Australians Should Defy Their Government's Poorly Considered Surveillance State
Australians who want to protect their data from surveillance now need to turn to extra-legal means.
Australians who want to protect their data from surveillance now need to turn to extra-legal means.
"If Kavanaugh was going to deal a major blow to health care rights during his first session on the court, this would have been the case to do it."
Also: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez owns the cons while spouting policy B.S.
Plus: Trump changes his mind about military spending and why Rand Paul hates Trump's new attorney general pick.
We've got a grant -- we've finished the first video (under 4 minutes) -- but we need a good title for the whole series.
Politicians seem unable to learn from a history of grabby tax policies fueling populist anger.
A 3rd Circuit judge says the decision approving New Jersey's 10-round limit treats the right to arms less seriously than other constitutional rights.
Parliament passes a bill at the last possible moment to give officials the power to weaken encryption.
New rules ban erotic art, talk of shared sexual interests, kink groups, and anything that "encourages sexual encounters between adults."
It's been dubbed "NYC's Anti-Airdrop Dick Pic Law," but the bill is much broader than that.
The statute is "unconstitutionally overbroad," the appeals court says, because it criminalizes "a substantial amount of protected expression."
The ruling concerns flooding of property undertaken by the San Jacinto River Authority in order to mitigate the effects of Hurricane Harvey. Issues raised in the case are similar to those at stake in ongoing federal court litigation.
As the prison-industrial complex starts to crumble, get ready for the social-media-surveillance complex to replace it.
Tech companies are compiling incredibly detailed dossiers about you.
#MeToo has come for the popular astrophysicist. Let's withhold judgement.
Meanwhile, the officers involved can't get their stories straight.
Research shows a fifth of its users seek out sexual images. But the sharing site is now part of a massive media conglomerate.
Plus: the First Amendment problems with prosecuting Wikileaks and the trans troops ban is dealt another blow.
A creative legal theory, roundly rejected.
"It's gonna be a lot of fun beating the hell out of these shitheads once the sun goes down and nobody can tell us apart."
Sophisticated firearms are becoming ever-easier to illicitly manufacture in basic workshops, says a new report. We'll even show you how to do it!
Even the Obama administration recognized it didn't have the authority to ban bump stocks.
Police chief calls it a "spur-of-the-moment idea that seemed to have some merit to it."
Killing Section 230 would only lead web platforms to ban even more speech.
"I had to add a content warning or else."
It is unconstitutional for the government to discriminate against organizations based on their viewpoint.
Emantic Bradford Jr. may have had a gun. But he didn't deserve to die.
As Facebook's supposed ideological allies unfriend the social media giant, the tech industry is learning that there are no permanent allegiances in politics.
A federal judge overturns a state ban on telling customers they can bring their own beer or wine.
The snitch crusade is ostensibly about making sure hot women aren't making money off their hotness without giving the government a cut.
One of America's top social scientists on what has changed since he sat down with Reason 38 years ago.
Kelly says the social media site offered no explanation, which would violate its own policies.
Nadine Strossen, Eugene Volokh, and Stephanie Slade discuss freedom of speech, assembly, and religion at Reason's 50th anniversary.
Plus: U.S. support for gay speakers rose as support for racist speakers diminished.
So holds a federal court, concluding that such e-mails with photos of gun crime victims, coupled with statements such as "Thought you should see a few photos of handiwork of the assault rifles you support," were protected by the First Amendment.
Clicking the "wrong" link can get you interrogated by the authorities-and the situation may soon get worse.
Censoring politicians' racist, sexist, and abhorrent behavior on social media does a big favor to racist, sexist, and abhorrent politicians.
Yet under Chinese law, some rapists get only three years behind bars.
The Supreme Court has ordered reargument in a crucial property rights case. The outcome could hinge on an extremely dubious theory put forward in an amicus brief by the federal government.
The Arizona Supreme Court got it right: categorical denials of bail to persons charged with sexual assault violates the Constitution.
The statute in that case was a funding condition on federal money given to universities -- but the Court's decision held that the government could impose the same rule categorically, whether or not the universities got funds.
I'd love to have people's comments this week, since I owe the journal a final draft Saturday the 24th. [UPDATE: Just to be clear, the article aims to provide a coherent framework for understanding the current precedents, not to come up with new rules from scratch.]
Cases in which a majority of the Court fell down on the job.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.