Was Censorship the Greatest COVID Threat to Freedom?
It wasn't just autocrats who were frequently tempted to address "fake news" about the pandemic through state pressure and coercion.
It wasn't just autocrats who were frequently tempted to address "fake news" about the pandemic through state pressure and coercion.
The alarm aroused by the Disinformation Governance Board is understandable given the administration’s broader assault on messages it considers dangerous.
Officials in Gallatin County, Montana, say a state law that prohibits local governments from forcing businesses to turn customers away is preventing it from cracking down on zoning code violators.
In a move that is likely to undermine public health, the agency warns that products containing synthetic nicotine "will be subject to FDA enforcement."
"Government restrictions came in, which literally shut us down," says Paul Smith, who co-owns Red Stag Tattoo in Austin, Texas.
The proposed rule, which targets the cigarettes that black smokers overwhelmingly prefer, will harm the community it is supposed to help.
The estimate implies an overall infection fatality rate of about 0.5 percent, although that number should be viewed with caution.
Menthols aren’t harder to quit than other cigarettes.
A major lesson of the pandemic is that science is "not a priesthood," says Dr. Jeffrey A. Singer, a general surgeon and senior fellow at the Cato Institute.
The president’s COVID-19 adviser embodies the arrogance of technocrats who are sure they know what’s best for us.
The Biden administration's main priority seems to be leaving the agency's authority vague enough to allow future interventions.
The Colorado Democrat supports abortion rights, school choice, letting kids play unsupervised, an end to COVID-19 overreach, and an income tax rate of "zero."
Some implications of the government's decision not to seek a stay of the district court ruling. Plus, the low quality of the trial judge's opinion doesn't necessarily mean there are no good arguments against the mandate's legality.
That's a fundamentally anti-democratic attitude.
The Stanford professor and Great Barrington Declaration coauthor stands up to COVID-19 autocrats and disastrous lockdowns by following the science.
The anti-lockdown Stanford public health professor on being attacked by Fauci, the loss of trust in medical experts, and how to save science going forward.
Clarifying the agency's authority could impede future power grabs.
Plus: Conspiracy theories are undergoing a vibe shift, Florida won't stop attacking private companies, and more...
The decision against the rule hinged on whether the agency had the power it asserted.
Though travel isn't completely back to normal, this change is an overdue acknowledgment that we can't always view COVID-19 transmission as catastrophic.
The decision holds that the CDC exceeded its legal authority. But it may be vulnerable to reversal on appeal.
"Our system does not permit agencies to act unlawfully even in pursuit of desirable ends," writes Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle.
Among experts on food safety, the consensus is that the FDA's food division isn't functional.
Revived mandates remind everyone that governments have done far more harm than good in the pandemic.
Plus: Elon Musk offers to buy all of Twitter, China's "zero COVID" policy is reaching its limits, and more...
The CDC thinks a monthlong review of COVID policies will be sufficient to redress their errors.
The agency's obsession with adolescent vaping is driving decisions that undermine public health.
Kamala Harris is only human, says Jen Psaki.
"I know the CDC is working to develop a scientific framework," says Ashish K. Jha
"People's irrational fears are taking over these policy decisions," says one parent.
"In practical terms, COVID-19 poses zero threat to the G.W. community."
The lawsuit raises some of the same issues as earlier successful challenges against the CDC's eviction moratorium. But, in this case, the federal government has a stronger legal rationale for its policies.
Life is returning to "normal" after two years, but that normal includes even fewer limits on executive powers.
The eviction moratorium and Title 42 "public health" expulsion cases have many parallels that may have been ignored because of their differing ideological valence. Both strengthen the case for nondeferential judicial review of the exercise of emergency powers.
Q&A with Dr. Vinay Prasad, a practicing hematologist-oncologist and associate professor in the department of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California, San Francisco
More evidence that the public health bureaucracy dropped the ball when a once-in-a-generation pandemic hit.
The same agency that brought us security theater continues to enforce a rule that never made sense.
The agency ignores downward trends in both kinds of nicotine use and obscures the huge difference in the hazards they pose.
The policy, which covers trains, buses, and subways as well, is now set to expire on April 18.
Plus: Russian tactics in Ukraine getting uglier, DHS does bulk surveillance of money transfers, Biden's overhyped cryptocurrency order, and more...
A spending bill provision would redefine "tobacco products" to include products that have nothing to do with tobacco.
Robert Califf must demand transparency and accountability from the bureaucrats.
Disagreement over pandemic policy accelerates the slide toward authoritarianism in another country.
2.5 million dead bees, and an unlikely test of public health powers.
The surgeon general's definition of misinformation includes statements that are arguably or verifiably true.
Plus: Texas can't investigate family of transgender teen, SCOTUS considers case on doctor drug trafficking, and more...
"If I do my job right, you should barely know I'm here."