Chris Stewart Wants February To Be 'Uncomfortable History Month'
Nearly 90 gag-order bills would ban schools from teaching the grisly particulars of American history. This activist is fighting against the censorship and for school choice.
Nearly 90 gag-order bills would ban schools from teaching the grisly particulars of American history. This activist is fighting against the censorship and for school choice.
H.B. 2802 would expand discrimination protections but would carve out religious institutions.
Should Whole Foods be allowed to stop staff from wearing Black Lives Matter masks on the job?
The Inconvenient Minority author and head of Color Us United says it's time for the country to become truly colorblind.
Forget Robin DiAngelo, Ibram X. Kendi, and The 1619 Project. Start with ending the drug war, says the Columbia University linguist.
The New York Times columnist and Columbia University linguist on the "new religion" he says has "betrayed Black America."
The government argues that the company is violating the ADA by charging wait fees to disabled customers who take longer to board vehicles.
A federal judge concluded that the Texas governor's ban on mask mandates illegally discriminated against students with disabilities.
Justices have mostly demurred on the question of whether anti-discrimination laws trump religious freedom.
Plus: Biden's Afghanistan speech, Texas abortion ban takes effect, Instagram's creepy new plan, and more...
The secretary of education argues that federal law makes the CDC's COVID-19 guidelines for schools mandatory.
Plus: The critical race theory debate, delta variant surges and vaccination rates, school mask mandates, and more...
Chloe Valdary's Theory of Enchantment program uses Kendrick Lamar, Cheryl Strayed, and The Lion King to ease workplace racial tensions.
Culture war bills signed into law in Arkansas, West Virginia, and Tennessee run afoul of Constitution, federal law.
Plus: Georgia's voting roll purge draws media hype, Florida's drug law hypocrisy, and more...
No justices disagreed, but Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas object that the majority is sidestepping a debate over when laws can overrule religious beliefs.
The university abruptly shut down dozens of classes over an unfounded claim that a white student was taunted.
The article shows how the left and right-wing versions of hostility to Asians have much in common.
The case could set an important precedent because it addresses facially neutral attempts at racial balancing, and because the school in question is currently over 70% Asian-American, and new policy seeks to reduce that percentage.
Plus: House votes on $2,000 stimulus checks, another win for Brooklyn churches challenging lockdown orders, and more...
Among other parallels, both restrict liberty and opportunity based on arbitrary circumstances of birth.
New Justice Amy Coney Barrett expresses concerns about wider implications of antidiscrimination policies.
"The Court cannot punish or hold Defendants liable merely for publishing a summary of Plaintiff's disciplinary action and their commentary about that decision."
The settlement is subject to federal court approval.
Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito worry about the future of religious freedom. That’s not the same as a call to overturn the decision.
Plus: California Judicial Council sets expiration date for eviction moratorium, the U.S Justice Department accuses Yale of discriminating against whites and Asians, relations thaw between Israel and the UAE, and more...
The president's criticism of the 2015 AFFH rule is an implicit attack on his own housing reforms.
The decision is an important victory against government discrimination on the basis of religion.
British universities thought they'd found the formula that would roll back discrimination. Instead, the pay gap widened.
The Equality Act would significantly expand government power and it also threatens religious freedom.
The decision in Bostock v. Clayton County is well-justified from the standpoint of textualism (a theory associated with conservatives), but less clearly so from the standpoint of purposivism (often associated with liberals).
Justice Neil Gorsuch's majority decision offers a textualist argument for the ruling.
The agency should relax the yearlong deferral period.
The Supreme Court is about to tackle the issue.
The city's overzealous commission has ordered the company to stop selling dolls some said were racial caricatures.
The courts may not strike it down. But it remains both illegal and deeply unjust.
The Trump administration's proposed rewrite of fair housing regulations would ditch lengthy Obama-era reporting requirements in favor of a laserlike focus on housing affordability.
Erroneous reporting set off a bizarre backlash that obscured the real problem.
The “Fairness for All Act” would add federal protections against discrimination for gay and trans people. But its exemptions go too far or not far enough, depending on who you ask.
Plus: the foundations bankrolling bad tech policy, they is the word of the year, and more...
A Department of Justice lawsuit argues Hesperia’s rental ordinance amounts to illegal racial discrimination.