Trump's Use of the Alien Enemies Act Violates Madison's View of Presidential Power
Alleged criminal aliens may face legal punishment. But only after receiving due process of law.
Alleged criminal aliens may face legal punishment. But only after receiving due process of law.
The president is arguing in court that journalism he doesn't like is "election interference" that constitutes consumer fraud.
Donald Trump is determined to make everything from Canadian whiskey to Mexican avocados more expensive. Can anyone stop him?
Evan Bernick's first in a series of guest-blogging post: Part I of a critique of an important defense of the constitutionality of Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
A leading expert on habeas corpus explains why the Trump Administration is wrong to claim the case must be heard in Texas, rather than Washington, DC.
An economist explores how a stable and relatively just legal order emerged in medieval Japan.
and then lied to parents about what was happening." Because some claims remain undecided in trial court, the court of appeals holds it lacks jurisdiction over the appeal.
The Court's opinion upholding federal regulation of "ghost guns" makes passing reference to Loper Bright Enterprises.
The 2-1 ruling is procedural, but strongly suggests the majority judges also reject the Trump administration's position on the merits.
Legislators have used the state Constitution to avoid accountability for egregious traffic violations.
An interesting new study on how state bar requirements may affect the quality and quantity of legal services.
Judge Boasberg ruled the migrants are entitled to due process in determing whether they really are "alien enemies" covered by the Act.
that's likely just the tip of the iceberg.
An unconstitutional act is still unconstitutional even if lots of people support it.
After Assad’s fall, Syria was poised for liberation. Instead, ethnic violence, sectarian dogma, and unchecked power are threatening to turn victory into yet another nightmare.
The White House accidentally leaked military plans in Yemen to a journalist—and demonstrated how unconstitutional U.S. war making has become.
Plus: A listener asks why some American libertarians seem to unquestioningly accept everything Vladimir Putin says.
Over 500,000 migrants used the program to enter and work in the U.S.
The judge ruled that Donald Trump and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's executive orders targeting "gender ideology" can't change the fact that drag performance is expressive conduct under the First Amendment.
A response to Joel Alicea on whether originalism needs a moral defense.
Two decisions respecting a denial of certiorari suggest the Court should reconstruct Confrontation Clause jurisprudence.
State Attorneys General appear more interested in lining up with their political tribe than they are in defending state interests.
The court concludes that the federal 2005 Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act preempts state battery claims, but not state constitutional law claims.
The feds have no constitutional authorization to meddle in education.
Across the country, parents of gender-dysphoric kids are confronting state intrusion.
To justify the immediate deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, the president is invoking a rarely used statute that does not seem to apply in this context.
Invoking the Defense Production Act won't boost the supply of critical minerals.
While he can't get rid of the department outright, a new executive order attempts the next best thing.
Links to audios of a Cato Institute podcast and an interview with ABC News (Australia).
The participants were Adam Cox (NYU) and myself.
California once was the state where a visionary might start up a gee-whiz concept in a garage. Now bureaucrats and powerful unions would crush that concept in its infancy.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation requires the right for the government to terminate any federal contract "for convenience."
Linda Martin's lawsuit alleges that the agency violated her right to due process when it took her $40,200 and sent her a notice failing to articulate the reason.
Superintendents warned open enrollment would overwhelm them. Instead, they have nearly 3,000 vacancies as parents and students have more choices.
More education dollars are funding more bureaucrats, who, by and large, are not improving student outcomes.
"Impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision," Roberts noted after Trump said federal judges who impede his agenda should be fired.
The removals challenge Humphrey’s Executor, a Supreme Court precedent that protects independent agency officials from political firings.
President Trump acts to remove two Democratic commissioners from the Federal Trade Commission. Litigation is likely.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jill Parrish emphasizes that religious freedom must protect "unpopular or unfamiliar religious groups" as well as "popular or familiar ones."
In 2020, the Chief Justice condemned Senator Schumer's "dangerous" remarks.
There is no justification for such impeachment efforts.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10