Why Did Cops Point a Gun at a Burning Gaza Protester?
The Secret Service’s strange reaction to the U.S. airman who lit himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy.
The Secret Service’s strange reaction to the U.S. airman who lit himself on fire outside the Israeli embassy.
His lawyers assert presidential immunity and discretion, criticize an "unconstitutionally vague" statute, and question the special counsel's legal status.
The WikiLeaks founder already has spent as much time in a London prison as DOJ lawyers say he is likely to serve if convicted in the U.S.
Unlike Biden's conduct, Special Counsel Robert Hur notes, the document-related charges against Trump feature "serious aggravating facts."
Congress gave FISA’s Section 702 a brief lease on life, but civil liberties concerns haven’t gone away.
His speech in Davos challenged the growing worldwide trend of increased government involvement in economic affairs.
That's bad news for Americans.
Police have set bounties on 13 activists, some living in the U.S.
The year's highlights in blame shifting.
I expect that the situation in this case was quite similar to that faced by many Americans who are also citizens of allied foreign nations.
Security clearances can be denied based on constitutionally protected speech; but there's an adjudicative process aimed at reviewing whether such denials make sense in light of the facts of each case.
The justices agreed to consider whether the Biden administration's efforts to suppress online "misinformation" were unconstitutional.
The late California senator always seemed to err on the side of more government power and less individual freedom.
The former president suggests he was not obliged to obey a subpoena seeking classified records.
Rather than posing a national security threat, the growth of China's E.V. industry is an opportunity for global innovation.
The next presidential election may be between the two men. Can't we do better?
A new national emergency declaration will allow for the creation of an outbound investment screening system targeting Americans' investments in China.
Plus: A listener question concerning drug decriminalization and social well-being
While it remains unclear how sensitive the documents he retained were, his attempts to conceal them are easier to prove.
It's a short-sighted approach that distracts us from the more important question.
Prominent reporters and powerful officials know each other, share attitudes, and trust each other.
As Washington Post columnist Catherine Rampell explains, doing so will simultaneously strengthen the US and weaken a major geopolitical rival. It can also rescue many Chinese from terrible oppression.
Lai's media company covered the Communist government's abuses when other Hong Kong media wouldn't.
By taking records that did not belong to him and refusing to return them, William Barr says, Trump "provoked this whole problem himself."
There's no deep mystery behind why Trump kept boxes of classified documents. He wanted them.
The former president's retention of classified documents looks willful and arguably endangered national security.
Plus: A rundown of recent nonsensical proposals for constitutional amendments
Plus: Mark Zuckerberg reacts to the Twitter Files, CNN's lockdown hypocrisy, and more...
The feds allege the former president was keeping classified documents on America's nuclear program and defense capabilities in his Mar-a-Lago resort.
The recorded comments could be relevant to a charge that the former president willfully mishandled national defense information.
In a federal lawsuit on behalf of legal U.S. residents from China, the ACLU argues that "Florida's New Alien Land Law" is unconstitutional.
That doesn't mean Russia is right. It means we're being honest about how much the U.S. is involved.
Never underestimate officials’ ability to turn embarrassing moments into awful opportunities.
Plus: New developments in the Texas abortion drug ruling, fallout from the Riley Gaines event at SFSU, and more...
While escalation is not inevitable, it’s still a risk having any U.S. boots on the ground.
Plus: States consider mandatory anti-porn filters, tariffs create baby formula shortages (again), and more...
Four years after IS was officially defeated, the U.S. continues to keep hundreds of troops in Syria to fight the vanquished terrorist group.
It would result in shortages, decreases in productivity, and higher production costs affecting millions of American workers and nearly every consumer.
Plus: Police sue Afroman for using footage from raid, California bill could ban popular junk foods, and more...
There’s no vital U.S. interest served by this indefinite advise-and-assist mission in the region.
People panicked in the 1980s that Japan's economic largesse posed a grave threat to American interests. Then the market reined it in.
Plus: The editors puzzle over Donald Trump’s latest list describing his vision for America.
Politicians say they want to subsidize various industries, but they sabotage themselves by weighing the policies down with rules that have nothing to do with the plans.
The legislation, which forbids shipping anything between American ports in ships that are not U.S. built and crewed, is just another a special deal that one industry has scammed out of Congress.
Plus: States move to curtail internet anonymity, Amsterdam cracks down on cannabis, sex, and booze, and more...
After $67 billion and more than 20 years, the F-22 finally won a dogfight against an unarmed, nearly immobile opponent.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks