Australia Chosen as the Battleground to Try to Destroy Your Data Privacy
Draft legislation would force tech companies to compromise encryption at the government's demand.
Draft legislation would force tech companies to compromise encryption at the government's demand.
Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff explain how "good intentions and bad ideas" have made young people super-fragile-and how to make things better.
My Spanish blasphemy post reminded that I've been meaning to blog about the Indonesian decision, handed down last month.
"The Spanish Association of Christian Lawyers has announced that it is also planning to ask the judge to consider investigating Toledo for hate crimes after he said during a television interview that if people were shot for their religious beliefs and Catholic churches burned during the Spanish Civil War, it was because they 'must have done something."'
Before demanding censure or intervention, take a step back from the Twitter machine and ask yourself whether anyone really cares about this stuff.
Criminologist Gary Kleck revises his paper on the incidence of the use of firearms for self-protection.
Thanks to a design bug in a government transparency website, dozens of social security numbers were mistakenly made public.
The urge to suppress runs up against targets which have no form, shape, or fixed location, and can be infinitely reproduced.
A good example of a court properly protecting the public right of access to court records.
In a concurring opinion, Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett expresses concern about the " kudzu-like creep of the modern immunity regime."
Oregon is one of a handful states that bans age discrimination against 18-to-20-year-olds by places of public accommodation.
Authorities say Krissy Noble was justified in shooting and killing a home intruder while she was pregnant.
"While not a criminal matter, an order of protection exposes a respondent to an array of restrictions, including severe limitations on his or her Second Amendment rights. A respondent deserves a meaningful due process opportunity to present his or her case."
The rule would have banned, among other things, "harmful verbal ... conduct that manifests bias or prejudice towards others" "on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, age, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status or socioeconomic status in conduct related to the practice of law," including "in bar association, business or social activities in connection with the practice of law."
Why should an athlete be subjected to a nonsensical controversy ginned up by reporters?
None of the usual solutions seems apt.
Criminologist Gary Kleck and former head of the Brady Center To Prevent Gun Violence Paul Helmke will debate defensive gun use.
Tracy Zona was ordered to "remove forthwith, all references to petitioner the family and legal representatives and make no further posting in re of any kind"; she was then ordered to spend five days in jail unless she removed the posts (which she did).
Referencing Shakespeare, the Bible, and American colonial times, a federal court rules in favor of a group's right to feed the homeless.
A state law says you can't call it meat unless it's actually beef, pork, or poultry. Critics say the bill violates the First Amendment.
Threatened regulations on "fake news" would be an attack on press freedom
Cody Wilson's attorney talks guns, speech, and "Lochner-izing the First Amendment."
But would the First Amendment allow Congress to regulate search results?
That's how I read his item last week in TechCrunch, which warns Internet companies that this might happen if they "fail to understand one simple principle: that an individual endorsing (or denying) the extermination of millions of people, or attacking the victims of horrific crimes or the parents of murdered children, is far more indecent than an individual posting pornography."
Plus: "Sheriff Joe" Arpaio faces voters again, states go after sexual-assault NDAs, and Louisiana florists fight licensing exams.
Should we be concerned about a new system to keep track of real vs. fake news?
Prof. James Livingston (white himself) said he "hate[s] white people" -- but Rutgers' reasoning would equally punish professors who express a wide range of views that offend people with a particular religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, and the like.
The same civil liberties that protect accused communists or street criminals may also protect the president or his lawyer. They protect us all.
Don't assume Roe v. Wade will be safe with Justice Kavanaugh.
The NRA accuses N.Y. government officials of unconstitutionally pressuring financial services companies into not dealing with the NRA -- an ACLU friend-of-the-court brief says, "If true, those allegations represent a blatant violation of the First Amendment."
The civil rights group and the gun rights group don't always get along. But today the ACLU stuck up for the NRA against New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Prosecutors have declined to file charges against the officer.
Israa al-Ghomgham would be the first female activist to be executed in Saudi Arabia.
The insults were in e-mails sent to the Turkish embassy.
Far from undermining freedom of the press, the president's fulminations prove its durability.
The court stressed that the song threated particular police officers by name.
"For some of us it's as if we are already dead, so what do we have to lose?"
"I didn't feel comfortable being told what I couldn't write about by President Falwell."
An Oklahoma case involving an employee's allegations of food plant contamination-litigated under seal.
Masked Antifa agitators told Welch, a Hillary voter, to hand over the flag. He resisted. They attacked.
An inside look at how indie media veterans James Larkin and Michael Lacey became the targets of a federal witchhunt.
Words of wisdom from Rhode Island Judge Richard Licht.
More details emerge on TSA's secret, suspicionless surveillance of certain American travelers.
A story of censorship in the age of memes
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks