Warrantless Border Searches Draw Call for Supreme Court Action
The feds say they can paw through your phone and laptop any time you enter or leave the country.
The feds say they can paw through your phone and laptop any time you enter or leave the country.
More than half of Americans don’t have these new licenses. Airports are supposed to start checking them by October.
A 2018 Supreme Court decision was supposed to protect your location data from federal snooping. That’s not what happened.
The surveillance state is available as a plug-and-play solution for any cop interested in a free trial period.
"Defendant has established that the images are a matter of public concern, as they speak to Plaintiff's character and qualifications for her position as a Congresswoman, allegedly depicting an extramarital sexual relationship with a paid campaign staff member, the use of illegal drugs by a sitting Congresswoman, and a tattoo similar to the symbols formerly used by white supremacists."
So holds the Florida Court of Appeal, interpreting the Florida Constitution's crime victims' rights provision. ("If a prosecutor determines that the officer was not a victim and instead charges the officer for his conduct," the names would be released, but no such determination was made here.)
Gripes about publishers getting "private commercial benefit" from "hate speech, propaganda, and statements that seek to destabilize American democracy"; argument that "[t]he public figure doctrine emerged in an era prior to the Internet advertising model that rewards news organizations for the ongoing display of defamatory content."
Remember: Lawyers’ true superpower is the power to turn all questions into questions about procedure.
A privacy controversy in a lawsuit by privacy advocate Marc Rotenberg (formerly of EPIC, the Electronic Privacy Information Center).
No, says the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, though over a dissent.
Sounds right to me.
Obvious, but good to have a cite for that.
Databases of involuntarily supplied identities make for a plug-and-play surveillance state.
Overbroad Injunctions Against Speech
Some speculation from my forthcoming article.
“[T]hat the subpoenas directed at Mrs. McCloughan may be less of a bona fide effort to obtain evidence supportive of the claims brought in the Indian Action, than they are an effort to burden and harass individuals formerly associated with the Washington Football Team who may have acted as sources for The Washington Post story.”
A broad coalition of groups is asking the Supreme Court to overturn the state's policy.
A phone in your pocket may as well be a GPS beacon strapped to your ankle.
Two women still face felony charges, though the cases against all male defendants were dropped.
Platform censorship results from centralized design. Cryptocurrency techies are building decentralized alternatives.
Government agencies have repeatedly proven themselves to be abusive.
Online companies might not be as nefarious as you think.
Plus: Biden won't pursue Trump's TikTok and WeChat bans, Mitt Romney's child allowance plan, and more...
Each episode explores how to fix laws that entrench privacy-violating practices.
Plus: Oregon decriminalizes hard drugs, Kroger closes stores over hazard pay rule, and more...
Meanwhile, he’s still trying to downplay corruption within his own force.
Authorities "shall destroy the videos unlawfully obtained through the surveillance of the Orchids of Asia Day Spa," a federal judge says.
Frightening events create openings for attacks on civil liberties.
Justice Clint Bolick dissents in Arizona v. Mixton.
Bureaucracy keeps on regulating through the chaos
Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force. We could use a little less of that, please.
The idea is looking less like a Get Out of Jail Free card and more like a hall pass.
Government surveillance doesn't just violate privacy rights; it’s a major security risk.
Don't just file the document unsealed, and then ask for sealing
Time to add a hat and sunglasses!
By lowering the “travel rule” threshold to $250, the government could access more of our financial data.
Constitutional amendment overwhelmingly passes.
The National Security Agency arranged for security systems to be secretly compromised. Then the Chinese government allegedly found its way in.
Privacy is a right, not a “high risk” and “possibly criminal” activity
In 2014, more than half of all California wiretaps (and one sixth of all the wiretaps in the U.S.) were authorized by one judge in Riverside County.
An attempt to protect litigant privacy meant that binding precedent was vanished from Westlaw.
Part two of a four-part series on the history of the cypherpunk movement
An Ohio judge suggests the answer should be "yes," and an Ohio statute seems to require that when Facebook employees learn of specific felonies revealed by posts that they might be monitoring for some reason.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10