SCOTUS Case Involving Cannabis Fraud Highlights the Illogic of Federal Drug Testing Mandates
A trucker lost his job because he tested positive for marijuana after consuming a supposedly THC-free CBD tincture.
A trucker lost his job because he tested positive for marijuana after consuming a supposedly THC-free CBD tincture.
Plus: A listener asks the editors if the prospect of Supreme Court nominations is reason enough to favor Trump over Harris in this year’s presidential election?
With today's cert grants, the Court now has four cases that address the issue of where suits can be filed against federal agencies and who can file them.
Another interesting aside in the Royal Canin oral argument.
An amusing and potentially revealing exchange in a recent oral argument.
Some were surprised by the Supreme Court's action, but they should not have been.
Is this latest attempt at student debt forgiveness a serious policy or a pre-election ploy?
Priscilla Villarreal's case is about whether certain reporters have more robust free speech rights than others.
Without a warrant and specific proof of incriminating evidence, police should never be allowed past your phone’s lock screen.
Mason Murphy says Officer Michael Schmitt violated his rights by punishing him for constitutionally protected speech.
Remembering the first time a partisan Senate minority blocked a judicial nomination that enjoyed majority support.
An examination of how Donald Trump's appointments to the Supreme Court have affected business interests.
At its core, the oft-denigrated decision revolved around whether the government can censor information leading up to an election.
Journalists should be interested in interrogating this contradiction, should the 2024 presidential candidate continue giving interviews.
Both presidential candidates (and their running mates) seem confused about the constraints imposed by the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court is considering whether a rule targeting "ghost guns" exceeds the agency's statutory authority.
The Supreme Court will review a 5th Circuit decision that let the officer off the hook without considering the recklessness that turned a routine traffic stop into a deadly encounter.
No one knows how many federal crimes there are, the Supreme Court justice notes in Over Ruled.
A handful of states use loopholes to get around a Supreme Court ruling that declared the practice unconstitutional.
A panel examining what is in store for October Term 2024.
The Court's decision to overturn Chevron should be seen as more of a "course correction" than a revolution. (Updated with Video.)
Judge Joseph Bianco’s decision emphasizes that constitutional rights and protections belong to individuals, not groups.
Two brothers are asking the Supreme Court to stop their town from using eminent domain to steal their land for an empty field.
A prominent appellate practitioner responds to recent attacks on the justices and the Court.
Reason talked with pro-life Americans who are uncomfortable with the post–Roe v. Wade abortion policy landscape.
Could a panel of lower court judges evaluate ethics complaints against Supreme Court justices?
State boards use outdated laws to target content creators, raising urgent questions about free speech in the digital age.
Opposing Priscilla Villarreal's petition for Supreme Court review, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton portrays basic journalism as "incitement."
The outrageous seizure at the center of Rebel Ridge resembles real-life cash grabs.
No, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's initial standing rulings were not faithful applications of Supreme Court precedent.
It is now available on SSRN. The article critiques the Supreme Court's decision in the Trump Section 3 disqualification case.
The plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States are seeking Supreme Court intervention to revive their case against the federal government.
Recent New York Times reporting about the Court's deliberations on the case modestly reinforces the view that the Court ruled that disqualification from office-holding under Section 3 requires congressional legislation.
One of the nation's finest oral advocates discusses representing the United States in the Supreme Court and other topics.
The Court this year reversed Chevron, a decades-old precedent giving bureaucrats deference over judges when the law is ambiguous.
The ruling says some restrictions on guns in "sensitive places" are constitutionally dubious but upholds several others.
The ruling concludes that the government failed to show an Illinois ban is "consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation."
Priscilla Villarreal, known as "Lagordiloca," is suing law enforcement for violating her First Amendment rights. She is appealing to the Supreme Court.
In the same week that Jack Smith refiles his Trump Indictment, Justice Jackson talks about the SCOTUS decision that made refiling necessary.
In charging the former president with illegal election interference, Special Counsel Jack Smith emphasizes the defendant's personal motivation and private means.
Kevin Fair fell behind on his property taxes in 2014. The local government eventually gave a private investor the deed to his home.
The justices are hearing future cases, but that has not sped up their work.
The Edmondson Community Organization accrued a modest property tax debt. The group paid dearly for that.
After the crackdown on anarchists died down, it became more difficult to imagine anyone could go to jail in America solely for political heresy.
Does the Second Amendment allow the government to ban guns in common use for lawful purposes?
Fewer laws and less government would be a better solution to judicial warfare.
In a new book, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch describes the "human toll" of proliferating criminal penalties.
Insofar as the justices split, it was due to long-standing disagreement over the nature of the Court's original jurisdiction.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10