Supreme Court Unanimously Orders Trump To 'Facilitate' the Return of Wrongly Deported Man
Trump lost on his most aggressive claims of executive power for the second time in a week.
Trump lost on his most aggressive claims of executive power for the second time in a week.
The Supreme Court did not answer two of the biggest legal questions raised by Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act.
The Supreme Court seems likely to agree that a member of the National Labor Relations Board may be fired by the president at will.
"It appears that access to this court was improperly denied," an attorney for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press says.
Alleged criminal aliens may face legal punishment. But only after receiving due process of law.
Trump wants to purge the federal bench of judges who disagree with him. Thomas Jefferson did too, and it didn't work out.
An unconstitutional act is still unconstitutional even if lots of people support it.
The move is an escalation of the White House's attempt to claim an unchallengeable and unreviewable amount of power.
The judge ruled that Donald Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive orders targeting "gender ideology" can't change the fact that drag performance is expressive conduct under the First Amendment.
Afghan legal professionals face deadly threats, but a federal injunction and a last-minute boarding letter helped one family escape. Thousands more remain in limbo.
We can't be sure, and that's why due process matters.
"The unique nature of each human embryo means that an equal division cannot conveniently be made," writes a Virginia judge.
The judge found that the agency's "unusual secrecy" and "substantial authority" make it subject to public record laws.
If enacted, the order would weaken digital security for Apple users throughout the U.K.
The authors of a picture book about two male penguins raising a chick together argue excluding their book from school libraries violates their free speech rights.
“I cannot ignore Congress’ detailed framework for refugee admissions and the limits it placed on the president’s ability to suspend the same,” said Judge Jamal Whitehead.
Whether or not a reasonable police officer violates clearly established law when he declines to check the features and address of his target house before raiding it is thus still up for debate.
Despite severe risks and without a crime committed, a Minnesota judge authorized doctors to forcibly administer electroconvulsive therapy—while barring key witnesses from the hearing.
Vice President J.D. Vance believes presidents can ignore the courts in some situations. Are we heading for a constitutional crisis?
Local news reports detail how Polk County, Minnesota, charges drivers and petty offenders with drug-free zone violations like no other county in the state.
“I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,” said Judge John C. Coughenour.
Robert Roberson was sentenced to death based on outdated and largely discredited scientific evidence.
A unanimous Supreme Court decision established as much in 1965.
His last-minute acts of clemency invite Trump and future presidents to shield their underlings from the consequences of committing crimes in office.
In a federal lawsuit, artists say their nonfungible tokens should be treated like physical art.
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a Texas case that could have major ramifications across the country—including, perhaps, the end of anonymity online.
The Nevada Highway Patrol exceeded its legal authority when it seized nearly $90,000 in cash from Stephen Lara in 2023 and then handed the case to the DEA.
Five "traffickers" arrested for responding to an undercover cop's sex ad are challenging their convictions in the state's high court.
Courts block laws regulating algorithms and online porn.
A local government gave ownership of Kevin Fair's Nebraska house—and all of its value—to a private investor, in a practice known as home equity theft.
Media investigations found over 3 million active license suspensions in the state.
The wrongful death lawsuit says Randall Adjessom came out of his bedroom with a gun when Mobile police broke down his family's door in a predawn raid, but when he realized they were cops, he put his hands in the air.
The recent ruling means that on the stand those women may be subject to speech policing from their alleged rapist—who has opted for self-representation.
Cities and states are passing lots of productive reforms, local courts are increasingly striking them down, and local governments continue their harassment of homeless shelters.
Whether or not the government is required under the 5th Amendment to pay such victims will remain an open question.
"Our criminal justice system relies upon our own ignorance and the fact that we don't know what our rights are."
But that shouldn't detract from the many worthy people who received commutations after spending years on home confinement.
The popular but beleaguered social media app will have until January 19 to find an American buyer or be banned.
Officer Joseph Gibson now faces felony assault charges.
A class action lawsuit claims Indianapolis law enforcement is using civil asset forfeiture to seize millions in cash from packages routed through a major FedEx hub, without notifying the owners of what crime they're suspected of committing.
Amanda Knox falsely confessed to murder after law enforcement subjected her to "psychological torture." Now she wants to stop it from happening to others.
Ksenia Karelina was prosecuted as part of a larger “treason” crackdown that is unprecedented even by Russia’s illiberal standards.
U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn says the law bans firearms covered by the Second Amendment and is not supported by historical precedent.
Copying information is not the same as copying content.
A federal court recently said the Internet Archive is not protected by fair use doctrine.
He’ll be around to protect our freedom for a few more years.
The vice presidential hopeful displayed his dishonesty on Joe Rogan's podcast last week.
The famed filmmaker's likely final film is an exploration of the jury system and its flaws.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10