Clueless Legislators Deter Smokers From Vaping
California undermines public health by arbitrarily classifying e-cigarettes as tobacco products.
California undermines public health by arbitrarily classifying e-cigarettes as tobacco products.
Classifying vaping devices as tobacco products will deter smokers from making a switch that could save their lives.
Did you know sugar helps make you fat? Of course you did.
The FDA is suppressing potentially lifesaving information about the health advantages of e-cigarettes.
Regulators won't let manufacturers of vaping hardware and e-liquids tell their customers the truth.
The agency's new rules threaten products that offer a much safer alternative to smoking.
The agency's final rule leaves conventional cigarettes on the market while requiring much safer alternatives to meet prohibitive requirements.
"Addiction rewires your brain like falling in love does," says Maia Szalavitz, author of "Unbroken Brain."
E-cigarettes aren't just a safer alternative to the real thing, they're an innovation people plan to use whether or not scolds approve.
The venerable British medical society recognizes the harm-reducing potential of e-cigarettes.
The British medical group endorses e-cigarettes as a harm-reducing alternative to the conventional kind.
In the name of public health, Punjab treats vaped nicotine as an unapproved medicine.
Hillary Clinton joins Philadelphia's mayor in playing down the levy's paternalistic purpose.
Nanny tendencies overcome promise not to raise taxes on the less wealthy.
The reported version of an appropriations bill would change a crucial cutoff date.
Drafted by the group formerly known as Morality in Media, the measure was passed unanimously by Utah lawmakers.
The agency bizarrely counts tobacco-free, noncombustible e-cigarettes as a kind of tobacco.
Two public health researchers condemn the "information quarantine" surrounding safer nicotine products.
Celebrity doctor Margaret Cuomo falsely claims e-cigarettes are "at least as harmful" as the real thing.
Margaret Cuomo claims e-cigarettes are "at least as harmful" as the real thing.
It's based on research and sharing information, not on more regulations.
A judge stopped mandatory labels, which had been set to take full effect this week.
Data from a hospital near Denver show the rate of marijuana mentions among patients from other states doubled in 2014.
Surveys combined with hair tests indicate that MDMA adulteration is common.
Yesterday was a win for adult entertainment, sure, but also for personal liberty and against an overreaching nanny state.
Rich men average 12 years longer; rich women average 10 years more.
Can we really say taxes that reduce consumption but aren't reducing obesity are effective?
Duncan Hunter tries to show that vaping is quite different from smoking.
England's National Health Service years behind in understanding treatment needs.
New Years Resolution: Stop putting your kids and other people at risk
FDA finally ending lifetime ban.
More regulation for very little return.
What happens when warnings about processed meat's cancer risk collides with California's absurd Prop 65 (over)warning law?
Initiative essentially creates a bounty for citizens (and lawyers) to sue producers.
The same survey finds that never-smokers rarely become regular vapers.
The final in a three-part series on how Sarah Maslin Nir's investigative series violated the standards of responsible journalism.
Sitting all day will kill you. Well, maybe not.
The problem is too much FDA regulation, not too little.
The Economics Nobel Laureate worries that crony capitalism will kill off economic growth
Probably not, but The New York Times is eager to credit politicians.
The answer, like the frequency of youth gun carrying, may vary from state to state.
A far-fetched conspiracy theory says a lot about alternative medicine advocates and their tenuous relationship with reality.
E-cigarette critics lean heavily on post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning.
Let us decide for ourselves if genetic ignorance is bliss.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks