First Pig Kidney Transplant Patient Goes Home
Potentially good news for the nearly 100,000 Americans on the transplant waiting list.
Potentially good news for the nearly 100,000 Americans on the transplant waiting list.
Two-thirds of Americans oppose the Alabama ruling that claims frozen embryos are equivalent to children.
No, it's not ethical to keep them from potentially lifesaving information about their babies—and themselves.
All of these advances are in mice for now, but maybe these breakthroughs can one day be adapted as human therapies.
"Synthetic wombs make having kids much faster, easier, cheaper, and more accessible."
The New York Times and The Washington Post shamed the recipient of a pig heart transplant for committing a crime 35 years ago.
The eventual goal is human organ transplantation.
The initiative could pave the way for other uses of challenge trials in the UK and beyond. It might even stimulate reconsideration of other policies banning payment for voluntary risk-taking that could save many lives.
Volunteers would earn cash for the risks they take on our behalf.
A New York Times Magazine forum highlights the moral implications of suppressing economic activity.
Gene drives could spread this beneficial trait through wild mosquito populations.
He Jiankui's moral failings should not be used as an excuse to delay a technology that could prevent inheritable diseases.
A U.K. bioethicist makes the case for deploying CRISPR gene-editing to modify human embryos in the next two years.
A fierce, but friendly, antagonist in various bioethical controversies
Is that kind of gene-editing unethical?
Plus: Oakland decriminalizes mushrooms, and the ethics of "doxxing"
Despite bioethical handwringing, they pose no special risks to future generations
Why should an international panel of experts get to decide if you will be allowed to gene-edit your kids?
If Times editors don't want to learn about their genetics, then they simply shouldn't take the tests.
A new international commission will consider the pros and cons of human genome editing.
Parents, not bureaucrats, have the moral authority to decide whether to gene-edit prospective progeny.
Flinging around such terms is not helpful and does not advance the debate.
If it's safe, then it's ethical. No need for a global moratorium.
There is no compelling ethical reason to limit this exercise of reproductive liberty.
A gentleman, a philosopher, a physician, a proud "Texian," a brilliant raconteur, and a clear-eyed defender of liberty has died.
An NPR report on "three-parent babies" in Ukraine provokes bioethical handwringing.
"Governments should follow the principle of regulatory parsimony," two bioethicists argue.
Do you want to be in control group or the experimental group?
Wired's co-founder talks about the "Neobiological Revolution" and what happens when computer science and engineering meet evolution.
What's immoral is telling people they can't get paid for it.
It's past time to tell your anti-GMO friends, family and neighbors they are helping to kill poor people.
If neuropharmaceuticals are ethical, so are machine-brain interface technologies.
Alkahest's vampire cure for aging experiment yields equivocal results
In the case of "head transplants" - it's better to be the "donor" than the recipient.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good agenda-driven story.
People seeking to flourish should have the freedom to enhance their bodies and minds
Breakthrough that could cure genetic diseases before embryos are implanted in their mothers' wombs.
Bioethicists in Britain say yes. But there are no such limits in the U.S. yet.
Will most babies be created using in vitro gametogenesis in 40 years?
Especially if it turns out to be valuable?
Some bioethicists think that 75 years of life is enough for you.
Creation of artificial mouse embryos provokes bioethical handwringing about designer babies
I don't want to have a "conversation" with regulators; I want them to get the hell out of the way
Due to FDA ban parents must resort to treatments abroad in order to have a healthy baby