11 Big SCOTUS Cases That Will Be Decided Soon
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
From immigration and guns to executive power, transgender athletes, and mail-in ballots, these are the Supreme Court cases to watch out for in May and June.
The party of fiscal responsibility strikes again.
The rich pay more than their "fair share."
An initiative that would streamline California's development-killing environmental review law appears to be headed to the ballot.
Angst, guilt, and more self-awareness than you might expect
The justice defends the Supreme Court as a model of respectful and principled adjudication.
Congress hasn't voted to declare war since 1942, yet the legislative branch constantly refuses to rein in presidents.
How heavy-handed state regulations led to one farmer suing the state for $3 million in damages
The Court responds to the mifepristone shadow docket filings.
Plus: Supreme Court pauses ban on mail-order abortion pills, TikTok's artistic merit, a defense of pickup artists, and more...
The Supreme Court justice discusses the Declaration of Independence, how unchecked power threatens liberty, and what the Founders can teach future generations.
“Bye!” Mayor Katie Wilson says with a wave to those who want out.
Drug makers seek interim relief after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit blocks FDA rule allowing mifepristone prescriptions via telemedicine. (With Update Below.)
The restrictions are often framed as a crime prevention measure. But the fine print points to a different motivation: adding union jobs.
The appellate court rightly concludes that Gordon-Darby's lawsuit had multiple legal problems.
It limits executive power grabs in this field, as well as others.
Legally, Trump must either cease operations or ask Congress for approval. He did neither, and Congress just went on recess.
Cole Tomas Allen's actions just don't make sense, even in his own words, or in a time of political polarization.
In a bid to “reaffirm its exclusive jurisdiction” over prediction markets such as Kalshi, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is suing six states for interfering in federally regulated financial markets.
Bootleggers, Baptists, and the fight over who gets to write America's self-driving car rules.
Department of Homeland Security
Plus: FISA reauthorization, driverless trucks in California, and an Epstein suicide note.
Foreign Law in American Courts
An interesting illustration of how American courts handle (correctly, I think) foreign marriages.
After California made this same mistake in 1999, it took 12 years to dig out of the hole. Taxpayers footed the bill.
The term “hate speech” gets thrown around a lot, but it’s legally protected in the U.S.
Mere proposals can change the risk calculus for business and investors. Politicians, and the public, should be wary.
Europe’s resistance to immigration is a path to budgetary disaster.
Plus: The Supreme Court says “demands for a charity’s private member or donor information” raises First Amendment problems.
Making less harmful products harder to get pushes people toward more dangerous ones.
“The sale of E15 year-round would help the ethanol industry and no one else,” says one agricultural policy expert.
The Trump Administration is refusing to defend a D.C. Circuit decision upholding a flawed energy conservation ruie.
The brief, which asks a federal judge to reconsider an injunction blocking the project, reads like it was transcribed from the president's Truth Social account.
Conservative legal commentator Gregg Nunziata outlines reasons why conservatives should reject broad views of executive power.
Beyond Belief explains how the "evidence revolution" is helping practitioners, policymakers, and the public understand what really works.
The government wants access to millions of cell phone location histories. The Supreme Court will decide what the Fourth Amendment allows.
Federal law defines the term but there is no federal statute to charge someone with "domestic terrorism."
Even Republican critics of the Federal Reserve chairman's performance rejected the notion that he had broken the law by lying about the renovation of the central bank's headquarters.
Small-government conservatives are tripping over themselves to give millions of taxpayer dollars to billionaires.
A retired liberal justice does not credit the shadow docket hysteria, nor does former Judge Michael McConnell
Some states still allow vengeful spouses to sue a third party for destroying their marriages.
The feds have been demanding that tech companies identify the administration's anonymous online critics. That violates the First Amendment.
To justify punishing a legislator for his speech, a FIRE brief notes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth relies on a Supreme Court precedent that is clearly inapposite.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.