Why Does SCOTUS Hear So Few Second Amendment Cases?
The right to keep and bear arms occupies a curious place in American legal history.
The right to keep and bear arms occupies a curious place in American legal history.
For the justices, the question is just how much deference the president deserves.
Steven Duarte is one of several petitioners who are asking the justices to address the constitutionality of that absurdly broad gun ban.
This result is unsurprising, and was predicted by most analysts, including myself.
Brandenburg v. Ohio established the "imminent lawless action" standard. More than 50 years later, partisans keep trying to apply it selectively.
During oral argument at the Supreme Court, Solicitor General D. John Sauer cited a letter by James Madison that completely undermines the administration’s case that its tariffs are legal.
Some observations from yesterday's argument in Learning Resources v. Trump.
Plus: Outrage at Heritage, air traffic might get throttled, and more...
The legal challengers to Trump's tariffs had a good day in court.
Justice Neil Gorsuch got Solicitor General D. John Sauer to admit one "likely" outcome, if the Supreme Court upholds Trump's tariffs.
Trade deficits are not a "national emergency," and the president's import taxes won’t reduce them.
Elsid Aliaj says the seizure violated state law and the Second Amendment.
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act doesn't grant the president the power to regulate imports with tariffs. Even if it did, these tariffs would still be unconstitutional.
Learning Resources v. Trump will test both executive power and judicial fidelity.
Plus: Virginia and New Jersey governor’s races, a court ruling extending SNAP funding during the shutdown, and Trump’s tariff fight reaches the Supreme Court
The administration's legal brief reveals a critical contradiction in Trump's trade policies.
Humboldt County, California's sketchy code enforcement scheme piles ruinous fines on innocent people and sets them up to lose.
The Supreme Court will hear a case next week challenging the legality of President Donald Trump's "emergency" tariffs.
Remembering a monstrous era of American history
His administration is urging the Supreme Court to uphold a prosecution for violating a federal law that bars illegal drug users from owning firearms.
That understanding of a familiar anti-Biden slogan hinges on the political message it communicates.
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in November on whether Trump's use of tariffs is constitutional.
My review of Amy Coney Barrett's Listening to the Law.
Long-ago debates about executive authority are not as distant as they might initially seem.
Will the Supreme Court grant Trump the overwhelming judicial deference he demands?
The law applies to millions of Americans who pose no plausible threat to public safety, including cannabis consumers in states that have legalized marijuana.
The correct answer is: Yes, even when they are also regulations. Whether the Court agrees could determine the future of presidential power.
Even with a six-justice conservative majority, the Roberts Court has not (yet) increased the rate at which it overturns precedents.
The settlement, which followed Sylvia Gonzalez's victory at the Supreme Court, also includes remedial First Amendment training for city officials.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week about the "emergency aid exception" to the Fourth Amendment.
The cases give the justices a chance to address a constitutionally dubious policy that disarms peaceful Americans.
Even well-intentioned “community caretaking” can’t justify ignoring the Fourth Amendment.
Multiple judges say SCOTUS is going out of its way to grant emergency relief to the president without even bothering to explain why.
A set of interviews with the late justice is now available
Thoughts on the New York Times' Selective Survey of District Court Judges
Limits on government power are a venerable and beneficial feature of our system.
Interesting tidbits in an interview with Adam Liptak
Weakening or removing Section 230 would not fix the problems of social media, and in fact it could make things worse.
Plus: Air traffic controllers get mysteriously sick, California gubernatorial contenders can't answer basic questions, and more...
Industry insiders dominate the boards that control who can work, using government power to shut out competitors, protect profits, and block reform.
In a new Supreme Court term packed with big cases, these disputes stand out.
A revealing interview with the Supreme Court's "Steel Magnolia."
This one addresses the issue of whether the owner of a home foreclosed for nonpayment of debt is entitled to "fair market value" compensation, or only whatever the government gets from auctioning off the property, minus the debt owed.
The law is one of several attempts to override the right to bear arms by making it impractical to exercise.
The president thinks he can transform murder into self-defense by executive fiat.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks