Yes, the First Amendment Protects "I Eat Ass" Bumper Stickers
That's notwithstanding the view of Lake City (Florida) police, who arrested and charged Shane Dillon for display this sticker.
That's notwithstanding the view of Lake City (Florida) police, who arrested and charged Shane Dillon for display this sticker.
In contrast, police killed nearly 1,000 people last year.
Cory Booker’s plan would unjustly deprive peaceful Americans of the fundamental right to armed self-defense.
“I don't know who to believe. Why don't I just go there and see for myself?"
Other state and cities should consider doing the same thing
Some students at the University of the Arts want the firebrand feminist fired. Where did they get the idea they should be picking faculty?
The Democratic presidential candidate promises to fight for a design requirement that is not currently feasible.
Resist when politicians declare that speech (even radical speech) is a “threat to our democracy.”
As the cryptocurrency continues use, issues of privacy and fungibility crop up.
Private property rights, public squares, "dangerous" speech, and pre-regulatory suck-ups, all debated on the Reason Podcast.
And that's just one of the measures outlined in his new gun control proposal.
A district court decision from several years ago, which I just ran across.
Even more worrying: New Zealand's leading media outlets are self-censoring coverage of the Christchurch mass shooting.
Plus: the biggest trouble with Devin Nunes' Twitter lawsuit, the Senate fails to override Trump's Yemen veto, bad news for the gig economy, and more...
Section 215 has been used to secretly access our private data, but hasn't accomplished much.
These schools are seriously committed to civil and diverse debate.
So a federal district court held Monday, and concluded that this principle was well-established enough to defeat a qualified immunity defense.
“What is freedom? It is the right to choose one’s own employment. Certainly it means that, if it means anything,” thundered Frederick Douglass.
New Defense Distributed chief Paloma Heindorff on making guns, fighting lawsuits, and life after Cody Wilson
So the Wisconsin Supreme Court held yesterday, reversing a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision.
More violence hit Venezuela today following opposition leader Juan Guaidó's calls for the military to abandon the Maduro government.
Can a court block multiple statements that seem to come from several people, but that were actually all posted by one person?
The group takes its First Amendment crusade to a public park in Minnesota.
The process for obtaining "extreme risk protection orders" that take away people's Second Amendment rights is rigged against gun owners from the outset.
Today it's creators, not cops, who want to banish R. Crumb, onetime king of the comics underground.
Director Penny Lane chronicles the rise of the Satanic Temple, a group that combines theatrical stunts with political activism.
An interesting decision from the Fifth Circuit, allowing a negligence claim to go forward against organizer Deray Mckesson; the court's reasoning relies heavily on the illegal nature of the protest.
Plus: "we need a president who recognizes sex work as work," says Mike Gravel; how kid-friendly pot paraphernalia killed decriminalization; more...
"Students were just screaming that we were trying to 'kill them.'"
After years of political fights over our privacy, a potential end in mass phone metadata collection
Just filed yesterday, and I think it should prevail.
So holds a District Court decision, though stressing the "may be."
Iconic British foods like Christmas pudding and strawberries and cream get censored.
But most gun crimes are carried out with out-of-state firearms.
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on other grounds?
The California senator claims she could impose "near-universal background checks" and close the "boyfriend loophole" without new legislation.
Should you be worried?
They're joined by an arrested spa owner and manager in fighting the release of surveillance video, with an array of big media companies on the other side.
Legal scholar Jeff Kosseff wanted to write a "biography" of Section 230, the law that immunizes websites and ISPs from a lot of legal actions. He fears he has written its obituary.
Seems like a pretty clear First Amendment violation, even if the name is viewed as an offensive reference to illegal aliens (which the corporate owners apparently don't intend).
Classifying heavy internet use as medical addiction leads to bad policy and inferior patient care.
Even if injunctions against libel don't violate the First Amendment, should state courts still reject them on state separation of powers principles?
A relatively novel suggestion, aimed at providing libel defendants with the necessary First Amendment protections while still giving libel plaintiffs protection early in the litigation process.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks