Maryland Court to Baltimore Police: Want to Track Phones? Get a Warrant.
Ruling establishes that people have expectation of physical location privacy.
Ruling establishes that people have expectation of physical location privacy.
The Supreme Court nominee's deference to government should disturb progressives as well as conservatives.
The Court's decision leaves motorists vulnerable to the whims of armed government agents who can stop them at will.
What do we know about possible SCOTUS nominee Paul Watford?
In 284 cases over two years, officers used "training and experience" as justification for obtaining search warrants.
Secure communications for me, but not for thee.
The new surveillance rules have nothing to do with stopping terrorism.
Libertarian Republican from Michigan suggests Donald Trump might be "a bigger threat" to freedom than Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders.
The 6-to-1 ruling says it's unconstitutional to punish people for withdrawing "implied consent."
The national security whistleblower talks to the Free State Project from an undisclosed location in Russia.
SCOTUS seems evenly divided on a drug search arising from an illegal stop.
Cases involving drug prohibition reveal the late justice's fickle fidelity to the Fourth Amendment and federalism.
Also calls himself a constitutionalist.
Which side are you on? Government spies or corporate guardians?
Drug cases show the late justice's fickle fidelity to the Fourth Amendment and federalism.
The late Supreme Court justice was inaccurately described as "authoritarian."
The late Supreme Court justice's mixed legacy on liberty and the Constitution
The liberal justice speaks out for the Fourth Amendment, but often fails to respect the Fifth.
The Kentucky senator encouraged his fellow Republicans to be more consistently skeptical of big government.
Legislation would require warrants for old communications.
Can city officials demand entrance to a home with no evidence of violations?
The 4th Circuit rules that police should tase people only when they pose "an immediate safety risk."
What fresh hell awaits you at airport security checkpoints in 2016?
Robert and Adlynn Harte argued that cops should have known field tests are unreliable.
Drivers should not be punished for balking at warrantless alcohol testing.
Three DUI cases give SCOTUS a chance to clarify the constitutional requirements for drug and alcohol testing.
The Supreme Court agrees to hear three new cases dealing with drunk driving suspects and the Fourth Amendment.
The common practice of pretextual stops aimed at finding seizable money takes a hit.
Nikki Autry claimed she lied on a search warrant affidavit by mistake.
Though Section 215 of the Patriot Act has expired, the NSA's other authorities to spy have not.
The Kentucky senator says his GOP rival fails to understand, "You can use the Fourth Amendment and still get terrorists."
The liberal justice files a lone dissent in Mullenix v. Luna.
Complaints detail the Border Patrol's routine constitutional abuses.
To stop you, agents need no special reason; to search your car, all they need is a dog.
This, from Ken White, a former prosectuor who has seen it all.
After marijuana decriminalization, more is required to pull someone over.
A Macomb County program aimed at "rewarding" good drivers casually violates their constitutional rights.
Jim Ardis was determined to shut down a Twitter parody and punish the man behind it.
Doesn't rule on constitutionality of Patriot Act surveillance
There are still some limits on cops' license to steal, provided courts are willing to enforce them.
Privacy advocates gain key victories in high-profile battle
A Texas cop was sure those hippies were growing pot on their farm.
Among the current presidential candidates, only Paul has advocated for fidelity to the Constitution.
The warrantless roadside cavity probe happened two days after the governor signed a bill banning such searches.
Bland's mother says "she never should have been inside of a jail."
Trooper Brian Encinia's actions may have been legal, but that does not make them right.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks