Even on Pause, Trump's Trade War Runs Up a Big Price Tag
Predictions vary as to the ultimate cost, but there’s no doubt that tariffs create economic pain.
Predictions vary as to the ultimate cost, but there’s no doubt that tariffs create economic pain.
It's a good step. But the schools should also file their own lawsuit challenging this awful policy.
They argue the tariffs violate the constitutional separation of powers and their tribal treaty rights.
The Associated Press’s legal victory highlights the limited power presidents and the press have over the creative destruction and spontaneous order of our language.
An immigration judge's decision reinforces the constitutional argument against the law that the secretary of state is invoking.
Trump lost on his most aggressive claims of executive power for the second time in a week.
Daniel Hannan argues that protectionism never works, but that's a lesson that politicians and voters seemingly have to relearn repeatedly.
Unanimous ruling is a big win for immigrant rights. But it does have unfortunate ambiguities.
Even after Trump paused some of his new tariffs for 90 days, we still have the highest average tariffs in over a century and the biggest trade war since the Great Depression. Real relief will only come if Congress or the courts deny Trump the power to do this.
Protectionism in Egypt and Iraq fueled corruption, stagnation, and smuggling—not prosperity.
There were no deals. There were no wins. There was no plan.
The government currently collects revenue in an arbitrary and distortionary manner, with loopholes that benefit special groups.
But 10% tariffs are still being imposed on nearly all countries, without any letup. And we are still moving ahead with our lawsuit challenging them.
In the span of a week, Trump cratered the stock market and brought it much of the way back, with little more than public statements.
This case has crucial implications for the ability of migrants to effectively challenge illegal AEA deportations.
The Supreme Court did not answer two of the biggest legal questions raised by Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act.
The president is politically targeting those he says politically targeted him.
The movie star’s special treatment highlights the injustice of an illogical federal law.
Although the Court lifted an order that temporarily blocked removal of suspected gang members, it unambiguously affirmed their right to judicial review.
Musk is right. Navarro is a socialist with foolish economic views who should never have been put in charge of anything.
Plus: Formula 1, Backyard Baseball, and The Great 8 vs. The Great One.
The Supreme Court oveturns lower court decisions temporarily barring AEA deportations, but also emphasizes that detainees are entitled to due process, and that AEA deportations are subject to judicial review.
Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia was illegally deported and incarcerated in a Salvadoran prison. The Trump administration admits the deportation was illegal, but claims they can't be required to return him.
The Supreme Court has ample precedent to rule against Trump’s trade war.
Plus: A listener asks if it's time for journalists to stop steel-manning Trump's policies.
Members of the administration spent the weekend presenting contradictory defenses of Trump's economic policies.
The president is raising taxes, hiking prices, and creating supply chain chaos. Congress should act quickly to stop this.
Plus: A deportation fight, pussy hats in Maine, antagonizing Brown University, and more...
"Universities were bending over for federal funds long before Trump," writes Laura Kipnis.
Did the 25th president really make America "very rich through tariffs"? William McKinley might have told you otherwise.
Links to all of his posts compiled.
Donald Trump isn't the first president to send detained migrants to the U.S. detention center in Cuba.
Although the president's pride in his negotiation skills could save us, it is hard to see what sort of deal would address his grievance about the consequences of economic freedom.
The lawsuit raises nondelegation and major questions doctrine arguments.
The article covers state sanctuary policies, their constitutional basis, how they can constrain Trump's mass deportation efforts, and how Trump can try to get around them.
With him in charge, it never stood a chance.
The company previously dropped out of the Brazilian market for five years until the country relaxed its tariffs on video games.
Dynamists, protectionists, hawks, and doves are seeing their policy goals realized in the most bungling and incompetent fashion imaginable.
The Supreme Court seems likely to agree that a member of the National Labor Relations Board may be fired by the president at will.
Attempting to defend Trump's tariffs, the White House points to studies that show they raise prices, cut manufacturing output, and lead to costly retaliation.
Evan Bernick's fourth in a series of guest-blogging posts on birthright citizenship.
Decades of efficiency mandates have made dishwashers weaker, A.C. units feebler, and appliances more expensive. A new rollback offers a rare win for function over dogma.
Governments should just get out of the way of free trade among consumers and businesses.
Brave New World was shot long before the new Trump term, but the parallels are hard to overlook.
They weren't authorized by Congress and go against the major questions and nondelegation doctrines.
And he did it after Israel dropped all its tariffs on American goods.
A small but growing bipartisan movement in the Senate is pushing back against the president's imposition of tariffs, but there's plenty of room to go further.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks