How Will Congress Fund a $300 Billion War With Iran?
Lawmakers used to offset its emergency spending. They don't anymore.
Lawmakers used to offset its emergency spending. They don't anymore.
The ability to get home should not be a privilege contingent on the political moment.
This heavy-handed legislation would harm Americans, not protect them.
Plus: Meta and Google found liable, what the verdict means, an OnlyFans-style campaign website, and more...
Plus: What George Orwell thought about Friedrich Hayek.
I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon.
But "evidence related to his political activities, attendance at Burning Man in 2017, and relationship with Shivon Zilis" will be allowed.
"It appears that the Court’s prior admonitions and sanctions have had little, if any, remedial impact."
Meta's loss in a New Mexico "product design" case could also be a blow against Section 230, free speech, and online privacy.
The president and his new DHS secretary are enraged by jurists and legislators who refuse to toe the party line.
With the Pentagon's track record, lawmakers are right to be skeptical.
with cameo appearance by out-of-jurisdiction counsel's citation of non-existent cases.
The lawsuit alleges that the city has a history of silencing pro-Palestine speech.
From Korea to Iran, the United States has employed countless euphemisms that not only obscure the true nature of its wars but also the constitutional limits designed to constrain them.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
The court's reasoning mostly turns on a conclusion that much of the prison behavior that plaintiffs complained about wasn't dictated by that particular law.
From a termination of parental rights decision by the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Hochul invited those who opposed her policies to leave. Many did. Now she wants them back.
No single government controls the South Pole, so how do they deal with crime?
The Trump administration wants its federal funding back from Harvard, alleging the Ivy League university did "nothing" about campus antisemitism.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
The president says federal courts should not make decisions based on partisan considerations unless it benefits him.
California initiatives will fuel an already fiery November election, and the state's top-two primary might end up excluding Democrats in the governor's race.
His work further demonstrates that the AEA cannot be used in response to illegal migration or drug smuggling, but only when there is a military attack.
This week, senators heard testimony over the foundation for modern online conversations.
"If we can do this for a dog, why aren't we rolling this out to all humans with cancer?"
While he admits New York is facing a “serious fiscal crisis,” Mamdani’s solutions won’t actually fix it.
"He can't bring himself to say we shouldn't settle political questions with violence," said Paul.
The Republican stalwart thought he could wield more power from the Senate than he ever could from the Supreme Court.
In a letter to senators, the administration offered five concessions—two of which were simply that going forward, officers would follow the law.
Department of Homeland Security
The Oklahoma senator, nominated to replace Kristi Noem, is blasé about the use of deadly force.
Loomer had entered into a non-disparagement agreement to settle an earlier case, and the agreement had been adopted as a court order, but it also had an exception for statements responding to CAIR's statements about her.
The bill creates a new program to increase agency spending on small businesses, particularly those owned by women, minorities, and disabled veterans.
Plus: An effective build-to-rent ban advances in Congress and Florida expands one of the country's most successful zoning reforms.
Plus: Brian Doherty, RIP.
"Freedom of speech and of press is accorded aliens residing in this country," according to a 1945 Supreme Court ruling.
His push relies on dubious data about the pills' safety.
The article explains how all the standard arguments for denying birthright ctizenship to children of undocumented immigrants are at odds with the main purpose of the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
More than eight decades ago, the Supreme Court invented a vague First Amendment exception that would-be censors continue to invoke.
Gov. Mikie Sherrill called Big Tech worse than Big Tobacco before proposing measures to regulate social media platforms.
The Texas Court of Appeals just upheld the order.
Outgoing President Gabriel Boric predicted that Chile would go from being neoliberalism’s “cradle” to its “grave.” His movement got buried instead.
Plus: bad arguments in favor of a build-to-rent ban, a tanker plane crash kills four in Iraq, signs the Iran war isn't going so well, and more...
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks