A New Book Reveals Facebook's Problems Started Way Before the 2016 Election
In Facebook: The Inside Story, even Steven Levy’s most generous conclusions about the tech giant are still pretty damning.
In Facebook: The Inside Story, even Steven Levy’s most generous conclusions about the tech giant are still pretty damning.
So the Ninth Circuit correctly (and unsurprisingly) holds in Prager University v. Google.
The conservative nonprofit Prager University alleged the company should not be allowed to place its videos on "Restricted Mode."
The New York Times technology reporter is revealing how social media is encouraging individual expression.
The justices heard oral arguments this week in United States v. Sineneng-Smith.
A couple of posts prompted by an error (since corrected) in an article that cited our brief.
"At a time when hate and bias incidents are on the rise, it is crucial that the state not remove these types of prohibitions that deter or punish this unacceptable behavior."
Nobody is being misled by this obviously joking debate clip. But this sort of ginned-up outrage will be used to target political opponents.
How the press learned to stop worrying and love censorship.
What’s at stake in United States v. Sineneng-Smith.
A clear constitutional violation.
The mob strategy is morally and practically flawed.
The lawsuit had been filed against the University of Colorado; the Scheduling Order, which the professor had sought to seal, referred to allegations of improper conduct on the professor's part.
Critics say the long-running satiric cartoon has created "a generation of boys" who are smug and disengaged.
In Janus, the Court rejected requirements that government employees pay dues to unions; now the question before the Court is whether this applies to mandatory bar membership (and bar dues).
Government wants to force social media platforms to accept a “duty of care” to protect users from whatever they deem harmful.
"The district court should not be a party to concealing this information from the public, especially as it concerns an arbitration organization that holds itself out to the public as impartial. These documents would be useful to the public in evaluating the true extent to which the organization is impartial."
An update on that Connecticut unsealing case.
Plus: Sanders tops Biden in new national poll, how federal housing policy is getting families evicted, and more...
(and perhaps to other government records).
Four Second Circuit judges gave fair use victories (separately) to rapper Drake and blogger Sargon of Akkad, concluding that defendants' uses of plaintiffs' work to comment on it and criticize it were fair use and thus not copyright infringement.
Plus: Maybe Buttigieg didn't win Iowa? Vermont considers decriminalizing prostitution. Customs and Border Protection gets a status change. And more...
Episode 10 of Free Speech Rules, a video series by UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh
"Say what you will about ISIS but at least they're not Islamophobic." Journalist Andrew Doyle has created the ultimate parody account.
If a motion to recuse argues that the judge has a conflict of interest because she owns particular property, can the judge order the redaction of all the details related to the location of the property?
"We need to stop this generation of big tech companies from profiting off of lies to the American people," the candidate told PEN America.
What’s at stake in Michigan v. Wood
A clear First Amendment violation, I think -- but it's the law in Tennessee.
Online platforms would have to "earn" speech protections by compromising encryption—all in the name of fighting child porn.
GOP attacks on internet smut are heating up, but the porn industry has more practical threats to worry about.
The attempted muzzling of the former national security advisor is dubious.
When politicians call to punish “disinformation,” we should worry about what that definition encompasses.
Erroneous predictions of violence at the Richmond rally conflated civil libertarians with militant racists.
That's the logical implication of a recent Second Circuit panel decision (though one involving a non-journalist).
A federal court has allowed the case to go forward, and is considering whether to preliminarily enjoin the restrictions.
No, Californians aren't banned from showering and doing laundry on the same day. But the fact that so many people believed that lie says something about how insane the state's real water laws are.
"I don't think you should do Twitter if you think you're better than Twitter."
Plus: Clinton says "nobody likes" Bernie, Biden wants Section 230 revoked, Iran takes responsibility for Jan. 8 plane crash, and more...
A new story from Fox 11 (L.A.).
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10