Workplace Discrimination Against Gays Is Covered Under the Civil Rights Act, Says a Second Federal Court
A third court disagrees. The Supreme Court had the chance to take on the case to resolve the conflict, but it declined.
A third court disagrees. The Supreme Court had the chance to take on the case to resolve the conflict, but it declined.
The justices have passed up one opportunity after another to clarify the boundaries of the constitutional right to arms.
But such a content-based tax would violate the First Amendment.
After missing warning signs, law enforcement and others are now quick to say they need more power to stop the next tragedy.
It's more about sending a message to Congress
"It seems to me your argument doesn't have much weight."
John Stossel picks the best and worst political performances of the year.
Forget the debates over laws that can't make a difference; the heat and noise is really all about political tribes attempting to inconvenience each other.
On today's podcast: Mona Charen gets booed, the gun control debate reignites, public sector unions suck, and Olympic curling is surprisingly awesome.
It is doubtful that the proposed rule would have made a difference in mass shootings.
Rick Scott isn't blazing new ground here.
"I gave him a gun. I gave him a badge. I gave him the training. If he didn't have the heart to go in, that's not my responsibility."
Argues that secret wiretap authorizations were not abused.
In the aftermath of the Parkland shooting.
A self-proclaimed "constitutional bounty hunter" is unlikely to be freed, but his case sets a significant precedent for criminal appeals.
No adults seem embarrassed by this reaction. They should be.
The National Constitution Center invited Alicia Hickok and me to debate Janus; Ms. Hickok wrote an amicus brief supporting Janus, and I signed an amicus brief supporting the AFSCME.
Unless crafted carefully, the proposal could set up more standoffs between armed citizens and police.
After an initial hearing, Stanford's Mark Jacobson thinks better of pursuing a scientific disagreement in court.
"Where were these people getting their ideas, I wondered, about gender identity development, about the supposed gender binaries of the world, and about me?"
A screening system can be "comprehensive" without being smart, fair, or effective.
He'd also like everyone to trim their hair so it doesn't touch their ears.
"Time is truly of the essence here," said a lawyer for women imprisoned at Santa Rita Jail.
Yes, kooky rumors can spread quickly online. In this case, the angry reactions to those rumors may be spreading even faster.
The gun-control consensus that is forming should be particularly troubling to "mentally ill" Americans and skeptics of unrestrained police power.
The president showed empathy, engagement, and leadership in a way that will surprise many of his critics and supporters alike.
Are "gun violence restraining orders" the answer?
The benefits and flaws of policy disputes get sidelined when activist movements adopt kids as human shields.
The president may want to act, but he may need Congress to go along.
The "information warfare" described in Friday's indictment is not an existential threat to American democracy.
The once obscure device may not be long for this world.
Since the mid-1990s (and despite mass shootings), popular opinion in favor of gun rights has increased. It's unlikely the Parkland massacre will change that.
Katherine Mangu-Ward, Peter Suderman, Robby Soave and Nick Gillespie talk gun violence, immigration politics, Russian electoral interference, and Black Panther.
The government always compels taxpayers to fund the management side of management-labor bargaining in public workplaces. Given this, why should there be a First Amendment problem with compelled funding (through agency fees as well as taxes) of both sides?
"The right to keep and bear arms is apparently this Court's constitutional orphan."
Saginaw demands that establishments install video cameras and turn over footage.
ICE and border patrol agents want access to NSA intel obtained without warrants.
Such orders can easily be used to take away innocent people's Second Amendment rights.
Looking back a few years after hypothetical new restrictions on semiautomatic weapons in private hands, we see a country grown more divided, but no less armed.
Young Americans don't fit into dying 20th-century culture-war tribes.
The Fox News host offers good-faith ideas worth engaging.
In a wide-ranging interview, the "Notorious RBG" suggests colleges campuses are not providing adequate process to the accused.
There are no plausible options that offer more than the faintest prospect of preventing the next massacre.
Even a narrower approach, focused on purported risk, deprives many innocent people of their constitutional rights.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10