Bernie Sanders Is Lying About AI Data Centers
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss why AI data centers spark joy, their favorite Black Mirror episodes, and libertarian skepticism of the Epstein files release.
Robby Soave and Christian Britschgi discuss why AI data centers spark joy, their favorite Black Mirror episodes, and libertarian skepticism of the Epstein files release.
The president's wildly inaccurate ideological labels are no more meaningful than his other ad hominem attacks on people who disagree with him.
Stephen Miller's wife is giving renewables a P.R. boost.
Judge McCafferty refuses to stay her unconstitutional injunction, and it appears the state AG's office is still failing to raise its strongest constitutional defense.
More habeas corpus petitions were filed over the last year than in the past three administrations combined because of the administration's mass detention policy.
Professor Michael Ramsey revisits the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause.
A discussion of the [shadow/interim/emergency/other] docket with Professor Kate Shaw.
Plus: AI layoffs, Paramount wins Warner Bros., and the Trump-Mamdani bromance.
The world is growing simultaneously more corrupt and bound in red tape. That’s not a coincidence.
I was one of the participants, along with Zach Shemtob (SCOTUSblog) and Julie SIlverbrook (NCC).
Gregg Nunziata interviewed me.
American businesses and consumers absorbed nearly 90 percent of the 2025 tariffs' economic burden, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found.
A war powers resolution has been stuck in Congress—and Democrats are reportedly happy to let Trump walk into a quagmire.
Federal officials enjoy too much immunity from being sued over their misconduct.
The "State of the Swamp" event highlights the power and limits of absurdity and whimsy in political protest.
It said that if it lost in court, it would refund companies that paid unlawful tariffs. Now it says the process could take years.
Only time will tell how great the impact of the ruling will really be. But, at this point, it seems like a very significant decision.
Plus: Entitlement reform, gas prices, the Reason SOTU drinking game, robo-vac spies, and more...
Panic over guns drives government officials to propose restricting popular technology.
Although Trump has other options for taxing imports, the justices reminded him that he needs clear congressional authorization.
A drop in seizures doesn't necessarily mean a decline in the supply.
And that's especially true if the tariffs are illegal.
The plan recognizes that public opinion is what's holding data centers back the most.
The president can't just bring prices down with the stroke of his pen, no matter what he claimed in his State of the Union speech.
The Trump administration signals an intent to continue appealing to the mainstream, not the far right, on IVF.
President Donald Trump tossed out a bunch of economic statistics during his State of the Union address. Here are three that are just plain wrong.
Large investors are a small, beneficial presence in the single-family home market.
A 2018 class action lawsuit argued that Chicago was unlawfully overcharging residents for parking and sticker fines.
An attorney and former ICE training instructor testified before Congress that changes to the training program “can and will get people killed.”
The article explains why the new Section 122 tariffs are illegal, and courts should strike them down, when (as is likely) lawsuits are filed against them.
Those expecting fireworks at tonight's State of the Union will have to sit through the tedious resume-padding of a flagging president.
The conservative justice’s regrettable opinion in Learning Resources v. Trump.
The president is relying on a provision that the government's lawyers said had no "obvious application" to his goal of reducing the trade deficit.
Attorneys for the Trump administration even admitted that Section 122 can't be applied to address trade deficits. Trump is now trying to do that anyway.
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County
The president neither understands nor appreciates the vital role of judicial independence in upholding the rule of law.
"Courts cannot accept a model where an entity has a public-facing identity which it then renounces based on its behind-the-scenes activity."
President Trump will undoubtedly keep trying to impose protectionism, but his options are limited.
A couple of lawyers and a couple of scribes discuss the legal challenges to come.
The prominent conservative legal commentator outlines the case against Trump's latest tariff power grab.
It covers many issues raised by the decision.
The legislation would almost certainly lead to a higher cost of living in the form of substantial tax increases.
What explains the fracture in the Supreme Court's "conservative bloc"?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks