Will Another Court Vote to Strike Down Obamacare?
It sure looks like it.
The commerce secretary could easily have reinstated the citizenship question if he had been less transparently dishonest.
Did Trump change his mind about the citizenship question twice, or did his underlings ignore him? Which is worse?
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit hears oral argument in Texas v. US on July 9, and SCOTUS will revisit the ACA next term.
A strange ambiguity about yesterday's decision in Rucho v. Common Cause
What one executive does, another can undo.
The conservative justice would have permitted a nakedly anti-competitive regulation.
Chief Justice Roberts' irked both Left and Right with his Census decision - encapsulating what we saw the entire SCOTUS term.
State legislatures and Congress can (and probably should) take steps to limit partisan gerrymandering. This was never an issue for the courts to settle.
The Court concludes that the commerce secretary's "contrived" explanation frustrated "meaningful judicial review."
SCOTUS says it is constitutional for police to draw blood from unconscious drunk driving suspects.
Tennessee's residency requirement for retail license applicants "blatantly favors the state's residents and has little relationship to public health and safety," Justice Alito wrote.
The Court's four liberal justicces joined the majority in all three of today's Supreme Court's decisions
Another day, another conflict between the Supreme Court’s Republican appointees in a criminal justice case.
Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling expanded when the government can keep business records secret. That's bad news for transparency
A 6-3 ruling says that the First Amendment protects brand names that are considered “immoral” or “scandalous.”
“The Court usually reads statutes with a presumption of rationality and a presumption of constitutionality.”
The Roberts Court still overturns prior precedent at a lower rate than its post-War predecessors.
“Our role is to enforce the Takings Clause as written.”
The close 5-4 ruling is an important victory for constitutional property rights.
The high court ruled that prosecutor Doug Evans violated Flowers' constitutional rights when Evans sought to keep African-Americans off of the jury.
A day of relatively small opinions from SCOTUS suggests big doctrinal developments may be on the horizon
The conservative justice comes out swinging on behalf of the non-delegation doctrine.
When "almost anyone can be arrested for something," no one is safe.
The Trump appointee is not impressed by the logic of the "dual sovereignty" doctrine: "Really?"
Constitutional law is made by a politically constructed institution
SCOTUS wants to see anti-discrimination laws applied without religious bias.
Understanding today’s Supreme Court decision in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren
These three justices all share a pragmatic streak and they stuck together in three of four decisions decided today.
Concern about Chevron Deference Would Be Better Focused on Delegation
Understanding what's at stake in the important case of Kisor v. Wilkie.
A never-ending war may mean a life sentence for being classified as an enemy combatant.
In his recent memoir, he admits he seriously misinterpreted precedent in one of his most controversial decisions, but maintains he still got the result right.
Jamelle Bouie's counterintuitive recommendation would effectively eliminate constitutional limits on elected officials, including Trump and every demagogue who follows him.
Plus: intra-conservative culture war, Tulsi Gabbard on Snowden, and more…
A truly interesting and unusual Supreme Court line-up.
Sometimes Dershowitz gives really bad advice
An awful lot, but who's counting?
If Kavanaugh is a committed originalist, you would never know it based on his complacent behavior in Timbs v. Indiana.
SCOTUS sidesteps the hard questions in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky.
And that whole Voting Rights Act justification? Kinda the opposite, actually.
Some thoughts on a new draft article by Jeff Fisher and Alli Larsen
The Trump appointee warns that "little would be left of our First Amendment liberties" if cops could punish people who irk them by finding a legal reason to bust them.
Nine years after his shooting death on the border, the family of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca may finally get a chance to hold the border agent accountable.
More often than you might think
Depends on who you ask.
A new history of how the U,.S. Supreme Court has defined and enforced the limits of congressional power
Trumps two High Court nominees are jurisprudentially independent of one another.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks