Mandatory Employee COVID Tests Don't Violate Religious Freedom Rights or Fourth Amendment
The employee argued that "her faith in God 'will protect her from COVID-19 so there is no reason to take a test.'"
The employee argued that "her faith in God 'will protect her from COVID-19 so there is no reason to take a test.'"
The settlement came after the Justice Department agreed to return more than $1 million in proceeds from state-licensed marijuana businesses in California.
After the tragic shooting of Amir Locke, Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has made changes to the controversial practice. But are they enough?
That perplexing situation underlines the hazards of police tactics that aim to prevent violence but often have the opposite effect.
The previous standard barring such lawsuits made “little sense," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh for the majority.
Plus: New rules on sex discrimination in education, economists warn of housing market exuberance, and more...
An Arkansas police officer used trumped-up charges to punish a man who criticized him for violating the Constitution.
The officer used a "pain compliance maneuver" to force information from the boy's sister, who was recording the encounter.
So holds a Tennessee court.
Bradley Brock says his dog Moose was walking toward a police officer wagging its tail when the officer gunned his pet down.
When you plug your phone into your car to listen to your favorite band or podcast, you give police a way to rummage around in your personal data without a warrant.
From Prof. Jane Bambauer (Arizona).
Cops in Caddo Parish, Louisiana, were searching for a theft suspect on the property who was not there when they arrested William Walls and caused his death.
Brett Hankison's acquittal shows how difficult it is to hold cops accountable for abusing their power.
The justices heard oral arguments this week in Egbert v. Boule.
"You can't treat everyone like a criminal to find the criminals," an outraged driver says. In Jackson, apparently you can.
The defendants unsuccessfully argued that their training was inadequate and that they understandably deferred to a senior officer.
The former detective's trial should not obscure the responsibility of the drug warriors who authorized, planned, and executed the deadly raid.
To "get wanted individuals off the streets," police are stopping drivers without any evidence that they have broken the law.
It probably won't save any children, but it might mean the end of encrypted messaging.
Banning "no-knock" search warrants is not enough to prevent lethal confrontations between cops and people exercising the right to armed self-defense.
“After accepting a ‘friend’ request from the officer, the defendant published a video recording to his social media account that featured an individual seen from the chest down holding what appeared to be a firearm. The undercover officer made his own recording of the posting, which later was used in criminal proceedings against the defendant.” No Fourth Amendment violation, says Massachusetts high court.
A federal judge declined to issue a temporary restraining order, saying the evidence of legal violations is insufficient at this point.
"Active bystandership" training encourages officers to stop their colleagues from violating people's rights.
The city was not "required to permit the 'organized lawlessness' conducted by the protestors."
Breyer’s deference to law enforcement often led him to sell the Fourth Amendment short.
Thomas Lane, J. Alexander Kueng, and Tou Thao are charged with federal crimes for failing to stop Derek Chavin from killing Floyd.
The Institute for Justice argues that the seizures violated state law, federal law, and the U.S. Constitution.
"[T]he Fourth Amendment applies equally whether the government official is a police officer conducting a criminal investigation or a caseworker conducting a civil child welfare investigation."
Politicians and cops found creative ways to dodge responsibility in 2021.
The Institute for Justice wants the Supreme Court to review the case—and to clarify the proper scope of "investigatory stops."
The victim denied police permission to search his home. Cop shouted, "I don't need your permission!"
There are better ways to build trust in the community than by violating the Fourth Amendment.
This stop was a Fourth Amendment violation, holds a federal court.
A new case asks whether a Border Patrol agent may be sued for alleged First and Fourth Amendment violations.
Keddins Etienne's experience shows that bullies who seize innocent people's property tend to back down when their victims put up a fight.
Privacy advocates applaud the move.
The Supreme Court's notion of "fair notice," which it says requires blocking many civil rights lawsuits, is based on a demonstrably false assumption.
Cops thought Hoang Vinh Pham, who received a 15-year prison sentence, was suspicious because he stared at a police van full of marijuana.
In two opinions issued Monday, the Court gave qualified immunity to several police officers accused of violating the Constitution.
"We are not eager—more the reverse—to print a new permission slip for entering the home without a warrant," declared Justice Kagan in Lange v. California.
Residents say their cars were improperly ticketed, then impounded and scrapped after they couldn't pay off their debts soon enough.
Protecting citizens from intrusive government surveillance is a virtue well worth signaling.
The report from the attorney general's office also found that Aurora paramedics used ketamine illegally to treat "excited delirium."
An encryption back door will lead to abusive authoritarian surveillance—even if you present it as a way to stop child porn.
The 32 charges include manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, and second-degree assault.
A little-known agreement allows police officers to seize packages at FedEx sorting centers.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks