Soda Taxes

A Soda Tax As Found Money

Hillary Clinton joins Philadelphia's mayor in playing down the levy's paternalistic purpose.


When Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders argued about soda taxes last week, neither of them mentioned obesity. That striking omission reflects a shift in tactics by advocates of a special levy on sugar-sweetened drinks, who have started emphasizing the good that can be done with the resulting revenue instead of the evil that can be prevented by encouraging people to consume fewer calories.

During a visit to Philadelphia last Wednesday, Clinton said she was "very supportive" of Mayor Jim Kenney's plan to pay for public preschool with a three-cent-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened drinks. "We need universal preschool," she said, and "that's a way to do it." Sanders, Clinton's rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, criticized her for supporting a tax that hits the poor especially hard.

Sanders is right that a soda tax is highly regressive. Poor people are more likely than rich people to drink regular soda, and even if that weren't true the money they spend on soda (including any applicable taxes) would represent a bigger share of their income.

ShopRite in Philadelphia is currently selling three 12-packs of 12-ounce Coca-Cola cans for $12. Kenney's levy, if passed through to consumers, would more than double that price—obviously a bigger burden for poor and middle-class shoppers than it is for the wealthy.

Mayor Kenney, who as a city councilman led the fight against a two-cent-per-ounce soda tax proposed by his predecessor, Michael Nutter, alluded to the regressive nature of the levy he now supports in his budget address last month. "The line that really got me four years ago was the claim that this tax would hurt low-income, minority communities," he said. "But the truth is that soda companies are the ones actually targeting their advertising at low-income, minority communities."

Kenney seemed to be implying that poor people of color buy soda only because they blindly do what billboards tell them to do, meaning the city would be doing them a favor by using taxes to discourage those purchases. Yet he also suggested that the new tax would come from the "incredible profit margins" of "large soda companies and wealthy distributors" rather than the pockets of poor people. Last week he called it a "corporate tax," declaring that "it is immoral and completely hypocritical for these vested corporate interests to pass this tax on to the very people they have profited from for decades."

Kenney seems to have forgotten that the whole rationale for taxing soda is to discourage consumption of an unhealthy product by raising its price. When researchers try to figure out whether the soda taxes imposed by Mexico or Berkeley are working as intended, the first thing they look for is higher soda prices. If the taxes are not passed on to consumers, these levies cannot possibly do what they're supposed to do.

Even if prices of sugary beverages go up, and even if consumers respond by drinking less of them, that change does not necessarily lead to a reduction in total caloric intake, let alone one big enough to have a noticeable impact on obesity. By eschewing the usual paternalistic justification for soda taxes, Kenney avoids such sticky questions as well as the resentment that comes from trying to steer people's dietary choices.

Kenney's strategy is logically suspect, since his claim that his tax won't affect prices makes you wonder why he decided to tax these products in particular. Yet playing down the "public health" rationale for soda taxes seems to be working.

In 2010 The Philadelphia Inquirer opposed Nutter's "hefty tax on sugary drinks," saying it was "regressive" and "will not have the desired impact" on obesity. But the paper's editorial board likes Kenney's even heftier tax on sugary drinks because Kenney has "refrained from overselling the uncertain public-health benefits."

When The New York Times asked Kenney about the public health benefits of his soda tax last month, he dodged the question. "There's really serious health benefits in pre-K," he replied. 

© Copyright 2016 by Creators Syndicate Inc.

NEXT: Philly's Rep. Chaka Fattah First Incumbent to Lose Primary in 2016 Cycle

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I’m not crying over the soda tax because it offsets the subsidies for high fructose corn syrup. Of course, better to get rid of both.

  2. The Soda Tax is completely flawed. It is regressive, it will have a compounding negative effect. People who still want regular soda will simply drive the 10-15 minutes outside of the city to do their shopping. While they are getting soda, they are also likely to buy other items. So, not only are you losing revenue on the soda sales, you are losing the other secondary purchases that go along with it.

    Kenney is basically trying to start Municipal Indoctrination Babysitting Camps in the form of Universal Pre-K.

    1. And the people driving that additional distance will be adding to greenhouse gas emissions! Why do supporters of Soda Taxes hate the planet?

  3. I bought brand new whiite Ferrari by working ONline work. five month ago i hear from my friend that she is working some online job and making more then $85/hr i can’t beleive. But when i start this job i have to believed her Now i am also making 85$/hr if you want to try. Check Here…….JU07


  4. Maybe it would increase FDI. It sure would make us all look better.

    1. Even if that were true, who are you to force me to “look better”?

  5. Only Queen Hillary knows what’s best for you – a mere subject of Her Queen’s benevolence.

  6. Want to meet a girl? Welcome to
    the Best adult Dating site!

  7. Well this will end with a black man being choked out for selling lucy cans of soda. And then Mr. Kenney blaming the cops for enforcing his policy.

    1. Best comment so far this week. Hands down winner.

  8. I’ve made $64,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I do,


  9. “We need universal preschool,” she said, and “that’s a way to do it.”

    Assumes facts not in evidence.

    1. But she forgets that if you discourage the behavior through a surtax, there won’t be any money for the pre kindergarten program. How will she want to pay for it then?

  10. Start making more money weekly. This is a valuable part time work for everyone. The best part work from comfort of your house and get paid upto 2k each week. Start today and have your first cash at the end of this week. For more details

    Check this link

  11. No mention of the paramount evil of the government attempting to tell you what to do with your life? Shame on you.

  12. “We need universal preschool,” she said, and “that’s a way to do it.”
    Yeah institutionalizing every child at age 5 ain’t working out. A small percentage still vote for Republicans when they grow up. Gotta nip that in the bud.

  13. Get those brats into the ‘cane fields and bottling plants – problem solved.

    It might drive up the cost of my monocle washers, but that’s the type of sacrifice I’m willing to make.

  14. Subsidize sugar on the front end, tax it on the back end. Do these people own stock in artificial sweeteners?

  15. ShopRite in Philadelphia is currently selling three 12-packs of 12-ounce Coca-Cola cans for $12. Kenney’s levy, if passed through to consumers, would more than double that price…

    Check your math. Twelve twelve-ounce cans are 144oz. Three cents an ounce is: 144 x .03 = $4.32, or just over 25% of $12, not “more than double.”

    1. Erp… mea culpa … I completely missed that it is 3 twelve packs for $12… which triple my number and exonerate the author.

  16. What a post, i really like it and you like this app also for downloading free movies as well as stream latest movies and videos online:

  17. The city, in typical government fashion, will take existing soda sales, multiply it by 3 cents per ounce, then plug that figure into revenues, and increase spending by that amount. Sales of soda will plunge, of course, failing to meet the revenue goal, but having no impact on the spending. Which will result in an even larger deficit than before. The politicians will be uncertain why this happened, but will gladly come up with further tax increases. For the children, as always.

  18. I’m making $86 an hour working from home. I was shocked when my neighbour told me she was averaging $95 but I see how it works now. I feel so much freedom now that I’m my own boss. This is what I do,


  19. Funny watching the “progressives” react to crony capitalism. Bernie got this one right. Hillary and Mayor Kenney have no clue about tax policy. All they know is grab the dough.

  20. I’ve made $76,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student.I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money.It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it.

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..


  21. Philadelphia has more problems to solve than HFCS in sodas making people fat. That tax and the thinking behind that tax is just one more on our freedoms to live our lives without government interference. There are thousands of these nanny state laws gradually snipping off a little bit of freedom here and a little more there. Taking away freedoms is a very progressive liberal thing to do. Just as Obamacare’s mandates, and the somewhat recent court decisions on businesses denying service to the sexual revolution, interfere with our religious freedoms to live our faith.

  22. before I saw the bank draft which had said $9426 , I didnt believe that…my… brother woz like actualy earning money part-time at there labtop. . there uncles cousin has done this 4 less than fifteen months and by now repaid the dept on there place and got a great new Mini Cooper . read the full info here …

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??

    ? ? ? ?

  23. Most of us want to have good income but don’t know how to do thaat on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn money at home, so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the site. More than sure that you will get best result.OI3..


Please to post comments

Comments are closed.