Tariff Gambit
Plus: Elon Musk's purportedly illegal scheme, nicotine nation, and more...
Plus: Elon Musk's purportedly illegal scheme, nicotine nation, and more...
Whether through policy or prosecution, the president's ability to punish his political enemies should be sharply constrained.
After proposing a deduction for interest paid on car loans, the former president suggested it would apply only to vehicles made in America.
A new report shows that politically connected companies were better able to navigate the exclusion process and avoid paying tariffs during the Trump administration.
The former president says the government should be funded like it was in 1890. So where's the plan to reset spending to 1890s levels?
Why I'm voting for Harris in the 2024 election.
Both candidates have promised a litany of special favors to handpicked constituencies. If you don't fit into the right categories, you'll pay the price.
Drew Johnson wants to help define the post-Trump GOP.
These policies may sound good on paper—but they would be disastrous in reality.
Katherine Tai said tariffs were "leverage" against China, but now she admits that China hasn't made "any changes to its fundamental systemic structural policies."
Similar price hikes would hit smartphones, laptops, tablets, and televisions.
Donald Trump's plan for massive tariff increases is particularly dangerous because the White House could likely implement it without any new congressional authorization.
Yes. But there might be one more key opportunity to rein in presidential powers over trade.
The candidate’s protectionism offsets some otherwise positive tax ideas.
Everyone benefited when I manufactured my invention in China, but Americans benefited more.
Trump's protectionist running mate comes out against “cheap, knockoff toasters” and common sense.
Vance says higher energy prices make building houses more costly. What, then, do tariffs on steel and lumber do?
A lot more than Oren Cass and J.D. Vance want you to think, and Americans wouldn't like the tradeoffs necessary.
If the former president wins the 2024 race, the circumstances he would inherit are far more challenging, and several of his policy ideas are destructive.
The America of the past grew in spite of tariffs, not because of them.
Neither Harris nor Trump has a plan to address national debt, but they dramatically differ on taxation.
The costs of steep tariffs and a higher corporate income tax extend far beyond the advertised targets.
One official was concerned that lifting tariffs would lead to "lots of questions from domestic dairy producers."
Plus: Brat summer revisited, Telegram CEO arrested, and more...
Both campaigns represent variations on a theme of big, fiscally irresponsible, hyper-interventionist government.
A half-baked idea that is just as dubious as Donald Trump's tariffs.
Plus: Special guest Ben Dreyfuss joins the editors this week.
A new poll challenges the protectionist narrative currently dominating both sides of the political aisle.
A new Cato Institute/YouGov survey finds contradictory attitudes on trade policy, and widespread ignorance. The survey also suggests a potentially promising political strategy for free trade advocates.
Seventy-five percent of respondents are concerned that tariffs will raise the cost of the things they buy, yet neither Trump nor Harris has suggested lowering them.
The New Right talks a big populist game, but their policies hurt the people they're supposed to help.
Tariffs lead to trade wars, limit competition, and reduce innovation. But both Trump and Biden want more of them.
Growth of regulation slowed under former President Trump, but it still increased.
Opening night of the Republican National Convention programmed a central issue with a Trumpian twist: "Make America Wealthy Again."
Yes, trade tariffs cause higher prices. Trump never understood that, and now Biden apparently has forgotten it.
"I don’t care to replace a left-wing nanny state with a right-wing nanny state," the onetime presidential hopeful said this week.
Although former President Donald Trump's deregulatory agenda would make some positive changes, it's simply not enough.
Yes, cheap imports hurt some American companies. But protectionist trade policy harms many more Americans than it helps.
And you have to admit, he's got a point.
In an interview, former National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien admitted that "the Chinese didn’t honor" the terms of the deal, years after it was clear.
In 2017, the last full year before Trump's tariffs were imposed, America's overall trade deficit was $517 billion. By 2023, it had grown to $785 billion.
Plus: Who are the editors' favorite vice presidents of all time?
Public ignorance has a big impact on voter atttudes on a major issue in the 2024 election.
Despite both presidential candidates touting protectionist trade policy, tariffs do little to address the underlying factors that make it difficult for U.S. manufacturers to compete in the global marketplace.
"The scale of trade barriers proposed by candidate Trump is unprecedented."
Bad for consumers, bad for American industry, bad for his administration's own environmental goals, and bad for an increasingly irrational executive branch.
Plus, an AI-generated recipe for garlic lovers' shrimp scampi
The economics of tariffs have not changed in the past eight years. Marco Rubio has.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10