A Puzzle about Learning Resources v. Trump
Why is the decision named what it is?
It wasn't the Court's opinion that is an "embarrassment."
Justices Kagan and Sotomayor have signed on to at least one opinion that expressly relied upon the major questions doctrine.
What explains the fracture in the Supreme Court's "conservative bloc"?
The new tariff will be implemented under a 1974 law that gives the president authority to impose tariffs for up to 150 days.
The battle against the president's so-called reciprocal tariffs is won, but the war for free trade and a stable business environment continues.
There are many laws that explicitly authorize the president to impose taxes on imports, but they include limits that Trump was keen to avoid.
"There is no exception to the major questions doctrine for emergency statutes," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts.
Is the conservative Supreme Court justice planning to retire this year?
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon notes that Sen. Mark Kelly's comments about unlawful military orders were "unquestionably protected" by the First Amendment.
The EPA under the Obama and Biden administrations invoked that finding to adopt strict and costly regulations aiming to reduce emissions.
Plus: Is this the Supreme Court’s next big immigration case?
The commission has targeted the news rating company with onerous record demands and a merger condition aimed at cutting off its revenue.
Lower courts keep inventing loopholes to uphold discriminatory booze regulations.
Here's a quick reminder of what the Fourth Amendment has to say about that.
The 4th Circuit held that the doorstep of an apartment did not qualify as protected "curtilage" under the Fourth Amendment.
The prosecutor's threat renewed concerns about the Trump administration's commitment to protecting Second Amendment rights.
Plus: Why is the Supreme Court’s tariff decision taking so long?
A judicial appointment that began the Supreme Court's transformation.
Drug policy reformers and Second Amendment advocates team up in a case before the Supreme Court.
A recent Federalist Society Teleforum with Adam White and Ilan Wurman
NRA Amicus Brief Argues that Ban Fails Bruen Test
The Liberty Justice Center is urging the Supreme Court to uphold a 5th Circuit decision rejecting the claim that cannabis consumers have no Second Amendment rights.
It is nearly impossible to sue a rights-violating federal agent under current caselaw.
Another summary reversal of a Fourth Circuit AEDPA decision.
Trump’s legal arguments “would weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve,” the justice said.
The antiquated statute arguably allows the president to deploy the military in response to nearly any form of domestic disorder.
The state requires carry permit holders to obtain advance permission before bringing firearms into businesses.
DHS tells officers to use "de-escalation tactics," employ "a verbal warning" instead of force when feasible, and avoid "placing themselves in positions" that trigger the use of deadly force.
A few thoughts on the oral argument in Galette v. N.J. Transit Corp.
Plus: Still waiting on the tariffs case.
State lawmakers should be more skeptical of overly broad laws, too.
They are joining the Trump administration in urging the Supreme Court to uphold a federal law that disarms "unlawful" drug consumers.
How J.D. Vance misstated the law.
The crucial question is whether the agent reasonably believed the driver he killed posed a threat, even if she was not actually trying to run him over.
Contrary to widespread speculation, the Court's first opinion of an argued case concerned neither Trump's tariffs nor voting rights.
The Supreme Court’s January docket is packed with big cases.
Adrian Gonzales is on trial for acts of "omission" that prosecutors say amounted to 29 felony counts of child endangerment.
The chief justice hails the judiciary as “a counter-majoritarian check on the political branches.”
The NYT profiles a sloppy and highly problematic empirical study of the Supreme Court.
The ruling, which emphasizes the lack of historical support for such a law, is unlikely to survive en banc review.
The president asserted broad powers to deport people, impose tariffs, and deploy the National Guard based on his own unilateral determinations.
Puzzling over a curious omission from the conservative justice.
Despite their general ignorance of constitutional law, bears pose a much less grave threat to your civil liberties than humans do.
Presidents, legislators, and police officers were desperate to blame anyone but themselves.
Is unfettered majority rule actually a good idea for the left to embrace?
It is yet another ruling that shields the government from liability for damages caused by law enforcement.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks