Pride Is a Triumph of the First Amendment
Free speech, assembly, and protest—not government action—have powered LGBTQ+ progress in America.
Free speech, assembly, and protest—not government action—have powered LGBTQ+ progress in America.
The Supreme Court's ruling striking down laws banning same-sex marriage was a great victory for liberty and equality. But it should have been based on better legal reasoning.
The significance of the Supreme Court's decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County
The liberal justice faults the majority for leaving deportees to “suffer violence in far-flung locales.”
Plus: A criminal justice case that managed to unite Alito and Gorsuch.
The appeals court concluded that the restriction impinges on the right to arms and is not consistent with the historical tradition of firearm regulation.
Strict abortion bans do not seem to be seriously stopping abortions.
On this anniversary, I have posted two new articles related to one of the Supreme Court's most controversial decisions.
Although the appeals court said the president probably complied with the law he invoked to justify his California deployment, it emphasized that such decisions are subject to judicial review.
Plus: The Supreme Court upholds a state ban on transgender care for minors.
With the culture war blazing, not even the Supreme Court could agree on the medical facts of the case.
The government's lawyer told a 9th Circuit panel the president's deployments are "unreviewable," so he need not even pretend to comply with the statute on which he is relying.
The Court's majority avoids the larger question of whether laws targeting transgender individuals should be subject to heightened scrutiny, but Justice Barrett did not.
Twenty years after Susette Kelo lost at the Supreme Court, the land where her house once stood is still an empty lot.
Cops should not be free to forgo the modicum of care required to make sure they’re in the right place.
Perceptions of Amy Coney Barrett may have changed more than her jurisprudence or voting record.
Plus: The Texas Chain Saw Massacre on wax.
On its face, the law gives the president sweeping authority to deploy the military in response to domestic disorder.
My contribution to an interdisciplinary symposium on "Donald J. Trump, the Supreme Court, and American Constitutionalism"
An interesting tidbit from today's NYT profile of Justice Amy Coney Barrett
The Court ruled unanimously in favor of a disabled teenage girl and her family, who faced a higher bar to prove that her school discriminated against her.
Agents detonated a grenade and broke into the house, guns drawn. But while the decision is good news for Curtrina Martin and Toi Cliatt, their legal battle is far from over.
Melynda Vincent is asking the justices to decide whether it's constitutional to disarm people based on nothing more than a nonviolent criminal conviction.
The Supreme Court ruled decades ago that burning the flag is protected by the First Amendment, no matter how offensive that act may be.
But now his case against the government can move forward.
Plus: The glorious return of drive-in movie season.
Professor Joel Alicea on how to understand what may be the most important jurisprudential divisions on the Supreme Court.
Michael Mendenhall wants the Supreme Court to reconsider a precedent that allows home invasions based on nothing but hearsay.
The right to a civil jury trial is far more deeply rooted in American history and tradition than is the right to own guns, which the Supreme Court was right to incorporate.
The Trump Administration returned the illegally deported migrant from imprisonment in El Salvador after repeatedly claiming they could not do so.
Vicki Baker's legal odyssey is finally coming to an end.
The court ruled on Thursday that a heterosexual woman shouldn't have to clear a higher bar than a gay colleague to sue for discrimination.
Unanimous rulings on discrimination, guns, and religion once again challenge the common media narrative that the Court is hopelessly polarized.
Without such intervention, he warns, the government "could snatch anyone off the street, turn him over to a foreign country, and then effectively foreclose any corrective course of action."
Plus: A love letter to the heavy metal band Slayer.
The MAGA loyalty that Trump demands is anathema to everything that originalism is supposed to be about.
Claims that Justice Amy Coney Barrett is at the center for the Court are not supported by the data. The truth is more complicated.
A reminder that the Executive Branch retains substantial discretionary authority over immigration policy and will prevail in court when that authority is properly exercised.
The case involved a fully permitted railroad track in Utah that has yet to break ground because of environmental lawsuits.
Some additional thoughts on today's Supreme Court decision in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition.
Environmental Impact Statements do not have to consider upstream and downstream effects.
A Massachusetts 7th grader was sent home for wearing the shirt, though the school allows students to challenge the idea it conveyed.
Two decades after Granholm v. Heald was supposed to end protectionist shipping laws, states and lower courts continue to undermine the decision.
A federal judge blocks the administration's "Student Criminal Alien Initiative," which targeted foreign students who had no criminal records.
A defense of the Supreme Court's decision to let President Trump remove members of the NLRB and MSPB.
Trump’s firing of a federal agency head may soon spell doom for a New Deal era precedent that limited presidential power.
The deadlocked court doesn't provide much clarity to sticky questions about the limits of religious freedom.
U.S. District Judge Matthew Garcia rejected the argument that the officers "recklessly created the need to apply deadly force by going to the wrong address."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10