California Considers Mandatory Warning Labels for Sugary Drinks
Because people just don't know.
Because people just don't know.
Did not actually get covered in January
For "failure to ensure adequate network coverage"
At this point the thing is going to repeal itself
Mascot for atheists deemed "religiously offensive"
Nevertheless, voters support the law
The value of life is determined not by the mere drawing of one breath after another, but by the freedom to make our own decisions.
There are few issues that are as riddled with outright claptrap as the scare about what smokers' puffing is doing to innocent non-smokers.
Run afoul of anti-money-laundering regulations
Pleads not guilty to various black market charges
Taxi industry protectionism in the Peach State
Chicago and Georgia taxi drivers try to shut down the competition
For when they're stolen, of course
One a proposal from the Drug Policy Alliance
Supporters argue it helps the criminals and reduces recidivism by giving them health coverage
An FBI agent literally checked the wrong box and ruined a woman's life
In order to stave off fear-based, unscientific federal mandates
Half of them have disciplinary histories or unsatisfactory records
An industry not under government control? We can't allow that.
To "force the issue" of whether the country sees the journalist as a criminal
Government (so far) doesn't micromanage who you share your food with.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.