Court Rejects Oklahoma Education Department's Lawsuit Over Letters from Advocacy Group
"How do Defendant's letters interfere with Plaintiffs' authority or ability to administer Oklahoma's public schools?"
"How do Defendant's letters interfere with Plaintiffs' authority or ability to administer Oklahoma's public schools?"
for "citing to fabricated, AI-generated cases without verifying the accuracy, or even the existence, of the cases" and "misrepresenting to the Court the origin of the AI-generated cases."
Did they have a point?
The Sixth Circuit wrestles with what it means for a regulation to be "substantially the same" as one disapproved by Congress.
My Cato Institute colleague Walter Olson explains.
My new paper on judicial independence as a constitutional construction.
Younger Americans seem ready to treat the program as a safety net, not a retirement plan.
Glenn Greenwald debates Anna Gorisch on Trump's deportation policies.
The judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit split over whether they should write about the reasons for their splitting over en banc review.
The president is on a record-shattering pace for executive actions.
The words national emergency are not a magic spell that presidents can utter to unlock unlimited legislative powers for themselves.
The federal government has embraced unconstitutional tactics and now wants SCOTUS to do the same.
If Sen. Josh Hawley and the Trump administration want to spare Americans the pain from tariffs, there is a far simpler solution.
It's a drop in the bucket compared to the national debt, but any wasteful government spending should be eliminated.
Can a hotel be guilty of sex trafficking just because it didn't surveil its customers enough?
A bit of cold water on a popular Court "reform" from a justice on the left-wing of the Court
An easy way to avoid the merits in the latest high-stake health care litigation.
A mom who trusted her kids to play outside ended up under repeated investigation.
For years, the president has rightly railed against those oppressive regimes. So why is his administration targeting their victims?
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against any additional construction at the immigration detention center amid plans to increase the facility’s capacity to 4,000 detainees.
Judge Katsas and Judge Rao disagreed on the reasons, but both agreed that Judge Boasberg overstepped; Judge Pillard dissented.
Using the FBI to track down AWOL Texas Democrats is an unnecessary expansion of federal law enforcement authority.
When the line between public and private is erased, politics is all about special favors. That's gross.
Courts don't need to stretch the ministerial exception to cover every case.
The Constitution requires apportionment to be based on a count of all "persons," excluding only "Indians not taxed."
A federal court clears the way for a broader legal challenge to Trump’s refugee policies, even as Afghans in the U.S. face detention, expired protections, and rising fears of deportation.
No, says a Delaware judge: "Civil rights statutes" "do not eclipse the constitutional protections of the right to petition the government."
Does the First Amendment freedom of expressive association protect religious hiring?
The Commerce Clause protects free trade between the states.
You could travel to a foreign country, or you could create your own.
A costly lease for the Maryland Department of Health, along with other findings in a state audit, raises questions about the millions in savings touted by Maryland Gov. Wes Moore.
In a rare and significant decision, a federal court ruled Brandon Fulton can sue directly under the Takings Clause—without Congress creating a specific remedy.
Does the church-autonomy doctrine extend to hiring decisions outside the ministerial exception?
The president is claiming "unbounded authority" to impose import taxes based on a law that does not mention them.
A textualist solution to controversies over religious hiring.
A federal court says U.S. citizens “are likely to succeed in showing” that immigration agents violated their rights.
Joe and Russell Marino will finally get their day in court. The ruling represents a turning of the tide when it comes to the fairness of such proceedings, where agencies have long played both prosecutor and jury.
"[T]he sheer breadth of the discovery sought in Türkiye's Application, considered in light of the colorable allegations of political motivation presented in support of Turkyolu's motion, weighs heavily against the Application at this time."
The turning point was the New Deal.
An important church–state question likely headed to the Supreme Court.
Websites are being told to create "Material Harmful to Minors tax accounts."
President Trump’s invocation of emergency powers to impose tariffs faces skeptical judges.