"Tomorrow We Should Do More" and Other Reasons Gun Rights Folk Mistrust President Obama
Obama's announcement today uses public mass gun murder to buttress irrelevant policies, with vague promises of "more."
Obama's announcement today uses public mass gun murder to buttress irrelevant policies, with vague promises of "more."
The president seeks to encourage psychiatric treatment while increasing the likelihood that it will result in the loss of Second Amendment rights.
The misleading uses, flagrant abuses, and shoddy statistics of social science about gun violence
Public murders committed with guns are used to try to drive gun policy, even though gun policy is powerless to prevent them.
Hateful Eight star explains that gun rights are particularly important in an age of terrorism.
Why are avowed civil libertarians so eager to abandon due process and the Bill of Rights?
You don't have to be a gun-lover to be worried about the vagueness of the language.
You'd think our constitutional expert of a president would have a better grasp of 'due process.'
God didn't reduce gun-violence rates to their lowest levels in 20 years. People and smart policies that liberalized gun laws did that.
Responding to the San Bernardino attack, the president says more people should arbitrarily lose their constitutional rights.
The New York Times complains that Robert Dear owned guns despite "run-ins with the law."
Panic-driven reactions to terrorism that make no sense upon reflection
Daily News sees "sick jihad" behind not letting an unelected official deny rights largely at will.
High Bridge Arms, founded in the mid-1950s by Olympic shooter Bob Chow, shuts down rather than give local police its customer list.
High Bridge Arms, founded in the mid-1950s by Olympic shooter Bob Chow, shuts down rather than give local police its customer list.
The Democratic presidential candidate thinks Australia's mass confiscation of firearms "is a good example."
Second Circuit finds "intermediate scrutiny" of laws impacting Second Amendment allows full ban of certain weapons to pass constitutional muster.
These anti-gun positions haven't traditionally done the Democratic Party much good.
Despite continuing declines in gun violence, Fred Hiatt says enough is enough.
Guns - and the Second Amendment - won't just disappear.
The New York Times, in a not-so-subtle slam against gun rights, says he did.
Like the president, the presumptive Democratic nominee assumes we can identify mass shooters before they strike.
More background checks, more assault weapon bans, more suits against gun makers and sellers, and expanding group of people to whom gun ownership bans apply.
How would the government enforce a limit on the number of firearms people may possess?
Their profile is shared by many people who never kill anyone.
Any attempt to stop would-be murderers from buying guns is bound to be overinclusive, underinclusive, or both.
How can we know simple gun safety laws would help when we know nothing about circumstances of how the killer got the gun?
During the Miss America contest, the contestant said no to banning "military-style assault weapons."
But people with an "interest in eluding law enforcement" might not.
Judge not sure that government preventing the distribution of software files related to 3D-printing a pistol violates First or Second Amendment.
Should "unlawful users" of "controlled substances" automatically lose their Second Amendment rights?
Cody Wilson's legal team explains why the State Department should stop violating his-and our-First and Second Amendment rights over 3D printing files.
The logic may lean that way, but we can't be sure the Court values the Second Amendment's application that strongly.
The dragnet would ensnare many harmless people without having a significant impact on gun violence.
The urge to "do something" after the Charleston church attack inspires half-baked proposals.
A much-hyped new Violence Policy Center study grossly misses the point about guns' value in self-defense.
Probably not: "I don't think it's an answer," says the former Bush adviser.
"You can't have a bunch of people walking around with guns," Hillary's husband says.
The Supreme Court misses an opportunity to defend the Second Amendment.
If cops and prosecutors can't agree on whether his knife was legal, how was he supposed to know?
Preliminary Injunction Gained by Second Amendment Foundation Against D.C. Requirement to Have "Good Reason" To Exercise Second Amendment Right.
Threatening the 3D weapon guru over gunmaking files on the Internet violates his First Amendment rights--and everyone's Second Amendment rights
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks