Lindsey Graham Says Trump Will Sign Spending Bill if It Takes Aim at Section 230
Plus: One in seven NYC chain stores closed, Columbus officers turned off body cams before fatal shooting, and more....
Plus: One in seven NYC chain stores closed, Columbus officers turned off body cams before fatal shooting, and more....
"I hope my case can start removing senseless boundaries to teletherapy," said Brokamp, who is suing in federal court on First Amendment grounds.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court 5-2 majority concludes that the injunction is "content-neutral," quite erroneously, I think.
Government surveillance doesn't just violate privacy rights; it’s a major security risk.
Police response “likely escalated tensions and the potential for violence” say investigators.
Mory Keita was involved in two cases against the government, including an ACLU suit challenging ICE and a case alleging abuse by Butler County Jail guards.
Don't just file the document unsealed, and then ask for sealing
Former Executive Director Ira Glasser discusses the past, present, and increasingly shaky future of free speech.
Xinjiang Jin (also known as Julien Jin) is being charged with conspiring to ... cause "substantial emotional distress" to people, under the "cyberstalking" statute.
A judge rightly speaks out against them.
As with all fair use claims, the analysis turns on the particular facts.
"unsubstantiated allegations" that are "irrelevant ... and therefore inadmissible" can be redacted from the public version of the filings.
That's a high price to pay because some politicians are angry about a little Facebook moderation.
Parsing issues at the intersection of current affairs and the world's largest religious denomination is no easy task.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) gets results.
Now do qualified immunity.
But such a ban would be unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination, whether applied to the Confederate flag, white supremacist symbols, or whatever else might be labeled as "hate[ful]."
Individually and in organized groups, people are pushing back against lockdown orders.
So the First Circuit concludes, quite rightly, I think.
"While I fully support the spirit of this legislation, certain technical changes are necessary."
"The statement at issue here is plainly an opinion, albeit an unflattering one."
So the Ninth Circuit just held this morning.
Though journalists tend to despise the WikiLeaks founder, his fate could impact the future of their profession.
His Trump toadying was absolutely awful, but still not nearly as bad as his unremittingly harsh approach to justice and policing.
The same logic could apply when churches, synagogues, mosques, bookstores, gun stores, fur stores, and similar places are targeted by their enemies. We've filed an amicus brief before the Georgia Court of Appeals, in support of getting the verdict reversed.
"Both religion and theatre implicate the exercise of First Amendment rights, and the prioritization of religious events over secular artistic events that enjoy First Amendment free speech protection raises potentially thorny questions."
"This Court cannot be a party ... to such a deception." So holds a federal Magistrate Judge in rejecting the parties' joint motion to seal the complaint in the case, after it had been settled.
Authoritarian-minded officials have found opportunity in public health fears.
Plus: Vaccine distribution begins, stimulus talks continue, and more...
"We certainly would not fault a trial judge's desire to ensure public safety. But judicial concern, understandable as it may be, does not confer judicial power."
So held a federal judge, I think correctly, interpreting those particular statutes, in a lawsuit against United Airlines.
My response to an important new article by Scott Keller
Reason's writers and editors share their suggestions for what you should be buying your friends and family this year.
Plus: Sexual misconduct at the FBI, Tulsi Gabbard and Mike Lee don't understand the First Amendment, and more...
Will a rightward shift on the bench would result in the reversal of Obergefell? Probably not.
An American Enterprise Institute "Are You Kidding Me?" podcast episode, with Naomi Schaefer Riley, Ian Rowe, and me.
What? Is there something supposedly wrong with liking to talk a lot?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks