The Scandalous Science Behind Nuclear Regulation
A flawed scientific model continues to hinder the nuclear power industry and shape policy, holding us all back.
A flawed scientific model continues to hinder the nuclear power industry and shape policy, holding us all back.
And in the process, it will stifle innovation and competition.
"Following the science" as the Supreme Court considers the safety and efficacy of medical abortions.
AEI's Tony Mills and British biochemist Terence Kealey debate whether science needs government funding.
AEI's Tony Mills and British biochemist Terence Kealey debate whether science needs government funding.
A separation of science and politics might be called for.
The Supreme Court is agnostic on questions of science, but clear and resolute on questions of law.
Public officials concealed their conflicts of interest and role in funding research that may have caused the pandemic, says health reporter Emily Kopp.
The first innovative nuclear reactors designed by American companies may well begin operation in Eastern Europe before they get built in Idaho.
A bipartisan bill aimed to help the U.S. “compete” with China would only slow down scientific progress.
Such scientific ignorance is common in th US as well, and can have a harmful influence on government policy.
Environmental Protection Agency
Congress wants to know if the agency is strengthening transparency or silencing science.
People are happier, healthier, and wealthier because freer markets have opened the floodgates of innovation, research, and development.
The result is consistent with lots of other evidence of widespread ignorance and bias influencing public opinion on political and scientific issues.
Academic publishers are "still acting as if the internet doesn't exist," says Michael Eisen, co-founder of the Public Library of Science.
Environmental Protection Agency
Scott Pruitt blocks EPA-funded researchers from serving on the agency's advisory boards.
It would be ridiculous for the Trump Administration to try to suppress it now.
Do researchers risk becoming just another leftwing interest group?
Another update on the 'settled science' of climate change
The new report appears to be a parting gift to anti-fracking activists from the Obama administration.
Wikileaks reveals how activists orchestrated a campaign to silence climate researcher Roger Pielke Jr.
Massie hasn't met with anyone from the Trump transition team.
Compare his answers with Clinton, Trump, and Stein over at ScienceDebate.org
"Science isn't self-correcting, it's self-destructing."
"Science, the pride of modernity, our one source of objective knowledge, is in deep trouble."
Are the Democrats really the Party of Science?
If not for Federal Aviation Administration meddling in supersonic flight innovation, we could zip around the world in a fraction of the time.
No mandatory GMO labels, no energy subsidies, open Yucca Mountain, encourage thorium reactors, etc.
What did 'climate hero' James Hansen actually predict back in 1986?
Libertarian Party presidential candidate scores pretty well.
Climate change, GMOs, Yucca Mountain, vaccination, fetal pain, evolution, and Ebola
More, better, and safer food - but only if regulators will stay out of the way.
Comparing his scores on seven science policy topics to Cruz, Rubio, and Bush
A debate over biotechnology previews the regulatory innovation that could stop innovation
A scitech research and policy round up for January 7, 2016
A scitech research and policy roundup for January 6, 2016
A scitech research and policy round up for January 5, 2016
I'm a bioethicist, and I am here to help slow down scientific and medical progress
Agency still treats consumers like idiots
Why privilege solar over all the other technologies, including some that may not even be invented yet?
$28 billion in research funding wasted every year.
Is life better than death; health better disease; wealth better than poverty? Opinions vary.
Environmental activists favor secret science
Testing company 23andMe expresses its gratitude
Disinformation specialists are everywhere
(You don't really have to shut up, but here's my money.)
Yes, I'll donate to Reason right now! I'll keep my money today, thanksReason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksHelp Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksReason is the antidote to the same old stale take on ideas that actually matter to me.
I’ll support Free Minds and Free Markets! Not interestedReason pushes me to think critically with facts and analysis that shape my perspective and amplify the ideas I care about.
I want to make a donation so that my voice can be heard! Not todayEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedIt’s hard to trust the media these days, especially when everyone is pushing a partisan agenda. Reason stands for my right to make my own choices.
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No, I’ll follow the partisan herdReason’s fearless, principled journalism keeps me sane in a crazy world.
Making a donation to Reason right now will keep me from losing my mind! No, I like being madSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksSupport the voices that advocate for your freedom. Donate to Reason today!
Yes, I want to make a difference for Free Minds and Free Markets! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today