Youth Climate Plaintiffs Challenge Endangerment Repeal on Religious Liberty Grounds
Constitutional climate litigation seems to know no bounds.
Constitutional climate litigation seems to know no bounds.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Jill Parrish emphasizes that religious freedom must protect "unpopular or unfamiliar religious groups" as well as "popular or familiar ones."
From the sounds of it, the Air Force's attorneys didn't think too carefully about how to respond to Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) claims.
H.B. 2802 would expand discrimination protections but would carve out religious institutions.
Donating to the needy, in addition to being a generally nice thing to do, is a protected First Amendment activity.
The ruling allows Religious Freedom Restoration Act claimants - in this case Muslims subjected to discriminatory treatment by the FBI - to sue for money damages against government officials.
The Administration claims money damages are never "appropriate" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act - even when they are the only possible means of redressing rights violations.
The Supreme Court will decide whether three Muslims who refused to be informants can sue for damages under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
But is it actually even needed?
An Indiana judge just issued a blow to the state's First Church of Cannabis.
Mostly, memo reiterates what religious freedom protections mean.
Judge smacks down EEOC attempt to apply federal civil rights law against funeral home.
A better argument is required than a fear of a slippery slope.
It's a fairly pure example of compelled speech.
RFRAs help safeguard the religious from oppressive government demands.
The threat of a corporate boycott has sacrificed religious liberties without protecting gays
The latest incredibly important news on cakes and flowers.
Enjoy that slice of victory cake. It tastes like...What the hell is that?
The 2016 hopeful is vacillating in his support for Indiana's RFRA.
Memories Pizza, while not as gay-affirming as many of us would like, didn't announce pending discrimination.
He is abusing business boycotts
Understanding the limits of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks