My Washington Times Article Making the Case for Increasing Compensation and Procedural Protections for Property Owners Who Lose their Land to Eminent Domain
It's the second in a two-part series on eminent domain reform.
It's the second in a two-part series on eminent domain reform.
This includes "burning a national flag or religious texts, caricatures of religious figures, or criticism of ideologies."
Nashville’s Leah Gilliam says her vanity plate is protected by the First Amendment.
"We thought they helped people."
I'm serializing my new Social Media Platforms as Common Carriers? article, forthcoming in the Journal of Free Speech Law.
I finally have a presentable draft of this article, forthcoming in the Journal of Free Speech Law; I'll be posting excerpts over the next couple of weeks.
A response to Jonathan Adler's attempt at an originalist defense of Kelo v. City of New London.
The general assumption that the Fifth Amendment bars takings for economic development purposes rests on shaky ground.
We can thank judges who were prepared to enforce constitutional limits on public health powers.
Glenn Reynolds suggests it's how that landmark decision was applied and expanded that has created the real problem.
The Court has "failed to justify our enacted policy," he wrote.
He repeats his concern that QI doctrine rests on "shaky ground" and imposes a "one-size-fits-all doctrine" that is "an odd fit for many cases," including those involving university administrators.
Salaythis Melvin's family says they want justice.
Six justices agreed that the state's "dragnet for sensitive donor information" imposes "a widespread burden on donors' associational rights."
We'll be ready to publish articles on this subject as early as September, if you submit them by August 1.
"The gravity of the privacy concerns in this [case] is further underscored by the [amicus briefs supporting the challenge].... [T]hese organizations span the ideological spectrum ...: from the [ACLU] to the Proposition 8 Legal Defense Fund; from the Council on American-Islamic Relations to the Zionist Organization of America; from Feeding America—Eastern Wisconsin to PBS Reno."
Plus: How Trump lost in 2020, Amazon seeks recusal of FTC chair, and more...
The fees would be used to reimburse the city for the public costs of gun violence.
Civil liberties advocates call for a moratorium on federal facial recognition.
It's likely that soon, almost all Americans will be legally able to carry guns.
So holds a Fifth Circuit panel (by a 2-to-1 vote), in an assignment requiring the writing of the Pledge of Allegiance, but the same argument would apply, I think, to compelled statements of other ideologies, whether related to patriotism, race, sex, sexual orientation, or anything else.
The officers might receive qualified immunity, however.
The plaintiff is Francesca Viola, who wrote the comment when she was a journalism professor at Temple University.
"Bartolotti alleges that 'anytime you search [his] name on [the internet, he is] affiliated with this case,' which 'has affected [his] personal and professional lives [and] has become a safety issue at times as well.'"
The Court clarified that the challenged policy need only be a "de facto final" decision, and that property owners are not required to exhaust all possible state bureaucratic procedures before filing a federal takings case. The Court also emphasized that Takings Clause property rights have "full-fledged constitutional status."
"In what legal universe is it not even plausibly unreasonable to knowingly immolate someone?" asks dissenting judge
The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?
The suspension is based on "demonstrably false and misleading statements" that Giuliani made as Donald Trump's lawyer.
This is the case against DeRay Mckesson, brought by a police officer who was injured in a protest that Mckesson allegedly organized.
Baltimore kept tabs on citizens' movement across 90 percent of the city, without a warrant, to investigate crimes.
What seems like a gun rights case actually presents some important questions of administrative law.
Law enforcers have plenty of tools; they just want to paw through our data without effort or expense.
Cracking down on "rogue gun dealers" and enforcing background checks won't stop criminals from arming themselves.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.