Here Is Why the 6th Circuit Reinstated OSHA's Vaccine Mandate—and Why One Judge Disagreed
The argument hinges largely on what makes an emergency standard "necessary."
The argument hinges largely on what makes an emergency standard "necessary."
Pfizer/BioNTech reports that a third shot significantly neutralizes the emerging variant.
The appeals court is skeptical of the claim that the Texas governor's order illegally discriminates against people with disabilities.
The World Health Organization warns that such restrictions can cause more harm than they prevent.
Just how infectious and dangerous the new variant could be is not known at this time.
The government argues that the 5th Circuit erred in concluding that the rule "grossly exceeds OSHA's statutory authority."
A unanimous three-judge panel concludes that the decree "grossly exceeds OSHA's statutory authority."
A federal judge concluded that the Texas governor's ban on mask mandates illegally discriminated against students with disabilities.
Rochelle Walensky seems to be relying on a laboratory study that did not measure infection risk.
The appeals court said the rule, which was published on Friday, raises "grave statutory and constitutional issues."
Because the agency ties mask recommendations to virus transmission rather than serious cases, its guidance is unlikely to change anytime soon.
Neither politician is willing to tolerate deviation from the one business policy he thinks is best.
The failure of legal challenges obscures an ongoing scientific debate.
When you are already convinced a policy makes sense, any evidence will do.
Recent modeling scenarios cautiously suggest yes.
Young males infected with COVID-19 are six times more likely to develop myocarditis than those who have been vaccinated.
New research shows incidental and mild infections account for a large and rising share of that widely cited number.
A broad standard with no exceptions better serves his goals, but it will be harder to defend in court.
OSHA has rarely used this option, which avoids the usual rule-making process, and most challenges to such edicts have been successful.
Biden's sudden embrace of a federal vaccine requirement seems inconsistent with his acknowledgment that he cannot mandate every COVID-19 precaution he'd like people to follow.
The president seems determined to anoint the agency’s director as the nation’s COVID-19 dictator, no matter what the law says.
If all sensible people agree that students should be forced to wear masks, why do other countries reject that policy?
The Court said it "strains credulity" to believe that Congress gave the CDC the "breathtaking amount of authority" it asserted.
The secretary of education argues that federal law makes the CDC's COVID-19 guidelines for schools mandatory.
The studies cited by the CDC do not show that preventing COVID-19 outbreaks requires forcing students to cover their faces.
The government "strongly recommends" masking at private outdoor gatherings as well.
If so, public health officials have compounded the problem with disingenuous arguments, dubious policy shifts, and misleading statements.
Although Patrick notes that blacks are less likely to be vaccinated than whites, the gap between Republicans and Democrats is much larger.
Writing in The New York Times, Judith Danovitch also argues that masks inhibit nail biting and nose picking.
A rational debate requires acknowledging both the strengths and the weaknesses of the scientific evidence.
Gov. Greg Abbott's position on private vaccination requirements is confused and confusing.
Whether or not YouTube should have suspended him, the senator overlooked the limitations of the studies he cited and ignored countervailing research.
The evidence that the benefits outweigh the costs is not nearly as impressive as mandate enthusiasts imply.
The administration issued the order even while conceding that it lacked the authority to do so.
Online censorship by proxy undermines the ordinary process for checking claims and counterclaims.
Gov. Ron DeSantis' embrace of the law contradicts his avowed commitment to economic freedom.
They'll never be satisfied in a world of balanced risks.
The results also indicate that vaccinated people infected by delta have lower viral loads and less severe symptoms than unvaccinated people.
That conclusion is not justified by the CDC's Provincetown data, and it is inconsistent with a new study from Singapore.
Federal officials invited alarmist press coverage of breakthrough infections.
Thank goodness for small blessings in a public health emergency?
The administration is dismayed by the alarmist news coverage it invited.
Researchers are still trying to determine what role vaccinated carriers may have played in the Massachusetts cases identified by the CDC.
The agency says it found high viral loads in vaccinated people infected by the coronavirus, but the significance of those results is unclear.
The administration’s public pressure campaign against COVID-19 "misinformation" cannot be reconciled with its avowed respect for freedom of expression.
Speech is protected by the First Amendment even when it discourages vaccination.
Requiring inoculated people to wear masks does not seem like a sensible or effective response, and it could deter vaccination.
It could, if it actually had the vast public health powers that the Biden administration claims it does.