle.
It's important to be the right kind of war hawk.
Americans turn to social media to express regret since they're not actually going to vote for anyone who would curb U.S. intervention.
Blind spots big enough to get rebels through.
On war and peace, he's dangerously unpredictable, while she's predictably dangerous.
Here's a short tutorial on everything that's wrong with interventionists' rationale for war and more war.
Obama administration insists no "conventional ground troops and ground force operations on the ground".
The Pentagon resumed funding and training rebels this month.
Asylum-seekers performed first aid on man who recently wrote "integration is genocide."
Prince Hans-Adam II says open borders, low taxes, free trade, and small government should define "the state in the third millennium."
Trump is more skeptical of foreign intervention, but both promise to boost military spending and destroy ISIS.
Rep. Justin Amash on Capitol Hill skullduggery, surveillance surprises, and how Donald Trump "could be very dangerous as president"
Who will call her on it?
If this is disestablishmentarianism American-style, we are in bad shape.
The rational "moderate" wants to overthrow Assad, wage a "massive" war against ISIS, punch Russia in the nose, green-light pre-emptive strikes against North Korea and maybe Iran, and give government access to your cell phone...but it's all good because he expanded Medicaid and isn't Donald Trump
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks