The Trump Administration Is Abusing a Law To Threaten ICE Protesters. The Cases Are Falling Apart.
The administration doesn't want to win these cases. It wants to intimidate Americans who oppose its immigration policies.
The administration doesn't want to win these cases. It wants to intimidate Americans who oppose its immigration policies.
Contributors include Eugene Volokh and myself, among many others.
A conservative federal judge questions the reach of free speech.
Trump announced neither stimulus checks nor war in Venezuela.
The defense secretary claims the video, which shows a second strike that killed two floundering survivors, would compromise "sources and methods."
"To hold otherwise would allow police officers to demand identification from anyone near a school while using a smartphone—parents taking first-day-of-school videos, a grandparent trying to pull up directions while in the school drop-off line, or dog walkers holding their phone near their chest."
From birthright citizenship to tariffs, many of the president’s key policies run counter to the Constitution’s original meaning.
Only time will tell if the president's order achieves its stated purpose of checking state laws that threaten to stymie innovation.
The back-to-back setbacks are a striking sign that the mortgage fraud charges against New York's attorney general are legally shaky.
The version of the NDAA passed by the House is larger than the administration’s budget request.
The Supreme Court should take a page from its own history.
Trump isn’t the first president to pick energy winners and losers, but he should be the last.
Calling suspected cocaine smugglers "combatants" does not justify summarily executing them.
So far, by the president's reckoning, he has prevented 650,000 U.S. drug deaths—eight times the number recorded last year.
Why the Executive Power Vesting clause of Article II compels a holding that the President has the power to remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter.
The claim is "iffy" partly because part of the plaintiff's argument is that ... ChatGPT said the award was likely AI-generated.
The freedom to build in-law suites and home additions is crucial, even if it doesn't get us all the way to housing "abundance."
Plus: It's the final day of Reason's webathon.
The footage shows what happened to the survivors of the September 2 attack that inaugurated the president's deadly campaign against suspected drug boats.
Plus: Hep B vaccines, national parks nonsense, Trump involvement in Netflix deal, and more...
Democrats retook full control in Richmond and are already advancing right-to-work repeal, testing whether incoming Gov. Abigail Spanberger will stand by her campaign promise.
The commander who ordered a second missile strike worried that the helpless men he killed might be able to salvage cocaine from the smoldering wreck.
On the eve of Trump v. Slaughter, the D.C. Circuit offers a way to distinguish Humphrey's Executor.
You don't have to like the Muslim Brotherhood or the Council on American-Islamic Relations to think the government should be required to prove accusations before punishing people.
The magistrate judge is not amused.
Adm. Frank M. Murphy reportedly told lawmakers a controversial second strike was necessary because drugs on the burning vessel remained a threat.
Without federal preemption, a regulatory thicket of state AI laws threatens to slow the technology's development.
If you get into an elite college, you probably don't have a learning disability.
Plus: It’s webathon time.
The progressive advocacy group thinks voting for any Trump judicial nominees is inexcusable.
Regardless of what the defense secretary knew or said about the September 2 boat attack, the forces he commands are routinely committing murder in the guise of self-defense.
New data display the failures of the expanded Discovery Program.
The 3rd Circuit’s ruling against Alina Habba highlights a disturbing pattern of legal evasion.
Instead of asking whether a particular boat attack went too far, Congress should ask how the summary execution of criminal suspects became the new normal.
FTC staff support the proposal by the Texas Supreme Court to allow for alternative means of accreditation.
The Supreme Court’s power to nullify legislative and executive acts is inherent in the Constitution.
Even if you accept the president's assertion of an "armed conflict" with drug smugglers, blowing apart survivors of a boat strike would be a war crime.
The Circuit's decision appears to invite the workaround of dividing responsibilities between two persons in the U.S. Attorney's Office, who could then each exercise half of that Office's powers.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks