SCOTUS Ponders Whether the Biden Administration Coerced Social Media Platforms To Censor Speech
Several justices seemed concerned that an injunction would interfere with constitutionally permissible contacts.
Several justices seemed concerned that an injunction would interfere with constitutionally permissible contacts.
Plus: A listener asks about Republicans and Democrats monopolizing political power in the United States.
The company leaves Texas over an “ineffective, haphazard, and dangerous” age-verification law.
Plus: Space dining, Russian elections, Bernie Sanders' 32-hour workweek, and more...
The newspaper portrays the constitutional challenge to the government's social media meddling as a conspiracy by Donald Trump's supporters.
Some Democrats want to mimic Europe's policies on phone chargers and more.
It took the Air Force four years to release redacted records of its quest to create spiffy new uniforms for the newest branch of the military.
"It's a disturbing gift of unprecedented authority to President Biden and the Surveillance State," said Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.).
Plus: Kamala Harris' abortion clinic visit, Karl Marx's hypocrisy, CDC data struggles, and more...
"Following the science" as the Supreme Court considers the safety and efficacy of medical abortions.
Instead of freeing Americans from censorship, the TikTok bill would tighten the U.S. government's control over social media.
Another blow to the idea that algorithms are driving our political dysfunction.
New immigration pathways are letting private citizens welcome refugees and other migrants—and getting the government out of the way.
Even as they attack the Biden administration's crusade against "misinformation," Missouri and Louisiana defend legal restrictions on content moderation.
"Laws like this don't solve the problems they try to address but only make them worse," says a Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression attorney.
After the Alabama Supreme Court ruled in February that frozen embryos were children, legislators scrambled to protect in vitro fertilization clinics.
The Royalty Transparency Act passed unanimously out of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee yesterday.
A new bill would ban TikTok and give the president power to declare other social media apps off limits.
"People are not in politics for truth-seeking reasons," argues the data journalist and author of On The Edge: The Art of Risking Everything.
There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents an inmate from winning the presidency.
A law forcing kids off social media sites is still likely coming to Florida.
"It is immoral that in a poor country like ours," the Argentine president said, "the government spends the people's money to buy the will of journalists."
Two libertarian experts on public ignorance continue a debate about conformism.
Plus: Putin threatens nukes, D.C. mulls a crackdown on theft, Bloomberg blames right-wingers, and more...
What if Russia had landed on the moon before the United States?
Bryan Johnson, venture capitalist and founder of Blueprint, discusses his $2 million a year effort to reverse aging on Just Asking Questions.
While a disappointment to green-tech supporters, Apple's decision reflects the growing uncertainty in the E.V. market.
The First Amendment restricts governments, not private platforms, and respects editorial rights.
Supreme Court arguments about two social media laws highlight a dangerous conflation of state and private action.
Maybe the problem for teens isn't screens, but what they are replacing.
The Supreme Court seems inclined to recognize that content moderation is protected by the First Amendment.
A new economic paper explains why interest rates are the missing piece to understanding why people are unhappy about a seemingly strong economy.
Plus: Migrant resettlement, Tom Cotton op-ed scandal, oppressors-in-training, and more...
Byron Tau's Means of Control documents how the private sector helps government agencies keep tabs on American citizens.
The laws violate the First Amendment because they require social media sites to abjure most content moderation, and platform speech they disapprove of.
Both states are trying to force tech companies to platform certain sorts of speech.
A Biden administration ploy could give the federal government control over drug prices.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo says more chip subsidies are needed, even before the Biden administration has distributed $52 billion or measured how effective that spending was.
Plus: Russian sanctions, Finnish gun ranges, Milei supremacy, and more...
It's part of the government's expensive public-private partnership meant to address concerns over a reliance on foreign countries, like China, for semiconductors.
State Supreme Court Chief Justice Tom Parker cited the Bible to explain why.
Misled by a bad law, graduate students are drowning in debt.
Many apps collect data that is then accessed by outside entities. Should you care?
Plus: A listener asks if the editors have criteria for what constitutes a good law.
Plus: Catholic funeral for transgender activist, Donald Trump's props, deep tech in El Segundo, and more...
In The Experience Machine, philosopher and scientist Andy Clark offers an updated theory of mind.
And a federal judge just said so.
From limits on liability protections for websites to attempts to regulate the internet like a public utility, these proposals will erode Americans' right to express themselves.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10