CBDCs Banned
Plus: Crime prevention, JFK assassination files, and more...
A new crop of restrictive laws faces a friendly reception in the courts but ongoing public resistance.
The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board should be Trump's ally in a battle against the deep state. So why is he undermining it?
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a Texas case that could have major ramifications across the country—including, perhaps, the end of anonymity online.
Some IRS offices routinely threw away sensitive material with regular trash, while others used unlocked or damaged storage bins.
Proponents call it modernization, but watchdogs see a path to censorship.
Lee says this is about "sexual and violent content." It goes far beyond that.
Administrators say AI surveillance tech helps struggling students get care. But false alarms are common.
The Ninth Circuit upholds defendant’s conviction.
David McKnight and Julian Alcala were accused of separate plots to steal sexually explicit photos from women's phones during traffic stops.
The heart of our argument for a preliminary injunction in First Amendment Coalition, LaRoe & Volokh v. Chiu.
We're challenging a California statute that bans publishing "information relating to a sealed arrest."
A new "inactivity reboot" protects data from thieves and helps preserve due process.
Supposedly targeted at immigrants and travelers, the program endangers everybody’s liberty.
The court concludes that X's requested discovery is broader than necessary, though it leaves open the door to some considerably narrower discovery.
Two Harvard undergrads give us a glimpse of the surveillance future.
Without a warrant and specific proof of incriminating evidence, police should never be allowed past your phone’s lock screen.
A great free resource for lawyers, judges, academics, and students doing cross-state constitutional law research.
Most states collect DNA from felony arrestees pretrial. They should need a warrant to do so.
We can't stop technological advancement, but we should limit government misuse of it.
Now more than ever, people’s freedom lies in their ability to communicate and access information with privacy and security.
The government needs a warrant to spy on you. So agencies are paying tech companies to do it instead.
Personal data retained by government or private entities are always at risk of compromise, misuse, or access by law enforcement.
Twitter's founder says Nostr is “100 percent what we wanted”—an open, ownerless network.
A lawyer who should know better wants to ignore the history of snooping cops to fight guns and crime.
An uneven playing field allows the aggressive tactics and legal loopholes that turn traffic stops into cash grabs.
Routine searches of commercial buses violate privacy, target low-income passengers, and result in widespread violations.
No arrest necessary as South Carolina police hunt for cash
A 21-month legal battle unveils the dark side of South Carolina's annual traffic crackdown.
Customs and Border Protection insists that it can search electronics without a warrant. A federal judge just said it can't.
The Kids Online Safety Act would have cataclysmic effects on free speech and privacy online.
Collecting and analyzing newborns' blood could allow the state to surveil people for life.
In a "novel" order concerning the app NGL, the agency takes aim at online anonymity and at minors on social media.
While the decision is great news for Tennesseans, it's only the first step in reclaiming Americans' property rights against the open fields doctrine.
And the Supreme Court agrees to weigh in.
Americans shouldn’t count on the department to use the technology responsibly or in a limited way.
A year after a court told Maryland police that Cellebrite searches were too broad, Baltimore quietly resumed using the software.
The candidate makes the case against the two-party system.
Should pseudonymous litigants, and any precedents set in their cases, be known by the initials of the law firms that represent them?
X's child porn detection system doesn’t violate an Illinois biometric privacy law, the judge ruled.
The plaintiffs are challenging the state's widespread surveillance, which it collects through over 600 cameras.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks