From Bork to Willett: Is the Conservative Legal Movement Going Libertarian?
Libertarian legal ideas are gaining ground.
Libertarian legal ideas are gaining ground.
A federal judge says personal pages used for public purposes implicate the First Amendment.
Is gun control a political thicket that unelected judges should not enter?
The court says retroactive application of the requirements violates the constitutional ban on ex post facto laws.
This confiscation, even beyond Second Amendment concerns, amounts to an unconstitutional taking of personal property.
Irrational, half-baked anti-terrorist policies are not necessarily unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court to decide if gerrymandering is unconstitutional
Neomi Rao wants to keep an eye on the regulators.
Blocked Trump critics argue that his personal account is a "designated public forum" from which they cannot legally be excluded because of their views.
Which is more important to the president: hurting Muslims or looking tough on terrorism?
The checks and challenges invited by the president's "serial recklessness" should be welcomed.
It's more complicated than you think and one method involves a constitutional amendment invoked when presidents get colonscopies.
Should we interpret the Constitution as a living document?
Since possessing a firearm in public may be perfectly legal, more is required for a police stop.
Once the trust in checks and balances is eroded, it's difficult to regain.
It's time to bring back meaningful Congressional oversight of the executive branch.
A signing statement suggests the president may ignore a congressional rider protecting patients' access to cannabis.
Government censorship always wears the mask of 'public interest,' and this will be no different.
A First Amendment lawsuit explains why Dean is wrong to think Berkeley's cancellation of Coulter's speech was constitutionally unproblematic.
The former DNC chairman's First Amendment analysis is spectacularly wrong.
For civil libertarians, the newest Supreme Court justice is better than the nominee who never got a hearing.
The justices could choose to look the other way because of the plenary power doctrine.
Arizona is the only state that does not require proof of sexual intent to convict someone of molesting children.
The SCOTUS nominee called Brown v. Board of Education "one of the shining moments in constitutional history."
New York merchants are challenging a state law that dictates the way they describe prices.
The Senate minority leader can reject a Supreme Court nominee for any reason he wants, or even none at all.
Trump's main goal is looking tough, not discomfiting Muslims.
Minnesota becomes the 39th state to allow Sunday liquor sales.
Courts assume a "frightening and high risk of recidivism," based on an unsupported claim in Psychology Today.
Can U.S. courts compel non-citizens to pay restitution to other non-citizens for crimes that took place abroad? Apparently so.
The order reportedly exempts visa holders and Iraqis as well as legal permanent residents.
Circuit court judge rules St. Louis County ordinance to be "not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad."
The court says the law "bears no reasonable relationship to protecting the public."
The appeals court says the prohibited guns and magazines are outside the scope of the Second Amendment.
The right to armed self-defense is not a license to muzzle nosy doctors.
What will the president do to address the 9th Circuit's due process concerns?
Stephen Miller falsely claims "legal permanent residents were not subject to the travel restrictions."
The government's failure to cite relevant examples helped ensure its defeat.
The appeals court thinks many people affected by the executive order have plausible due process claims.
A vigorous advocate of presidential prerogatives says Trump's promises regarding NAFTA, tariffs, and a border wall exceed his authority.
The federal judge who halted President Trump's travel ban overreached.
In an appeals court hearing, the government struggles to provide evidence that the executive order addresses "a real risk."
Unlike the president, Neil Gorsuch understands the role of an independent judiciary.
The travel ban is unfair and illogical, but that does not make it illegal.
The SCOTUS nominee plumbs the peculiarities of prohibition in cases involving imitation pot and medical marijuana.
Terrorism is only a real threat if it frightens us into destroying our liberties.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10