Texas and Florida Say the First Amendment Must Be Sacrificed to Save It
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
The Supreme Court seems inclined to recognize that content moderation is protected by the First Amendment.
A new economic paper explains why interest rates are the missing piece to understanding why people are unhappy about a seemingly strong economy.
Plus: Migrant resettlement, Tom Cotton op-ed scandal, oppressors-in-training, and more...
Byron Tau's Means of Control documents how the private sector helps government agencies keep tabs on American citizens.
The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.
Both states are trying to force tech companies to platform certain sorts of speech.
A Biden administration ploy could give the federal government control over drug prices.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo says more chip subsidies are needed, even before the Biden administration has distributed $52 billion or measured how effective that spending was.
Plus: Russian sanctions, Finnish gun ranges, Milei supremacy, and more...
It's part of the government's expensive public-private partnership meant to address concerns over a reliance on foreign countries, like China, for semiconductors.
State Supreme Court Chief Justice Tom Parker cited the Bible to explain why.
Misled by a bad law, graduate students are drowning in debt.
Many apps collect data that is then accessed by outside entities. Should you care?
Plus: A listener asks if the editors have criteria for what constitutes a good law.
Plus: Catholic funeral for transgender activist, Donald Trump's props, deep tech in El Segundo, and more...
In The Experience Machine, philosopher and scientist Andy Clark offers an updated theory of mind.
And a federal judge just said so.
From limits on liability protections for websites to attempts to regulate the internet like a public utility, these proposals will erode Americans' right to express themselves.
The president criticized companies for selling "smaller-than-usual products" whose "price stays the same." But it was his and his predecessor's spending policies that caused the underlying issue.
"None of these laws prevent kids from viewing anything. They just prevent kids from posting," argues Shoshana Weissmann.
Banning people under age 16 from accessing social media without parental consent "is a breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing potential harms, the judge writes.
Plus: A listener asks if the state of Oregon’s policy on drug decriminalization should be viewed as a success.
Sen. Mike Lee's "technological exploitation" bill also redefines consent.
It was a week of bad news for the president. Fortunately for him, he probably won’t remember.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
The jury found no real damages, but gave a sizeable punitive award that could be challenged on appeal.
Throughout Republican-run Western states, lawmakers are passing legislation that treats adults as if they are children.
Interest in virtual private networks provides insights into a global battle over digital freedom.
More like total eclipse of the fun.
The Biden administration's interference with bookselling harks back to a 1963 Supreme Court case involving literature that Rhode Island deemed dangerous.
AI tools churning out images of fake IDs could help people get around online age-check laws.
As the party grows more populist, ethnically diverse, and working class, will Republicans abandon their libertarian economic principles?
Plus: A listener asks if it should become the norm for all news outlets to require journalists to disclose their voting records.
"You need meat, OK? We're going to have meat in Florida," DeSantis said during a press conference.
Officials admitted at COP28 that they are not "on track" to achieving climate goals. And they are not likely to be any time soon.
AEI's Tony Mills and British biochemist Terence Kealey debate whether science needs government funding.
Plus: Republicans are trying to expand a tax deduction they once wanted to cap, a "shocking" and "stunning" January jobs report, and street blocking protestors in D.C.
The verdict vindicates the constitutional rights that Louisiana sheriff's deputies flagrantly violated when they hauled Waylon Bailey off to jail.
Health reporter Emily Kopp and biologist Alex Washburne discuss new documents that detail plans to manipulate bat-borne coronaviruses in Wuhan on the latest episode of Just Asking Questions.
Republicans and Democrats are using emotional manipulation to push an agenda of censorship.
Hasan Minhaj’s stand-up tests the boundaries of fact and fiction.
Don't let a moral panic shut everything down.
Priscilla Villarreal, also known as "Lagordiloca," has sparked a debate about free speech and who, exactly, is a journalist.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks