The D.C. Circuit Unanimously Rejects Trump's Audacious Presidential Immunity Claim
The appeals court says it "cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter."
The appeals court says it "cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter."
A watchdog group cites ATF "whistleblowers" who describe a proposed policy that would be plainly inconsistent with federal law.
Under the Controlled Substances Act, the agency does not have the discretion to "deschedule marijuana altogether."
Should there be any limits to a president's power to centrally plan the economy? Apparently not.
People who were disenfranchised based on felony convictions face a new obstacle to recovering their voting rights.
His understanding of effective leadership and policing should repel anyone who cares about civil liberties and the rule of law.
Qualified immunity is a badly flawed doctrine the Supreme Court should abolish. But Trump's demands are much more extreme.
Republican Presidential Nomination
Plus: Javier Milei’s powerful speech on economic prosperity in Davos
The former president argues that accountability is the enemy of effectiveness, both for cops and for politicians.
Excessive judicial deference gives administrative agencies a license to rewrite the law in their favor.
The answer is likely "no" for US military action so far, because it is a defense against attack. But a broader conflict or one of much longer duration would be different.
Step 1: Become president. That's the hardest part.
As one appeals court judge pointed out, Trump's defense could literally let a president get away with murder.
Instead of indulging in politically risky sedition prosecutions of the black press, the government relied on indirect methods of behind-the-scenes manipulation and intimidation.
The reason is a combination of the general structure of our legal system and the original meaning of Section 3.
His lawyers say no jury can ever consider charges based on his "official acts" as president, which include his efforts to reverse Joe Biden's election.
It's a commendable, but very modest, expansion of a step he took last year.
The pardons freed no prisoners, but the White House says they will ease the burden of a criminal record.
Harvard law Prof. Larry Lessig's attempt to prove otherwise misfires.
Plus: A listener asks the editors to consider the libertarian argument against shopping local.
The Court agreed to the special counsel's request for expedited briefing on whether to grant certiorari.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected the former President's attempt to claim presidential immunity covered his conduct on January 6.
Should a federal government that is nearly $34 trillion in debt and can't manage basic operations be micromanaging fast-food business purchases?
The Trump administration’s unilateral ban on bump stocks turned owners of those rifle accessories into felons.
Plus: A listener asks the editors about requiring gun buyers to pass a psychological assessment.
If Joe Manchin or Larry Hogan thinks he’ll be elected on a No Labels ticket, he’ll be sorely disappointed.
Newsom vetoed both reforms, which he deemed excessively permissive.
After five years without net neutrality rules, the fix for a problem that doesn’t exist is back.
A Republican, a Communist, and a Catholic conservative walk onto a movie set...
The governor's attempt to rule by decree provoked widespread condemnation instead of the applause she was expecting.
"He said, you strike, you're fired. Simple concept to me. To the extent that we can use that once again, absolutely."
The former president suggests he was not obliged to obey a subpoena seeking classified records.
New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham thinks violent crime gives her a license to rule by decree.
Politicians are throwing laws at the wall and seeing what sticks.
While there is some genuine politicization, it is not as great as often claimed. Proposals to undermine judicial review could easily end up empowering the very sort of authoritarian president progressives fear.
The lack of oversight and the general absence of a long-term vision is creating inefficiency, waste, and red ink as far as the eye can see.
Survey data casts doubt on the textualist rationale for the major questions doctrine that I and others have advanced. But perhaps not as much doubt as it might seem.
Plus: Why don't journalists support free speech anymore?
It has many good points. But I have some reservations and questions.
Donald Trump commuted Philip Esformes' sentence, but the Justice Department is bent on sending him back to prison.
A group of senators is challenging the conventional interpretation of Article 5's an-attack-on-one-is-an-attack-on-all provision.
The Court unanimously ruled the plaintiffs in that case lacked standing. But they might end up getting what they wanted more fully than anyone else involved in the legal battle over student loan forgiveness.
The article goes over the main reasons why the Court's decision was justified.
The administration will try this pathway as an alternative to the HEROES Act of 2003, which pathway was shut down by today's Supreme Court decision.
The 8-1 decision is a major win for Biden and executive enforcement discretion. I think the Court got the right result, but for the wrong reasons.
By taking records that did not belong to him and refusing to return them, William Barr says, Trump "provoked this whole problem himself."
The constitutional lawyer and criminal justice reformer talks about our two-tier punishment system and deep-seated corruption at the Justice Department.
The real banana republic danger is if high officials can commit serious crimes with impunity.