Prince Harry's First Amendment Aversion Is Funny; the Governments That Agree Are Scary
We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way.
We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way.
The movie depicts the fictionalized gathering of Cassius Clay, Malcolm X, Jim Brown, and Sam Cooke, who spar over what each is doing to advance civil rights.
The surprising move raises concerns about academic freedom.
Plus: Three things that aren't as bad as they seem, Tennessee bans certain treatments for transgender minors, and more...
It's a working model for non-state governance in cyberspace that is vastly preferable to government control of social media.
Targeting “extremists” threatens civil liberties while increasing the stresses that lead to violence.
Plus: On SATs and bias, what changed when Texas lifted its mask mandate, and more...
Released May 10, but just posted on Westlaw.
The policies don't accomplish much more than putting money in some gun owners' pockets.
The defendant had been barred from presenting his defense, as a sanction for his persistent violation of court orders, including one that he had expressly consented to.
Plus: Cult panic, what the AT&T merger means, and more...
Only students support extending the power to penalize speech, raising concerns about what they’re learning in school.
If plaintiff broadly claims that defendant libeled her by "imputing unchastity," she risks having to disclose a lot about her sexual history.
But the "racial ridicule" statute under which this is happening (1) by its terms doesn't cover such speech, and (2) if it did, it would be unconstitutional.
And claims of veiled threats don't change that.
Regulations might reshape DIY gun products, but they can’t eliminate the demand that created the industry.
Rutgers Law School, the National Coalition on Censorship, and the Washington Post.
some heterodox views about Supreme Court opinions, and more
It's an unconstitutional prior restraint, the court holds.
"All the times," "sometimes," or "rarely"? A prominent public university's training module requires faculty to give a particular answer.
Cops laugh about “probable cause on four legs” but the damage to innocent lives is real.
A member of the board (and a Cato Institute vice president) defends the controversial decision to kick the former president off the social media platform.
Don’t call yourself a supporter of the First Amendment while attempting to punish a media outlet for criticizing you.
Police were finally able to catch the serial killer using DNA genealogy databases—violating many innocent people's constitutional right to privacy.
Producers of plant-based meats argue these restrictions violate the First Amendment.
A student was expelled by St. John Fisher College for alleged sexual misconduct, but was then acquitted at a criminal trial and sued the college; the college agreed to confidentiality to settle the case, but then allegedly breached the agreement.
Victims of the FBI's constitutionally dubious raid say they've been told to come forward and identify themselves if they want their stuff back.
A CNN story on the Rutgers law school controversy; the settlement agreement in the firing of Central Michigan University professor Tim Boudreau; and the views of Prof. Nadine Strossen, former President of the ACLU.
“the public has a substantial interest in knowing about those disabilities so it can meaningfully oversee the Court’s exercise of its judicial power.”
The elected prosecutor (Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby) is claiming that the station's coverage of her is "blatantly slanted, dishonest, misleading, racist, and extremely dangerous."
Above the Law refused to publish our reply, so we're publishing it here.
Friday A/V Club: A former Black Panther's winding path
"Given that the child is of mixed race, it would seem apparent that the presence of the flag is not in the child's best interests, as the mother must encourage and teach the child to embrace her mixed race identity, rather than thrust her into a world that only makes sense through the tortured lens of cognitive dissonance."
The new law requires a criminal conviction prior to civil forfeiture and beefs up due process protections for property owners.
When officers searched Jermaine Sanders' car, they found less than half an ounce of marijuana and seized $17,000 of his money.
California insists those under 21 were legally "infants" in Founding Era; plaintiffs insist they were always part of "militia"
New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.