Forcing Companies to Let Employees Wear Head Scarves Is Not 'Government Non-Interference'
Nor is it required by the First Amendment.
Nor is it required by the First Amendment.
"It will have the same rules that many churches observe" except adultery is OK.
"It will have the same rules that many churches observe" except adultery is OK.
Some crisis pregnancy centers are shady. But the point should be making them be honest about what they are, not trying to turn them into something they're not.
Archbishop Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo has got something he wants to say to you...
Bigotry kneecaps the case against radical Islamism
Just as I predicted seven years ago
"No one has the right to a world in which he is never despised."
Outrage privilege: Too many universities would rather censor speech than offend fanatics
Spoiler: Hate speech actually is protected.
We shouldn't discount the charity of Muslims based on the heinous acts of a minute minority.
It's a fairly pure example of compelled speech.
Do not deliver us, oh Lord, from temptation...
Fear of Muslims is irrational. So is fear of offending Muslims.
Securing First Amendment rights is in the public interest, writes judge.
Letters to the Swindlers of Islamophobia who play into the Hands of Racists is one of the better titles
When you debate with words instead of government force, acceptance of gay marriage will win
Her fear-mongering won't produce the reformation she wants
Leftists apparently think government not funding something is akin to banning it.
RFRAs help safeguard the religious from oppressive government demands.
The perpetrator was a liberal activist and decorated campus Muslim leader who said American Sniper promoted violence.
Indiana was effectively making discrimination based on sexual orientation lawful.
The threat of a corporate boycott has sacrificed religious liberties without protecting gays
An error-filled op-ed from a liberal Times pundit.
Enjoy that slice of victory cake. It tastes like...What the hell is that?
The 2016 hopeful is vacillating in his support for Indiana's RFRA.
Memories Pizza, while not as gay-affirming as many of us would like, didn't announce pending discrimination.
The changes demanded by the governor do not rule out a defense in discrimination cases.
The anti-pizzeria mob loses its mind
Indiana is free to look the other way in the face of discrimination based on sexual orientation. But they are not free to encourage it or to make it lawful.
Vendors who object to same-sex marriage could be forced to participate in gay weddings.
Inviting the state to tread on anti-gay bakers is a pernicious distraction that betrays the principles of a free society.
He is abusing business boycotts
Why shouldn't RFRAs apply to private lawsuits?
Both conservatives and liberals aren't being straight about the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Disputes about birth control and gay marriage undermine bipartisan support for religious freedom.
Indiana's governor calls for a RFRA amendment clarifying that the law does not authorize anti-gay discrimination.
When it comes to religious freedom, boycotts, and the culture wars, there is clearly a lot of hypocrisy to go around.
Understanding the limits of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act