The eminent domain reform bill is the same legislation that has passed the House three previous times since 2005. Each time, it died in the Senate without ever coming to a vote.
Award-winning movie about Susette Kelo's attempt to save house from a local government gone klepto is out on streaming and video-on-demand services.
The Goldwater Institute filed three cases in California, Seattle, and Miami Beach to defend the rights of property owners against unfair home sharing laws.
The case will decide whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment applies to the states. If so, it will also have to address how much it restricts asset forfeiture.
State and local officials are doling out $4.5 billion and 1,000 acres to lure the Taiwanese manufacturing giant.
Some pundits blamed the victim, but the attack that broke six of Paul's ribs was motivated by aesthetic rage, not some actual fault of Paul's.
I coauthored an amicus brief in an important takings case, on behalf of the Cato Institute, The National Federation of Independent Business, and several other organizations.
Developer claims politicians blocked their project to favor a crony who helps the politicians.
A bill would stop the use of private lawyers to try to force residents to pay massive fees for minor crimes.
Jeff Benedict, author of "Little Pink House," proposes that the City of New London return the land it condemned in the takings that led to the notorious Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London.
Pagedale, Missouri, will stop trying to fine you for having mismatched curtains or saggy pants.
A DC law bars property owners from redeveloping land containing a full-service gas station, or removing them to make way for other uses.
A California bill that would have greatly liberalized zoning rules failed in the state legislature. The defeat has implications for the broader struggle to expand housing and job opportunities for the poor.
An impressive new movie dramatizes the story behind the famous Supreme Court case about whether it is permissible for the government to condemn homes in order to promote private "economic development."
The story of how the government can take your home against your will.
The state court ruling also concluded the taking violates the state constitution because it is for a forbidden "private use," rather than a public one.
Now they're being sued for it.
This could result in a ruling overturning a terrible 1985 decision that makes it very difficult to bring takings cases in federal court.
Ricardo Palacios is fighting for his right to be left alone.
A municipal scheme with a private prosecution firm leads to outrageous fines in the California desert.
A federal court correctly rejects a dubious takings claim by Philadelphia cab companies.
Gorsuch advances another property rights theory of the Fourth Amendment that Alito rejects.
An already awful practice of trying to use code violations as a revenue stream gets truly grotesque.
Cited for building the treehouse without a proper permit, the family must now file for permits to tear it down.
By greatly reducing zoning restrictions on housing construction, Bill 827 could massively expand opportunity for large numbers of people.
The city's goal is to curb "unconscious bias." But the policy is based on dangerous premises, and is likely to harm tenants more than it benefits them.
A new study of border takings under the 2006 Secure Fence Act finds that many owners get inadequate compensation, and that the condemnation process is flawed in other ways.
The North American Butterfly Association says Border Patrol agents have harassed employees and damaged property at the National Butterfly Center.
Property owners were ordered to pay thousands for violations unless they agreed to sell to a redeveloper.
The quick resolution of Phil Parhamovich's case shows once again that standing up to money-grabbing bullies can pay off.
Private property became the foundation for building the most prosperous nation in the history of the world.
A big defeat for anti-pipeline activists.
A couple of busted windows can result in a bill for thousands-even tens of thousands-of dollars.
A court says a city can squash your property rights because it thinks vegetables are ugly.
Twisted incentives? What are those? Rod Rosenstein doesn't seem to have heard of them.
The U.S. Supreme Court said local regulators could treat two lots owned by the same family as if they were a single parcel. A new law aims to stop that.
Gerardo Serrano still has not been compensated for the expenses imposed by the seizure.
Brian Strauss sues to protect his property rights.
Incentives for neighbors to turn on each other. Incentives for police to find reasons to seize people's stuff and keep it.
The river doesn't need rights if people have strong property rights to its water.
A new lawsuit argues that owners of vehicles seized at the border have a constitutional right to prompt hearings.
De Blasio literally wants to tell people what to do with their land.
When law enforcement agencies make money by seizing property, due process vanishes.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
