Obamacare at the Supreme Court: Damon Root on King v. Burwell
Is the government's position "gobbledygook?"
Is the government's position "gobbledygook?"
Sharp questions for both sides. Kennedy and Roberts likely hold the deciding votes.
The High Court may be leaning toward the administration's position on the health law case.
The administration's case is little more than a request for legal permission to rewrite the law.
The Supreme Court prepares for another legal showdown over Obamacare.
Understanding the legal philosophy of the conservative Supreme Court justice.
Sen. Paul takes sides in a libertarian-conservative battle over SCOTUS and the Constitution.
He can't win this fight, but he could win primary votes.
The justices drank wine together before the speech.
Why the chief justice could reject the government's position in King v. Burwell.
The Constitution promises uncompromising protection of liberty.
Some see the Supreme Court tipping its hand by declining stays of rulings.
The implications reach far beyond just raisins.
He encourages governor to ignore a federal judge's rulings.
One week after allowing an Oklahoma inmate's execution to be carried out, SCOTUS agrees to hear appeal over the state's use of a controversial execution drug.
Right now, 39 states have legal same-sex marriage recognition, but there's a hitch.
Sonia Sotomayor stands up for the Fourth Amendment in drug-sniffing dog case.
The authoritarian element of conservative thought persists, but it may be getting weaker.
When does the use of a drug-sniffing dog transform a lawful traffic stop into an illegal seizure?
Maybe Congress can't "turn back the clock" on the EPA's lawless Clean Power Plan, but the courts may well do so.
The latest example of battlefield technology finding its way home to civilian policing
Justices take up cases from four states where same-sex marriage recognition bans have been upheld.
The libertarian-leaning Republican wants the Supreme Court to strike down offensive state and federal laws.
9-0 decision affirming criminal conviction.
Justices appear to find free speech violation.
Chefs and consumers are overjoyed. Some legal experts in the state are also satisfied.
We've reached a point where liberals argue that the court should avoid disrupting any laws that are driven by progressive notions of compassion.