Should the Coronavirus Lockdowns End Immediately? A Soho Forum Debate
Hoover Institution's David Henderson vs. University of Michigan's Justin Wolfers
Hoover Institution's David Henderson vs. University of Michigan's Justin Wolfers
The coronavirus shutdown might alter buying patterns, as more people flee tightly packed cities for suburban, exurban, and rural areas.
"I think a lot of people should just say, 'No. We're not going back to that.'"
Restaurants and shops are already suffering enough.
The kill switch to the economy was easy to find. The "on" button may be impossible to locate.
Plus: protecting privacy while contact tracing, first YouTube video turns 15, and more...
The Trump-era GOP lends credence to the idea that Obama-era Republicans cared about deficits only as a means of hampering a Democratic president.
The private sector has proven to be more resilient and flexible than the government.
The libertarian-leaning congressman says the Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses discriminates against those that most need it.
Health care expert Avik Roy says that even without widespread testing, it's time to reopen schools and allow healthy, younger employees to go back to work.
It's obvious that there will be more government spending in response to the coronavirus, but distinguishing the essential from the nice-to-have is more important than ever.
"The more we lock down the economy, the more we harm those individuals who are most vulnerable, who don't have the cash cushions or the white-collar jobs that allow them to keep going."
The war between Openers and Closers shouldn't be seen as a fight between idiot death-worshippers and unnecessarily frightened tyrants.
"The more government gets involved, or the more government regulation, the greater are the increases in prices over time."
And Georgia will reopen select businesses beginning April 24.
The company says it will return the money after it was announced that the Paycheck Protection Program ran out of funding.
This proposal might work, but it's doubtful that our politicians and president are competent enough to pull it off.
The White House announced a temporary suspension of tariff payments as a way to stimulate the American economy, but the relief will not apply to tariffs on steel, aluminum, or imports from China.
We may find that we like making our own decisions.
The congresswoman claimed that Amazon is "refusing to provide basic protective equipment to workers." That's not true.
Plus: sensitive cellphone data swept up in coronavirus containment efforts, and more...
"A national shutdown is not a sustainable long-term situation," Trump said Thursday evening. "We are not opening all at once, but one careful step at a time."
Plus: Puerto Rico criminalizes fake news about COVID-19, wide geographic disparity in U.S. income growth, and more...
The $349 billion loan program is meant to help small companies hit hard by social distancing.
In a new collection, the economic historian documents how classical liberals pushed for abolition and equality in 19th-century America.
It's not the politicians who have the power to reopen America, or at least the parts that are now closed. It's individuals, families, businesses, and religious congregations.
And more coronavirus stimulus spending could send that number soaring higher.
Don't let states and cities get away with onerous rules that in no way help to contain COVID-19.
A New York Times Magazine forum highlights the moral implications of suppressing economic activity.
General Motors is being charged import taxes on parts it needs to build ventilators. Its requests for relief have gone unanswered.
Export restrictions only make sense if you're unable to understand the obvious consequences of that policy.
From March 26 to April 8, the number of projected deaths from coronavirus dropped from 81,000 to 60,000. What should we do with such information?
In two separate op-eds yesterday, the senators pitch central planning as the best response to the coronavirus pandemic.
Unclear terms, unrealistic loan forgiveness, a site unprepared for launch, and a bottomless demand for cash
The president's daily press briefings are disturbing because of what they reveal, not what they obscure.
The COVID-19 crisis has resuscitated some seriously bad ideas.
The CARES Act gives the federal government the power to take large ownership stakes in the airlines and dictate much of their operations.
Pandemic patients get better care when medical professionals are free to work where they're needed. The same will undoubtedly be true of regular patients after COVID-19 has left our lives.
Event production is one of the less visible victims of the virus. Recreating their services when such companies die won't be easy.
“Can an independent federal agency that is supposed to regulate commodity futures assert power over every single purchase or sale of a commodity?”
The failure to conduct early and wide testing left politicians ignorant of basic facts about the COVID-19 epidemic.
President Donald Trump, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi all agree that a fourth spending bill will happen in April but are haggling over the cost.
The last time we sent this much money to the Kennedy Center, it was for a pair of Hamilton tickets.
A global pandemic has done what 30 years of internet manifestoes never accomplished: a mass migration into our screens.
A misleading statistic has made the rounds. But it’s based on a misreading of a government report that says no such thing.
When Americans feel like the future will be worse than the past, reactionary and socialist ideologies ascend.
Pending minimum service rules would require airlines to keep operating a certain number of flights, regardless of how little demand there is for air travel.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.