"Armory correctly notes the InRange Video and Recoil Article are accessible "to millions of people," as is anything posted publicly on the internet. Nonetheless, Armory fails to show the InRange Video or Recoil Article reached members of the potential jury pool, let alone irreparably tainted them."
The new ban, which has been blocked by a state judge, so far has fared better in federal court.
It’s a bold and probably unconstitutional goal that’s bound to alienate millions of Americans.
The case is not rendered moot or unripe, the court says, by the California AG's "commitment not to seek attorney's fees or costs under this provision 'unless and until a court ultimately holds that the fee-shifting provision in [a similar Texas law provision related to abortion] is constitutional and enforceable....'"
If an order had been issued, it would have expired months before the attack unless police successfully sought an extension.
The state's ban applies unless the property owner posts a sign allowing firearms or otherwise gives "express consent."
Until next year's, because capitalism is always making things better.
Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns
A court rejects a claim of religious exemption from the ban on gun possession by felons and unlawful drug users.
People with money on the line try harder than pundits to be right, and they adjust quickly when they've made a mistake.
Gun control is 'the most racist practice in America,' says the Philadelphia native and community leader.
The libertarian activist on gun rights, the new BLM ("Black Libertarian Movement"), and his support for the Mises Caucus.
After this, only five states (California, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New York) won't have such a provision in their state constitutions.
Even people who use cannabis for medical purposes risk severe penalties for daring to exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Plus: California's latest faux-trafficking sting, judge suspends New York gun restrictions, and more...
Gun Owners of America prevail in Antonyuk v. Hochul
The agency should be abolished and its employees sent to seek jobs in the private sector.
The state made it a felony to carry handguns for self-defense in "any place of worship or religious observation."
Fearmongering about mass school shootings leads to some dumb, privacy-threatening ideas.
Carry permit applicants would have to prove they are not dangerous, and guns would be banned from myriad locations.
Legislators in both states favor subjective standards and sweeping restrictions for carry permits.
So holds the Tennessee Court of Appeals.
The president supports the law that could send his son to prison for lying about his personal habits while buying a firearm.
The war on drugs conspires with the war on guns to make a mockery of justice.
The decision is a warning to states that impose vague permit standards or sweeping bans on guns in "sensitive locations."
A deeply flawed documentary by the gray lady unwittingly makes the case for why the CDC shouldn't be studying gun violence.
Amidst official hysteria over “misinformation,” the president continues to willfully misrepresent the facts on firearms.
An indictment for a crime, the court stresses, is very different from a conviction of the crime.
Yes, according to a growing body of research, says criminologist Adam Lankford.
Politicians bypass hard legislative work and constitutional protections to target activities they don’t like.
"consisting of approximately 171 million handguns, 146 million rifles, and 98 million shotguns." There are also estimates of AR-15 ownership and ownership of magazines that hold over 10 rounds (which some state laws classify as "large-capacity").
You don't have to prove to a government official that you have “proper cause” to exercise your constitutional right, the Court ruled.
But wouldn't the arguments in the dissent equally cast doubt on all historical analysis in constitutional cases, or even statutory or common-law cases?
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks