The Disturbing End of San Francisco's Last Gun Shop
High Bridge Arms, founded in the mid-1950s by Olympic shooter Bob Chow, shuts down rather than give local police its customer list.
High Bridge Arms, founded in the mid-1950s by Olympic shooter Bob Chow, shuts down rather than give local police its customer list.
Inside the emotion-fueled politics of Planned Parenthood and school shootings
High Bridge Arms gun shop refused to handover customer information to police.
High Bridge Arms, founded in the mid-1950s by Olympic shooter Bob Chow, shuts down rather than give local police its customer list.
Triggers coming gun fight.
There's little chance of Australia's model coming to the states.
The major political parties both push policies that endanger our most basic liberties.
The Democratic presidential candidate thinks Australia's mass confiscation of firearms "is a good example."
Second Circuit finds "intermediate scrutiny" of laws impacting Second Amendment allows full ban of certain weapons to pass constitutional muster.
These anti-gun positions haven't traditionally done the Democratic Party much good.
A teenager used the gun to shoot two police officers.
About that National Journal gun chart…
Black Panthers, hunters, and "nuts with guns"
For the liberal, every societal problem has a state-issued remedy waiting to be administered.
Despite continuing declines in gun violence, Fred Hiatt says enough is enough.
An expanded requirement would be ineffective, unjust, and unenforceable.
Clinton wants to make gun manufacturers financially liable for misuse of their products and require background checks for all gun transfers.
Not what People wants them to think.
Guns - and the Second Amendment - won't just disappear.
Like the president, the presumptive Democratic nominee assumes we can identify mass shooters before they strike.
What happened to gun control from 2000 to 2012? Funny you should ask...
Talking about mass shootings, the president cited data on suicides.
What The New Yorker gets wrong about guns and the Constitution.
Increasingly sophisticated homemade guns are so entrenched cops fear their use by organized crime, so now let's fret over desktop weapons of mass destruction.
More background checks, more assault weapon bans, more suits against gun makers and sellers, and expanding group of people to whom gun ownership bans apply.
How would the government enforce a limit on the number of firearms people may possess?
Their profile is shared by many people who never kill anyone.
The only defender guaranteed to be present at any attack against you is you.
Last week President Obama asked us to compare terrorism to gun violence. Maybe we should.
Obama's talk of common-sense gun safety laws don't seem to apply to this tragedy.
Wants less shouting, more good policy.
Any attempt to stop would-be murderers from buying guns is bound to be overinclusive, underinclusive, or both.
How can we know simple gun safety laws would help when we know nothing about circumstances of how the killer got the gun?
The answer, like the frequency of youth gun carrying, may vary from state to state.
The most popular gun-control proposals would have little effect, while the most effective measures would be immensely unpopular.
Do less than 1 percent of crime victims defend themselves with firearms?
State AG just got the authority to investigate such shootings last month.
National Journal reads too much into a correlation.
A thriving and unbeatable black market makes weapons available no matter what officials intend.
"I've been a human powder keg for a while....just waiting to go BOOM," said Flanagan.
The New York Times thinks so.
"Stronger mental health screenings for prospective gun owners" would strip many harmless people of their Second Amendment rights.
Chuck Schumer and Amy Schumer employ the same old anti-gun rhetoric.
In New York City, you can't even wield a fake gun on TV... unless you're making anti-gun propaganda.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks